Most successful Bollywood Actors: 2010 – 2015

Following up on yesterday’s ‘Most Successful Actors between 2000 and 2009‘, we have the list of actors that were most successful in the current decade. 2016 releases haven’t been included while calculating the figures because a lot of big stars like Salman Khan, Hrithik Roshan, Aamir Khan, Varun Dhawan and Ranveer Singh haven’t had a release so far this year.

The analysis does have quite a few surprises! Read on..

Most number of films between 2010 – 2015:

  • Akshay Kumar – 21 films
  • Ajay Devgn – 18 films
  • Emraan Hashmi – 14 films
  • Salman Khan – 10 films
  • Shahid Kapoor – 10 films
  • Ranbir Kapoor – 8 films
  • Ranveer Singh - 8 films
  • Shah Rukh Khan – 7 films
  • Arjun Kapoor – 6 films
  • Hrithik Roshan – 6 films
  • Varun Dhawan – 6 films
  • Sidharth Malhotra – 4 films
  • Aamir Khan – 4 films

Total Net Collections for each actor between 2010 – 2015:

  • Salman Khan - 1676 crore
  • Akshay Kumar – 1475 crore
  • Ajay Devgn – 1072 crore
  • Shah Rukh Khan – 1011 crore
  • Aamir Khan – 732 crore
  • Hrithik Roshan – 720 crore
  • Ranbir Kapoor – 642 crore
  • Ranveer Singh - 582 crore
  • Emraan Hashmi – 556 cr
  • Varun Dhawan – 507 crore
  • Shahid Kapoor – 334 crore
  • Arjun Kapoor – 329 crore
  • Sidharth Malhotra – 291 crore

Average net box office collections per film between 2010 – 2015:

  • Aamir Khan – 183.0 crore
  • Salman Khan – 167.6 crore
  • Shah Rukh Khan – 144.4 crore
  • Hrithik Roshan – 120.0 crore
  • Varun Dhawan - 84.5 crore
  • Ranbir Kapoor – 80.3 crore
  • Akshay Kumar – 77.6 crore
  • Sidharth Malhotra - 73.4 crore
  • Ranveer Singh - 72.6 crore
  • Ajay Devgn – 59.6 crore
  • Arjun Kapoor - 54.8 crore
  • Emraan Hashmi – 39.7 crore
  • Shahid Kapoor – 33.4 crore

Success Ratio i.e Above Average or better  (probably the most important, because it’s the percentage of films that recovered investment)

  • Shah Rukh Khan - 100%
  • Varun Dhawan – 100%
  • Salman Khan – 90%
  • Aamir Khan – 75%
  • Hrithik Roshan – 67%
  • Ranbir Kapoor – 50%
  • Arjun Kapoor – 50%
  • Sidharth Malhotra – 50%
  • Ranveer Singh - 50%
  • Akshay Kumar – 48%
  • Ajay Devgn – 44%
  • Emraan Hashmi – 43%
  • Shahid Kapoor – 20%

Hit Ratio i.e Hit or better

  • Shah Rukh Khan – 86%
  • Varun Dhawan – 83%
  • Salman Khan – 80%
  • Hrithik Roshan – 67%
  • Aamir Khan – 50%
  • Ranbir Kapoor – 50%
  • Arjun Kapoor – 50%
  • Sidharth Malhotra – 50%
  • Ranveer Singh - 50%
  • Ajay Devgn – 39%
  • Emraan Hashmi - 36%
  • Akshay Kumar – 33%
  • Shahid Kapoor – 20%

Blockbuster Ratio (this was worth pointing out, simply because the difference between actors is huge!)

