History: Filmfare Best Actor Awards

Filmfare Awards introduced in the year 1954 is the oldest and the most coveted trophy of the Hindi Film Industry also known as Bollywood. Out of more than 20 categories and trophies presented each year, the Filmfare Best Actor Award is something that the whole industry and fans look forward to. Its also the most fiercely competed and discussed category, as those nominated for the Best Actor award are usually a combination of immense popularity and talent.

The Filmfare Best Actor records

  • Dilip Kumar has been nominated 19 times and won 8 awards. The legend is also the only actor to win 3 back to back awards.
  • Shahrukh Khan has been nominated 30 times (all categories) and has won the Best Actor award 8 times, a record which he shares with Dilip Kumar.
  • Amitabh Bachchan has been nominated for a record 29 times but has won just 5 awards.
  • Hrithik Roshan has been nominated 9 times and has won 4 trophies. Hrithik is the first and only actor to win both the Best Actor and Best Debut awards in the same year (for Kaho Na Pyaar Hai). And the first actor to win both the Best Actor critics and popular award (for Koi Mil Gaya).
  • Rajesh Khanna has received 14 nominations and has won just 3.

The Top 5 received Best Actor awards for

  • Dilip Kumar – Daag, Azaad, Devdas, Naya Daur, Kohinoor, Leader, Ram Aur Shyam and Shakti
  • Shahrukh Khan – Baazigar, Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayenge, Dil To Pagal Hai, Kuch Kuch Hota Hai, Devdas, Swades, Chak De India, My Name Is Khan.
  • Amitabh Bachchan – Amar Akbar Anthony, Don, Hum, Black and Paa.
  • Hrithik Roshan – Kaho Naa Pyaar Hai, Koi Mil Gaya, Dhoom 2 and Jodha Akbar.
  • Rajesh Khanna – Saccha Jhoota, Anand and Aavishkaar

Other Filmfare Best Actor Award Facts

  • Aamir Khan has received 16 nominations but won just 2.. Aamir doesnt attend Indian award functions (except the National Award) as he feels they lack credibility and consistency.
  • Salman Khan and Akshay Kumar have never won a Filmfare Best Actor Award.

Full list of Filmfare Best Actor winners 1954 – 2009

  • 1954 – Dilip Kumar (Daag)
  • 1955 – Bharat Bhooshan (Shri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu)
  • 1956 – Dilip Kumar (Azaad)
  • 1957 – Dilip Kumar (Devdas)
  • 1958 – Dilip Kumar (Naya Daur)
  • 1959 – Dev Anand (Kala Pani)
  • 1960 – Raj Kapoor (Anari)
  • 1961 – Dilip Kumar (Kohinoor)
  • 1962 – Raj Kapoor (Jis Desh Men Ganga Behti Hai)
  • 1963 – Ashok Kumar (Rakhi)
  • 1964 – Sunil Dutt (Mujhe Jeene Do)
  • 1965 – Dilip Kumar (Leader)
  • 1966 – Sunil Dutt (Khandaan)
  • 1967 – Dev Anand (Guide)
  • 1968 – Dilip Kumar (Ram Aur Shyam)
  • 1969 – Shammi Kapoor (Brahmachari)
  • 1970 – Ashok Kumar (Ashirwad)
  • 1971 – Rajesh Khanna (Sacha Jhutha)
  • 1972 – Rajesh Khanna (Anand)
  • 1973 – Manoj Kumar (Be-Imaan)
  • 1974 – Rishi Kapoor (Bobby)
  • 1975 – Rajesh Khanna (Aavishkar)
  • 1976 – Sanjeev Kumar (Aandhi)
  • 1977 – Sanjeev Kumar (Arjun Pandit)
  • 1978 – Amitabh Bachchan (Amar Akbar Anthony)
  • 1979 – Amitabh Bachchan (Don)
  • 1980 – Amol Palekar (Golmaal)
  • 1981 – Naseeruddin Shah (Aakrosh)
  • 1982 – Naseeruddin Shah (Chakra)
  • 1983 – Dilip Kumar (Shakti)
  • 1984 – Naseeruddin Shah (Masoom)
  • 1985 – Anupam Kher (Saaransh)
  • 1986 – Kamal Haasan (Saagar)
  • 1987 – Due to security reasons, the awards ceremony was not held.
  • 1988 – Due to security reasons, the awards ceremony was not held.
  • 1989 – Anil Kapoor (Tezaab)
  • 1990 – Jackie Shroff (Parinda)
  • 1991 – Sunny Deol (Ghayal)
  • 1992 – Amitabh Bachchan (Hum)
  • 1993 – Anil Kapoor (Beta)
  • 1994 – Shah Rukh Khan (Baazigar)
  • 1995 – Nana Patekar (Krantiveer)
  • 1996 – Shah Rukh Khan (Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge)
  • 1997 – Aamir Khan (Raja Hindustani)
  • 1998 – Shah Rukh Khan (Dil To Pagal Hai)
  • 1999 – Shah Rukh Khan (Kuch Kuch Hota Hai)
  • 2000 – Sunjay Dutt (Vaastav)
  • 2001 – Hrithik Roshan (Kaho Naa Pyar Hai)
  • 2002 – Aamir Khan (Lagaan)
  • 2003 – Shahrukh Khan (Devdas)
  • 2004 – Hrithik Roshan (Koi Mil Gaya)
  • 2005 – Shahrukh Khan (Swades)
  • 2006 – Amitabh Bachchan (Black)
  • 2007 – Hrithik Roshan (Dhoom 2)
  • 2008 – Shahrukh Khan (Chak De India)
  • 2009 – Hrithik Roshan (Jodha Akbar)
  • 2010 – Amitabh Bachchan (Paa)
  • 2011 – Shahrukh Khan (My Name Is Khan)
  • 2012 – Ranbir Kapoor (Rockstar)