  • Salman Khan – 70%
  • Aamir Khan – 50%
  • Ranbir Kapoor – 25%
  • Hrithik Roshan – 17%
  • Shah Rukh Khan – 14%
  • Emraan Hashmi – 14%
  • Ajay Devgn – 11%
  • Akshay Kumar – 5%

In conclusion, it’s quite clear that the decade so far has belonged to Salman Khan. Veer had to be included in the list because it released after 2010 and that hurt his success ratio. Apart from that, Jai Ho missed out on a ‘hit’ verdict. Those two films aside, he hasn’t put a foot wrong. Salman has a 70% blockbuster ratio i.e 7 out of his 10 films were blockbusters or better. This record, in itself, is better than every other stat that we’ve mentioned and we had to include it simply because no other actor has probably achieved it before. It’s hard to describe how huge it is, because his blockbuster count is almost the same as all other actors combined! His 10 films have also collected about 200 crore more than Akshay Kumar’s 21 films!

Shah Rukh Khan is the biggest surprise here. Between 2010 and 2015, he hasn’t had a film that has been completely rejected. No film has failed to cross the 200 crore worldwide mark either (of course, Fan hasn’t, but that film was this year). He and Varun Dhawan are the only actors with a 100% success ratio. Shah Rukh’s hit ratio is the highest too, not too bad for a man who’s supposedly going through a career low?! It’ll be interesting to see how the next 5 years pan out for him.

Aamir Khan missed out with Dhobi Ghat and Talaash, but hit the ball out of the park with Dhoom 3 and PK. He does very few films, but those few have worked big. Ajay Devgn’s box office performance was much improved as compared to the previous decade, quite a few of his films have done well.

Hrithik has been consistent, good success ratio, great average per film.. Kites and Guzaarish were his big failures. He needs to up the ante a bit and do more films.

Akshay Kumar tops the ‘number of films’ list once again, he’s easily been the most prolific. His average, which was in the mid-70s until the end of 2015, has also improved with his two releases in 2016. His choice of films is making a difference at the ticket window.

The younger stars like Varun, Arjun, Sidharth, Ranbir and Ranveer have had great starts to their career. Their success ratio is very high compared to the first few years of actors who made their debuts in the 90s. It shows that they take each of their films very seriously. Special mention for Varun, he’s been terrific. The very fact that a film like ‘Dilwale’ has been his biggest box office disappointment, says a lot about his career so far. ‘Dishoom’ will be a test.

Emraan hasn’t had a bad decade, he was doing well in the beginning, but has faltered in the last 3-4 years. Shahid has been very poor, way too many failures against his name.

Advertisements

191 Comments

  • again i say do a whole carrier analysis article for srk,salman,aamir,hritihk,akshay,ajay. fan wars will be interesting &it will give you a good traffic.

  • Everyone saying that SRK is going through bad phase or career low but its totally wrong.

    How can anyone in his bad phase can be so consistent??
    How can anyone in his bad phase can give highest openers of all time 2 times??
    How can anyone in his bad phase can give highest grosser of all time??
    How can anyone in his bad phase can give a good openings with clash or with a movie like Fan??
    How can anyone in his bad phase can have 100% success ratio (excluding Fan)??

    He is behind only Aamir and Salman ( HRO can overtake him with MD) in Indicine’s ranking.
    In my view (though for majority I’ll be wrong) he isn’t in a bad phase or career low. Bad choices of script and Aamir and Salman’s dominance on box office like no one in history of Bollywood made people believe that is in a bad phase of his career.
    (From a Salman fan)

  • @kiddo..
    So Ranveer and Varun are bigger than Joker??

    Taraas athi hai tuj pe… Seriously pity your fragile brain. Shut up and go to sleep

  • Add
    Dulha mil gya
    Shahrukh bola khubshurat hai tu
    Always kabhi kabhi
    Love breakup zindagi…
    In srk list…
    Or remove dhobi ghat…

  • Hoping the list to update after 2016 because after that Varun probably topping the chart of 100% success ratio. Hahaha
    I don’t understand the inclusion of Dhobhi Ghat in the list and even its verdict as when it released Indicine given it semi-hit verdict and now its not count as a success.
    Logically his success ratio is 100% and hit ratio is 67% and could become 75% with Dangal.
    No issue Aamir has 2 films on festive season in those 6 years and both were ATBB and ATHG. In whole decade others are chasing his movies collection. Let’s see how Dangal Fares.