Something for you to comment on

  • Any actor that you feel didnt deserve the Best Actor award for his performance in a film? (See the full list above)
  • Do you think Filmfare has been unfair to the likes of Salman Khan, Aamir Khan, Akshay Kumar or any particluar actor?
  • Since 2000, the Best Actor awards have surrounded around Shahrukh Khan (3) and Hrithik Roshan (4), are they truly the best actors today?
  • Do you think Filmfare is ignoring great performances in smaller and less popular films? Like Naseeruddin Shah for A Wednesday, Rajeev Khandelwal for Aamir in 2009?
  • Should Filmfare ditch the current system of 50% Jury and 50% audience votes; and give more importance to critical acclaim than popularity / mass appeal of a film / performance / actor?
Advertisements

205 Comments

  • ############4th part#####
    Hrithik(best dancer) is a package actor he has the best looks and body and he’s the exellent dancer and also very good in acting n talented totally a complete actor and he’s the best in future; SRk(the most popular) is the most charismatic onscreen and Aamir(the best actor) is the most versatile, the most talented and the best in terms of acting BUT among the three AAMIR is the best he’s one of those actors whose aura and talent cannot be matched by anyone for quite some time he is the tom hanks or al patchino of Bollywood and that’s because he has proved himself during the last 2 decades as one of the greatest actors that India has ever produced along with Dilip kumar, Big B, Naseer Din S, Sanjeev kumar , rajesh khanna and ajay devgan again why Aamir is the best today; it’s simple he does his work more sincerely, officently, hole hearted and with PERFECTION his films have some real value of life n rarely flopped at the BO.. honestly who would think of a film like Lagaan or TZP??? It’s the best of the decade(lagaan) it was nominated in the oscars for the best foreign film category and aamir gave the best performance of this decade and of his career also in it, his great talent impressed everyone and had an international reach and appeal and it was applauded all over the world even by Hollywood stars can’t get better than this one I think so sad that the film didn’t win the OSCAR !!DCH redefined modern movies and strated trend of youth based films it was one of the best movies ever made in recent times it ws highly acclaimed by critics, RDB second best movie of this decade such a wonderful film with a good message given to the society n a rokcin music by the talented A.R Rahman, it was nominated in the Oscars also, spurred a mouvment across the country and had a noticeable impact on idian society it actually changed the life of many people, his performance was OUTSTANDING one of his best and definitely the best of that year I salute him for working in such film , TZP was a super hit though it was made by a less than 10 crore budget but grossed more than 100 crore and changed the history of Indian cinema it has become a phenomenon and has changed people’s opinion of Bollywood cinema altogether. There are people, such as my husband, who would refuse to watch a Bollywood film (because they are all the same-in his opinion) and now are discussing how far they have come with their friends. In fact TZP was applauded world over and made people all around the world it change their mind about Indian films which they think are always romantic films with no quality no value of life no message,

  • ############5th part#####
    …it made them think about Bollywood differently, and is being used everywhere to enlighten people about dyslexia and child care issues, Aamir performed brilliantly as a teacher of a dyslexic child so he’s excellent even in a supporting role (versatile). Fanaa was among the biggest hits of 2006 and grossed more than 90 crore without the Gujarat territory. Mangal Pandey which is called flop, was the biggest opener of 2005 and its first week collections were earth shattering aamir’s performance as Mangal Pandey was flawless, nodoubt some may like the film n others may not but in my opinion it wasn’t that bad though something was missing but it’s aamir’s performance which rocked the film undoubtedly. Ghajini was the highest grossing film in the history of Indian cinema ever up to that point and was the first film to cross the 200 crore mark. Ghajini also redefined marketing of movies in India n rocked 2009!!GHAJINI was the main topic in the new year!!. Just followed by 3 Idiots which has become the highest grossing Indian film of all time till date in India and overseas and has broken Ghajini’s record it was the first Indian film to cross the 300 crore mark and definitely one of the best films it was entertaining n inspiring in the same time n with its mindblowing performances especially Aamir’s n boman’s and its social message and high quality seriously bollywood needs moooore entertaining films like that one we should stop making these silly copied shits(dostana,de dana dan, salaam namastey,race,tara rum pum, heyy baby n many more….) and look forward quality and serious films we have to look for new scripts for creativity and give the quality more importance, indian industry is n°1 but in the quantity of films produced we need films like 3 idiots to make others watch our films and like them to make our industry better besides 3 idiots saved the sinking bollywood industry because of so many flops and suck films released that year(all the best, kambakkht ishq,de dana dan..); peepli live was HIGHTLY acclaimed by all critics and was a successful, inspiring n EXELLENT film in all terms without any star power. Aamir is the most creative actor, director and producer in Bollywood at the moment, his movies have broken box office records, inspired social movements, redefined marketing, redefined movie making, each movie has made a mark internationally ;so with few number of films HE OWNS THIS DECADE! And coming to his performances he rockss in every movie in each role each charcter I don’t know but I feel that he must be rewarded for every performance he does his best in every film( I know it’s stupid but that’s what I really feel!) he can pull off all kinds of roles: Drama(TZP,Dhobi Ghat etc..), Comedy(ishq,andaz apna apna; 3 idiots…), romance(dil; qayamat se qayamat tak, raja hindustani..), action(Ghajini), patriotic (rang de basanti, sarfarosh…)his difference and excellence in each role; every year he surprises us with something totally new and with a memorable performance ; his films are the most that worth waiting Today when we hear about Aamir releasing a film we go to watch it without hesitating because we know that we will find what we have expected n that he will never disappoint us he doesn’t have to utter a word to express his eyes n expressions shows it all, he’s good looking also; n he proved that he’s a genius with TZP I cannot add more this is what is called by VERSATILITY to be competent in all terms to do different roles easily n wid excellence to carry on any role whatever it is to make people laugh, cry, think; be affected, n even change their way of life…