    If Dangal collects 280+ than Aamir totals with 4 lead performance outdone Srk 8 film collection in India. Would be incredible.

    Overall Salman has dominated this decade as per BO perspective and Akshay on content and quantity perspective.

    @Sunny why to shout for inclusion of Airlift & HF3 because with Sultan he again comes at top with no figures.

  • Salman khan’s 10 films made 200 crores more than Akshay’s 21 films. Ha ha ha. @indicine, take a bow

  • To take down Aamir Khan, indicine had to include ‘Dhobi Ghat’ into consideration! lol in this list.
    Aamir is the biggest superstar at current time, critically and commercially. Not any non-actor or overactor.

  • haha….indicine…full mad…..aamir success ratio 50%….he is the highest grosser…..i think indicine in favour of srk…….varun hit ratio more than aamir………y u add dhobighat in aamir..nd y not billu barbar in srk…….u also knw that aamir is the biggest star……..bajrangi bhaijaan is good bt still not break the record of pk….everyone knws sallu fan following…..bt still fail to break aamir record………people are not mad….so stop making fool people……everyone knw where aamir stands……when his average is 180 crore…..more than anyone else…then how his success nd hit ratio is so less……maths ki class lo…….indians are not full……if sallu in fan movie…then movie definately crosses 150 atleast……according to me aamir nd salman nly these two megastar……..aamir is legend…

  • If this decade is low of SRK then which is good or better decade?! lol…. hahahah… if we compare the decades then this decade is the best of SRK so how can anyone say that this is bad phase of SRK ? ROFL…. fools…. and remember that, this decade is different from all bcz akshay’s flop film of 80 crs is better than Highest grosser of SRK of previous decade…. so overall, this ain’t a bad phase for SRK… these all are being said to show SRK superior but this won’t work… bcz reality is reality and Fake is Fake.

  • Source Wikipedia:

    Srk
    83 114 112 102 208 183 140 = 942/7 = 134.57

    Aamir
    14 93 261 336 = 704/4 = 176

    Salman
    38 141 131 161 199 178 116 233 320 207 = 1724/10 = 172.4

  • if aamir khan is considered for dhobi ghat.., then srk should be considered for dulha mil gya 2010, his screen time is about 50minutes. and he is used in songs and movie posters. dulha mil gya was a flop movie.

  • Akki’s success ratio will definitely increase this and upcoming years his good movies are coming up rustom, robot 2, baby 2, namaste england, bazaar and toilet ek prem khatha

  • @Hrithikian from Nepal
    You are from Nepal that’s why you don’t know that Ready was Blockbuster & Highest Non-Holiday grosser of it’s time.
    And what others Khan’s gave on Non-Holidays Flop & SemiHit.
    And Hrithik that Jadoo boy always manipulates figures heavily still is way behind Khan’s.
    Leave Fan Wars,
    Khan’s are the Living Legends of Indian Cinema.

  • If @indicine proves RaOne and Jab tak was bigger than JAI HO then I will be SRK fan for life…..how come those movies are HIT???

  • Lol, non-actor fans were chanting about 2010-2015 but even in this period (Which was “So-called” bad phase of SRK) :

    SRK : 100% success ratio
    non-actor : 70% success ratio

    Yes, non-actor is way ahead from others in terms of BBs and no body is snatching that credit from him.
    But these auto-walas had created such a havoc as though SRK was completely out from the race during 2010-2015, though statistics have different story to tell :D

    P.S. : Will be “Less active/inactive” for next 3-4 days. BREXIT has hit us hard and we are having sleepless nights planning the segregation of UK based Applications from other EU nations.
    Hopefully, from Monday onwards, I will regain the pace.

    @Indicine : Thanks a ton for the article. It is an eye-opener for one and all.

  • If You take trade figures then there is a huge between amir,salman and hrithik and srk.due to manipulation they are nearers to amir and salman but actually others are way behind if u take real figures.even in srk case manipulation has changed his movie verdicts.