  • ############6th part#####
    INDIA must be Proud of him as he’s their key to the OSCARS I’m happy he won PADMA SHRI and PADMA BHUSHAN for his contributions towards Indian cinema these are the real awards for me which recognizes real talent and achievement coz he really gave a lot to BOLLYWOOD…he was invited to a wax imitation statue at Madame Tussaud even before Hrithik and SRK but I don’t know why he declined it although it would have been a first step to make him recognized internationally it’s so sad! But still we love him and respect him hats off Aamir!
    For people who say Aamir does one film a year, chooses good scripts so that they can always turn out to be hits…for your information that is called being INTELLIGENT! If he does do one film a year it is because he can give his entire best performance on that one film and leave a lasting impression until next year when he comes out with another film, and longer. He has the intelligence and ability to choose good scripts that will appeal to the audience. So please, do not say something like “he only chooses good scripts” … last time I checked, choosing good scripts mean you are sensible and knowledgeable. Now is that a bad thing? I think not.
    Morover; he does not do films to execell in his performance only but does them because he believs in his films he believes in hardwork wich leads him to achieve his goals he made any role possible, Aamir does his films to entertain audience and to rule Bollywood then how can you explain him making TZP kind of film and even make it a Superhit I don’t think he did it to impress us with his performance; how can you explain him working in a risky film like RangDe and which was a big success also, do you think Hrithik or SRK would accept such film I really doubt that; how can you explain him producing and acting in a film like Lagaan which is the only bollywood film that was nominated in the Oscars in this decade; Rang de, Taare zameen par n peepli live were all selected but weren’t nominated, DCH( refused by Hrithik) is one of the best films and definetly farhan’s best one far better than the boring shit lakshya n the remake don which was an insult to Big.B, n 3 idiots was refused by SRK…(it would be really funny if the old SRK accepted this one…:D) …. that’s why all his films are worth watching if we know there is a movie that has Aamir Khan associated with it than it will be worth spending the extra dollars to watch it in the theaters, because personally I haven’t been disappointed by any of his movies since I watched lagaan (which was the first aamir’s movie that I watched) , since this film came out I was given a whole new opinion about Aamir n since than I started watching all his movies. He knows how to choose the right script n then turn the film superhit this is what is called by POWER…
    Also remember in Kofee with Karan , Randhir Kapoor said , “According to me Aamir is a great actor and I am seeing him in future Greater then Dilip Kumar or Raj Kapoor” and anurag kashyap said” Aamir’s involvement in out-of-the-box projects like Rang de Basanti allow them to be made, since producers feel assured that his name on the banner will ensure a return on their investment. Indeed, market gossip has it that, when Rang de Basanti was strapped for funds at one stage, Aamir put in money to keep the project on track”….he accepts even small budget films and make them superhits; he also said “Aamir’s involvement in Lagaan made Shah Rukh do a Swades—to keep up with Aamir, as it were. Of course, whether or not they were influenced by Aamir’s example, other Bollywood stars, too, have made unconventional choices since he began. Hrithik Roshan not only demonstrated extraordinary acting calibre, but made a bold choice, potentially slippery for his superstar career, by taking the unconventional lead role in Koi Mil Gaya”that’s why aamir is the WAY bollywood should go if they want to compete with Hollywood.

  • ############7th part#####
    And last but not least I totally accept aamir’s attitude to Filmfare.. i mean these bullshit awards do they have any international recognition??..Althought Filmfare is the most important award show in India n better than other joke ceremonies including IIFA, Zee, stardust, star screen(the worst)…etc which are trying to satisfy everyone by making many categories(most popular actor, star plus Jodi, best entertainer…) it’s really funny it’s a mockery!!!. …) but yet it lost it’s credibility also in the last few years it’s ridiculous to see this oldieee SRK nominated for each role; and rewarded every year for the so called the POWER AWARD hell!! BUT “FilmUnfair” it’s not always that bad as they gave awards to the well deserving ones many times( ex: Aamir for lagaan ;Hrithik for koi mil gaya, ,SrK for Chakde…) But I object against all those who are criticizing aamir’s attitude: in fact he knew that they are useless since the beginning that’s why he have never been interested in them he’s a guy who never works for awards he believes only in hardwork I will not say that he hates awards becoz no one actually does but he wouldn’t develop such attitude if they were credible n rewarding the deserving persons but I would totally agree with him here coz in fact even the nominees are sometimes choking I mean for ex how can the vamp Aish be nominated for D 2 or SRK for OSO and how can’t saif get a nomination for Hum tum, ajay for Omkara or Aamir for Fanaa were they jokin!!!!!so he’s totally right here to not give them any importance he has been like that from his early carrer if he was really interested in them he would attend them n perform like others then walk away with his awards..he wouldn’t loose anything!!he was the only actor who was nominated for the best actor each year(apart from Big B) from 1988 till now he was nominated17 times n won just 2 big B was nominated 29 times and won just 5!!!do you think it’s really logical ! also object against those who say, aamir is not coming to awards, so he should not be awarded, in that case he should not be even nominated but as they are nominating him that means that he has to win when he’s deserving Ok! N also we shouldn’t say nthat Aamir sued the filmfare because he didn’t win many awards if so then why is he attending the National awards since he didn’t win any best actor award (he won a special jury award for Rakh) so Aamir does not attend the function, but the point of these awards is “who’s the best” irrespective of the person coming for it. You are judging the acting not a person n don’t forget Aamir has been a victim of favoritism to Shahrukh during 1990s….
    Actually Filmfare has become something like “Family awards” it’s more like a family affair between roshans/johar/chopra/srk/bachchans..Filmfare must stop linking YR’ and SRK’s feets and recognize every talent whether the film is a hit, or a flop; small budget or big badget films and give the award to the best performance not the best person
    Dont forget that filmfare awrd is also a business. An actor takes rs 50 million to perform on filmfare awrd. Now imagine how much money filmfare gain in return when the show is being broadcasted worldwide. Everything is business today. Actors like Hrithik, amitabh, especially Shahrukh are rewarded every year bcoz they are very popular among public. Public always dream to see these popular actors on stage . Now Imgine u r watching the entire filmfare show and finally u discover that actors like nana patekar, anil kapoor, or sunny deol are awrded best actor. Public’s entire interest just faded. If every single person refuse to watch the award show, then consequently filmfare will be in big loss since no one will buy it.. in fact evrything is business. Thats why sharukh is filmfare’s favourite choice. We never see others being awardd best actor despite their hard works