  • @Akki king

    You brought out 2 stats…

    Total net akki… 1475
    Total net. Ajay… 1072.

    Difference of…. 403 crs.. With 3 more movies….Considering most of akki movies been of higher budget… But

    Success ratio is 48 vs 44… So what about the younger actors ahead of both of them in terms of success ratio? Are they bigger than akki?

    Hit ratio… 39 vs 33… Am not seeing any huge difference even with Ajay more hits.

    Just like akki movies some…Ajay did terrible movies like Tezz Aakrosh Tpks Himmatwalla.. Which really affected his average… Plus “Mr Fraud ” which they included a shelved movie!!

    The total net collection you are shouting @ remember still incurred lots of loss based on budget and his signing fees. What’s surprising me is your 2nd comment on 1st page.. Referring to Akki having more 403 crs than Ajay with 3 movies more seems as if it’s an achievement for Akki being ahead of Ajay. As am Ajay fan I too would have said wow! more than Aamir Srk, Ajay total is ahead but that’s not an achievement!!

    Now if you are talking about success… You have even Arjun kapoor ahead of Akki.. Meaning what?? Arjun is bigger? I don’t know what you were trying to prove? if you proved akki total net higher than Ajay I too can say proudly Ajay total net higher than the other Khan’s… Means Ajay is bigger than they? If you say success /average net then it means you should consider Ranveer Varun Rabir Arjun bigger than Akshay.. Based on those logics of yours.. So if you agree with that then fine me too if not use your brains There’s no much difference compared with the top 4 average way more than 40 crs higher than Akki using no.4 Hrithik. That’s what you call a gap!!

  • Am done with my 1st point.. Like previously I stated once I comment on this type of topic I don’t come back to read replies or comment again cos I know many still esp his fans will bring some selective stats.. That will favour akki but then be a disadvantage because those average or success stats will be low compared with younger actors..

    If I thought like you it means I am ok with AD net bcos it’s higher than Hrithik Aamir SRK.. Or hit ratio cos higher than akki and blockbuster ratio too..for now though I know he could have avoided some poorly promoted movies.

    I read an Aamir fan commenting why they added Art movies of Aamir? they did the same for Ajay 2000-2009 knowing 70% were parallel cinema {art movies to be precise }..but no am not using that too.

    Now I will wait for Shivaay and then Badshaoo to find a clearer pic.. So for now am not in any argumentative forum or mood.

    My farewell message till we meet again on 90s article..

    ” I am not an Akki hater..2 of your fans made me to frequently bash akki. I grew up watching movies of the top 5 90s generation superstars.. Am proud to see their total net is way higher than Hrithik (mid era to youngistan total collection)..

    Bashing of AD makes no difference.. It can’t change his strata in d industry no matter how hard you try. He is daring and an accomplished parallel cinema superstar. When his contemporaries were avoiding art movies / peculiar genres He decided to rope in. As for Akshay… Only a fool will not acknowledge his versatility and like Ajay his struggle to still stay in d league of the big boys for 25 years with failure and success. Both are surely men that don’t care about the number position as you can see d nos of movies they have done. Both from Action hunks turned to comedy and exhaled.. Ajay since Qayamat shunned action movies not until Singham same with Akki with Rowdy Rathode. Akshay is more the commercial and glamorous superstar unlike Ajay being more of an parallel cinema superstar. Yes Akshay has an edge over him solely due to his success in commercial movies way back early 2000s.. You can’t take that away from him.. He is arguably the most hardworking actor we have today and off screen a gentleman. 2000 -2009 Definitely he was always among the top 3 probably I would rate him just after SRK during 2000-2009 with Aamir 3rd but understanding Ajays philosophy towards Hindi cinema will always be taken for granted for any bias blind movie fan. That said.. Still I repeat Calling Akki a way bigger superstar will always be a joke… Yeah in terms of box office he edges Ajay but when you look at their overall career stats.. You just have to agree after the Khans… Ajay and Akshay names will always be mentioned no matter how hard it is for you guys to digest.

    See you end of 2016

  • @TIGER- the real king, June 29, 2016 at 11:07 pm

    Good stats…now count the flops and disasters of Bhai and Hrithik from 2000 onwards….eh..what…umm..oh wait! Lol!

  • @indicine,now WE wanted MOST SUCCESSFUL FROM 1990-2000 OR 1990-2015.

    HOGTY

    KING SRK—-5 IN 24 YEARS>>>>>>>>>>>>salman 6 (hssh is mtistarrer,no entry is not a salman film) in 27 years.

    FROM 1990-2016

    MOST BLOCKBUSTERS—-salman (11) in 27 years,3 among south remake mostly masala genre>KING SRK (10) IN JUST 24 YEARS mostly classics

    MOST HITS/SEMI HITS—KING SRK (33)>>>>>>>>>salman (23)>>>>>>>>>>akshay kumar (19)>>>>>ajay (14)

    MOST FLOPS RATIO—akshay kumar>>>>salman khan>>>>>ajay devgan>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>amir khan(16 out of 39)>>>>>>>KING SRK(19 out of 56).

    Most disasters—-ajay devgan>>>>>>>>>>akshay kumar>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>salman khan>>>>>>>>>amir khan

    Basically the comparison is in between KING SRK and salman.

    KING SRK—-10 BBS(MOST CLASSIC)+0 DISASTERS IN 24 YEARS>>>>>>>>>>>>>salman—-11 BBS(most classless masala/remakes)+7/3 disasters in 27 years of career.

    So again KING SRK>>>>>>>>salman (according to his own FAN’S logic)

    AND IF WE COUNT SUCCESS RATIO

    salman nowhere near THE KING OF BOLLYWOOD.HENCE PROVED.

    salman—-decade struggler of 2000-2009

    Amir—-decade struggler of 1991-2000

    Ajay,akshay—-all time all decade
    struggler

    KING SRK—-ALL TIME ALL DECADE RULER

    HENCE IT’S PROVED

    MEGASTAR,MEGALEGEND KING SRK RULES BOLLYWOOD SINCE 1992-FOREVER.

    @tiger,a star whose flops (46)>>>>>>>>>>>>>is more than double of his hits (23) can be call even a big star.ha ha ha ha south remake power.still I can say bhai will take 10 more birth to attain KING OF BOLLYWOOD’S SUCCESS,ROFL.

  • If u can include the shaukeens s akkiss movie then def billu got 2 b included n u dint include omg or what?seriously indicine…rubbish article pls make the corrections

  • @Indicine please post it .. Ajay acted in 16movies in a main lead (2010-15) do you add Mr Fraud and TKSH ???

    ATKJ (29cr) Average
    Rajneeti (93cr) Blockbuster
    OUATIM (59cr) Hit
    Aakrosh (13cr) Disaster
    G-3 (108cr) Blockbuster
    DTBHJ (32cr) Flop
    Singham (101cr) Superhit
    Rascals (35cr) Flop
    Tezz (16cr) Disaster
    Bol Bachchan (101cr) Hit
    Son Of Sardaar (103) Hit
    Himmatwala (46cr) Flop
    Satyagraha (58cr) Flop
    SR (140cr) Superhit
    AJ( 57cr) Flop
    Drishyam (72cr) Semi Hit

    Total Movies – 16
    Collections -1063cr
    Avg. Per Movie – 66.43cr

    Dont know how to calculate Hit or others percentage.but 8out of 16 hit or better (50% hit ratio)
    But indicine proved it again they are against Mr Ajay.a website shouldn’t be biased towards a particular actor..

    @indicine please tell me about Mr Fraud ? This is just a name there is no movie and TKSH is an animation movie..are you going to add an animated movie ?

    Data Source – Indicine

  • so Roy is not ranbir’s film but u counted the delayed project mileng milenge and pathshala where Shahid had even a less role compare to ranbir in Roy as his film, height of biasedness

Leave a Comment