  • ############8th part#####

    I totally lost faith in these awards ever since Best actor award or let’s say the best actor for modeling was given to Hrithik for his “non-perform
    ance” in the biggest shit of all time Dhoom 2 !!Hold on man ; Did someone forget that he was the negative lead there; C’mon, the folks (the so called “jury”) at Filmfare Awards must have been high on some low quality stuff, otherwise how else can they overlook Aamir’s performance in Rang De Basanti, he gave the best performane of the year in RangDe no doubt so did Sanju in LRM, ajay in Omkara n Aamir he wasn’t the supporting actor he was the LEAD who said that he was a supporting role has to SHUT UP n get a life! If aamir was the supp role so what was Hrithik??? He was so much better in both RangDe n Fanaa than hrithik in Krrish n Dhoom 2 ! my italian friends didn’t get it when I told them that in India this actor got it for D 2 they were actually chocked how can a film which is a full copy from different Hollywood films be such a success n how can an actor get the best actor award for such role! All of them agreed that aamir’s performance was far superior especially in Rang D ..Chill people is these called awards!! Where actors are getting rewarded for their jumping or doing some stunts..if that is the case I prefer superman returns (2006)Again Hrithik was superhero in KRRISH which is like saying Tobey maguire in spiderman or Christan bale of batman but must say he was in all terms MUCH better here than in D 2 no doubt and he was the lead.. he wasn’t good at all in Dhoom 2(it’s a rip off of Fast and Furious, such bad n boring film with no story n had a wrong message integrated in it honestly seeing this film being a major success in india is the saddest day for cinema and art!) and if aamir’s performance in Ghajini wasn’t an original was hrithik’s one original c’mon they copied almost every English movie there..the stunts were done by a body double..I didn’t actyally see Tom cruise getting the best actor award for Mission Impos sible that shows how the Indian ceremonies are useless, fake n wid 0 credibility. In fact there was no room for acting in D 2; the man got the award precisely because they are slaves of the star-system in Bollywood and will do everything to keep things the way they are.!! I believe that Hrithik can do MUCH better he was so much superior in all other years KMG, KPH,JA n Fiza …but still not even close to aamir’s lagaan, rang de bsanti, dil chahta hai n 3 idiots…

  • ############9th part#####
    in D2 all he did was dance, flex his muscles and enact wierd fight scenes with that aweful Aishwarya ; if they call walking in slow motion, posing as if modeling all the time, jumping from cliffs, dancing and making faces as acting, then I quit right here, No point arguing over that , BUT If so then how did they give him the award for Jodhaa Akbar since it was a critically acclaimed performance why do the critically acclaimed movies n performances get recognition suddenly like the case of Black in 2005 and the year after aamir for RDB, or ajay for omkara were rejected in that case they should have gave it to Aamir for Ghajini instead like they gave it to Hrithik for D 2 n rejected Aamir they should have give the critics award for Hrithik that year coz after all aamir got it for RangD it’s almost the same case though Aamir was MUCH MUCH MUCHHHHHHH better in Ghajni than Hrithik in D:2 coz simply the role in gajini was a very difficult n complex one…Building a body that he has never had before in his life it’s A role that would have certainly emotionally drained him as well (it isn’t easy to be living the life of a character who looses his memory every 15 minutes only to remember every passing moment that his mission in life is to take revenge) the 180 degree shift in the expressions in a single scene that is done by him , the rage in his face n his eyes…People seem to be too engrossed in imposing their preconceive ideas and their choice of actors, Ghajini Is not about Aamir building his body, its about what it takes for an actor to go through to do a character according to the script of the movie. Aamir bags five out of five for bringing in that dedication. He deserves a ROYAL SALUTE He was EXELLENT in Ghajini no one could hav done or even accept such difficult n challenging role the only weakness in all the film is that it’s not an original one but it is the magic of Aamir Khan that can make a remake so exceptional ;also I heard some criticizing Ghajini..People don’t have taste. Although Ghajini is a remake of a pre-inspired movie. But it is a far better than many other films (ex: RNBDJ or singh is king which were the most wrongly hyped films ). When the film-maker has already pronounced in public that the film is a remake why do we have to make of fuss of it. Its a copy, let the viewer choose if they want to watch it and like it. A film cannot be bad only because of its adaptation from another film. It’s a remake but still it was a very good film in terms of story line and performance. GHAJINI is a genuine adaptation, n Aamir was the best thing abt it I don’t know abt the tamil actor actually but we all know that Aamir is a class actor so no more questions about it? Pratice objectivity… that will give room for improvement… coming to Hrithik he is very good but I must say :DHOOM 2 was his worst OKAY? He won it that year probably becoz of his dancing n bcoz of aamir’s attitude but it should be the best dancer not the best actor!!! SRK is just ignored that year(2006)..he sucked especially in Don! He shouldn’t be nominated for it ;it was more like a negative role so was Hrithik in D2 althought he was OK in KANK he deserved a nomination which must remain a nomination while aamir should have received a nomination for Fanaa instead of SRK’s Don n ajay deserved to be nominated for Omkara instead of Hrithik’s Dhoom 2 …so it’s clear here you cannot give it to SRK each year or else you’ll be criticized by everyone you can’t also give it to Aamir because he cares a fig of these awards so it’s simple give it to Hrithik n everyone will be satisfied ..

  • ############10th part#####
    again when Amitabh won it for Paa, well amitabh is the best actor, a legend ,excellent and very versatile actor but this is the award for the best actor (performance) not the lifetime achievement award!! so what if Amitabh won it from the National film award for Paa? he deserved it for khakee but saif won it does that mean that saif was better? Hrithik didn’t win it for KMG n Aamir didn’t for Lagaan although they both gave the most outsatanding n memorable performances of this decade n were applauded by critics and masses does that mean that they weren’t good jst bcoz they didn’t win National film award? Rani, kajol, kareena, madhuri have never won it while Priyanka won it..the wooden Arjun who’s considered as one of the worst actors hav won National film award for best support actor for Rock on is he better than others? I don’t think so! the performances shouldn’t be judjed by the National film award I think and if Amitabh won many awards for Paa how can Darsheel’s performance be overlooked? He acted as a child actor Naturally and Brilliantly no doubt and didn’t won a single ebst actor award!! But many believed that he ven deserved a National award for his unbelieveable performance so why ignoring the effort and talent of young fresh actors who gave their best like shahid(kaminey) that year; why is the industry forgetting excellence? I think that they were unfair with shahid who deserved the critics best performance instead of ranbir .But Aamir, he was commendable in 3 Idiots and so does was the only choice for jury he performed superbly…being middle aged person…he performed excellently as a young genious teenager his role was inspiring one he made us cry, laugh without saying a word… he’s beyond comparison that year it’s completely inappropriate that the award was given to Big B here it’s clear that the awards were fixed that year! Aamir did the role of Rancho with PERFECTION and it looked soooo NATURAL and that is the diference between his performance n amitabh’s and yet FilmUnfair still not appreciate him for his phenomenal acting he deserved this one definetly!! totally unfair to him and the audience. Everyone expected that justice will finally be made after 20 years of hardwork BUT….that’s life.. Aamir should leave the industry and work in Hollywood where he will truly get what he deserves looool !but that does not matter as he won the PADMA BHUSHAN that year wich Is mooooore important and real….

  • ############11th part#####
    • Well to be honest for me these are the deserving from 1996:
    1996: aamir for rangeela or akele hum akele tum no doubt far better than SRK in DDLJ but he wasn’t even nominated for rangeela I’m stunned! It was One of the most power packed performances by Aamir, he did it perfectly his expressions were outstanding in it I guess everyone agree wid me in this na!
    1997: aamir for raja Hindustani totally deserving one he was PERFECT as Raja Hindustani one of his memorable performances just luved him<3
    1998: Anil Kapoor for virsaat he was condemnable though he didn’t deserve it for Beta it was definitely Aamir for JJWS that year but in Virsaat he totally deserved it everyone was chocked when SRK won it average performance not derserving…
    1999: Aamir for Ghulam: excellent performance just watch Ghulam n you’ll understand As many said KKHH was an excellent film but because of its songs n story not because of SRK..just like DDLJ n DTPH
    2000:Sunjay for vaastav, Aamir made an outstanding performance in Sarfarosh no doubt in fact he won it from some other ceremonies but sunjay was at his best in vaastav it’s really hard to choose but must say Sunjay deserved that one…it’s his best
    2001:hrithik for KNPH; an excellent performance by a debut he deserved it SRK wasn’t bad in mohabbatein he was good but Hrithik was better I think, in fact that year there weren’t many good performance by leading roles..that’s why the competition wasn’t really though
    2002: aamir for Lagaan: I think no question about this one no need to talk here…the best of the best!!
    2003:Ajay for company: outstanding performance SRK’s performance was poor in Devdas
    2004:hrithik for KMGY: he deserved it
    2005:Big B for Khakee :I firmly belive that it’s one of his most powerful performances I think everyone agrees wid me…maybe even better than Black
    2006: amitabh for black no comment tatally deserving just like Khakee
    2007: aamir in Rangde: Best of that year totally deserved to win n one of his best I explained that above have no idea how Hrithik got this one it was a kind of chock!!! It was the worst decision of Filmfare ever N y Aamir was just nominated for 1 while HR n SRK were nominated for their both roles? He was flawless in Fanaa also
    2008:SRK for Chakde; the best of his career though darsheel gave an OUTSTANDING performance it was the most difficult choice really maybe they both deserved it I don’t know!
    2009:hrithik for Jodhaa or Aamir for Ghajini ..Aamir was EXELLENT and even above in Ghajini n the competition was thought between the two but they should have better gave it to both because their roles were totally different but both excelled in them they simply rocked, Rest all are just cancellations(exept naseer who gave a perfect performance)
    2010: aamir for 3 idiots: natural and phenomenal performance best of that year, no question about this one he was just amazing everyone fell in love wid Rancho I think it was a kind of cheating by giving it to amitabh …this one seemed to be fixed no doubt since there’s no SRK no Hrithik so it’s simple: give it to Amitabh but most importently not AAMIR!!hell but if Big B is paying for awards why didn’t he buy it for Khakhee,Deewer or zanjeer but for PAA!!!it’s ridiculous!!really
    2011:ajay devgan for OOATIM he was excellent far better than SRK in My name is khan who got it all wrong he has been below par and his performance was immaturish. He presented the sensitive character of a disabled person like a caricature it’s shameful that he won it he’s always the one who steals the award from Ajay…but hey that’s life

  • ############ 12th part#####
    I think SRK deserved just 1: shakde India he didn’t deserve the other 7 awards he got especially the one for DEVDAS he must give it back… n if h continues to play the roles he has gotten into then he is going to go down in the history like the downhill that came for Rajesh Khanna (I love Rajesh Khanna more than any of his contemporary actors) he will finish off very soon. So SRK wake up, look what’s going around and grow up (learn). Being No1 or King takes the Bollywood to nowhere. Create history, inspire people, stop claiming King (symboly of dictatorship) and concentrate in your acting try to improve your acting abilities. If you can fulfill them then you can make your fans delighted rather than blinding them in their talk and regreting when they go to bed I always wonder why shar rukh khan cannot do realistic movies like swades. Why does he always come out with such silly films it’s clear he’s interseted more in always being in top an remaining the best by making many films than satisfying critics, but I am sure he can never satisfy critics becuase he lacks the quality of acting that aamir or amitabh have. SRK needs always big directors n banners to work with: YRF; karan;farhan…to make his film a superhit unlike Aamir who works with any direstor any banner even in his early carreer n can even turn his film the biggest hit of all time with any director.. as for SRK it has become hard for him, Karan johar makes only one type of movies which is not really apreciatd nwadys. Yash chopra’s days r gone. His latest production r flops…Farhan is not a good director. Only dil chahata hai was superd thats also bcoz of super talented actor amir khan ;as I said before lakshya was boring piece of crap n Don was so fake compared to the original …King Khan might be a big superstar, but not an excellent actor. he does the same shit acting in almost every role I mean watch Rab ne bana di Jodi, Dilwale dulhania le jayenge,dil to pagal hai, kuch kuch hota hai and many others you’ll see the same SRK in each one; same expressions.. he’s a show off he has been the same boring lover chocolate boy for 15 years I think since 2000 he has forgotten totally how to act The thing is, when you’re sitting and watching a Shah Rukh Khan movie, it does not evoke the same sense of entertainment that it used to 5 years or 10 years back. Something has changed about him and believe me if Aamir will continue surprising us with Blockbusters he will kick SRK out of Bollywood n everyone will be in aamir’s side…Aamir has always been much better than SRK even in the 90s he was alwys more powerful had more energy onscreen n far more talented than SRK but media has never supportd him in his ealy career the media, god, luck, big directors had always been in king khan’s side BUT NOT ANYMORE he was always hyped by media n public that public had forgotten Aamir. its now that public is recognizing Aamir’ talent due to his different roles. The media is keeping Shahrukh alive but he will soon be no more. Only one flop is enough to reject him. He was known globally bcoz of his romanic movies.

  • ############13th part#####

    But now He is like an old prostitute. No taste and no charm. Lets see if public will accept him in different category of movies. My name is khan is an example it did just an average business in india that proves that public is fed up with SRK it seems that he lost his power or else why MNIK didn’t become a blockbuster despite the high expectations many expected that it would syrpass the record of 3 idiots!!? N for all those who believe that MNIK is SRK’S best movie till date they should rethink their opinion. The reason I say this is because as an Actor when you see a script and you are working on the protrayal of that character you should research that character (this is part of your ‘method acting’ – na!). The character he played in MNIK is someone with Aspergers Syndrome (apparently), people with this disease appear completely normal from the outside but have many social phobias. In the movie the social phobias were explained quite thoroughly however the director and SRK missed the point that these people appear like any other walking down the street-yes there are severities of the disease but this point is pretty consistent. In my opinion it just made it easier for SRK to present this character with a marked ‘walk’ so people could tell there was something different. On the other hand compare this direction with TZP and even the little boy’s character (which he protrayed very well) in which it would appear that this just a spoiled kid however when you look deeper there is more to it and that is where the difference lies in the 2 movies! In fact When I watched My Name Is Khan, I loved the movie but didn’t care for SRK’s performance, it was Kajol’s performance that rocked that movie. I have clients that have Aspergers and let me tell you SRK completely missed the boat becasue he loves to over act and he did not portray someone with Aspergers, it was a very fictionalized SRK version of the character (very upsetting to those that know this by the way!).So SRK’s fans jst forget abt my name is khan, he tried his best to do a different role BUT…King khan is now just hiding and praising his ancient movies, his game is over. Besides he looks old now and romantic roles doesn’t suit him he will never succeed in diff genre of movies since public love him in romantic roles only He fails everytime he tries a different role just watch him in Josh n Don he was soo fake . He’s not also good lookin! His unbelievable charisma n his mad skills in public relations is what attracts audience and make them luv him…BUT honestly I don’t really like him… so srk’s fans stop crying and face reality the king khan is gone!

  • ############14th part#####

    Aamir :7: jo jeeta wohi sikandar, rangeela; raja Hindustani; ghulam, lagaan;rangDe n 3 idiots he truly deserved to win all these ones but sadly it didn’t happen coz since 2000 SRK-Hrithik-Amitabh sequence started and I think it will continue maybe next year it’ll be Hrithik as he’s releasing 2 films ….unfortunatly that’s why aamir give them a damn**** I salute him coz he’s too away from all this and did his work honestly and give us really entertaining and inspiring movies he’s tatally right to not be interested in such fake awards he doesn’t need these cheapest awards he’s above these which do not recognize the real talent .No wonder he does not show up in those functions…that further proves his wisdom and excellence…that does not really matter if he didn’t win all these coz we all know he deserved them.. after all Awards don’t decide the fate for anyone…. they are just a small recognition of talents He is the best actor in Bollywood today(after amitabh), and is one of the most versatile actors ever he gives his best In every role it’s really hard to choose his best performance coz he’s always Excellent in every role but my favourite is LAGAAN. His social skills are average that’s why he is not very popular among public..but he might emerge as the leading impresario the way George Clooney has in Hollywood n this man is good looking n sexy his screen presence is impressive despite his short height , (just like al pachino) he’s still look young n can romance new heroines it’s really hard to notice that he’s 46 years old and that will help him to rock more and continue his career god bless him..jst waiting for his new projects…

  • ############15th part#####
    Hrithik 3: kaho na pyaar hai; koi mil gaya; n jodha he was excellent in all these ones I’m happy he won all of them but I’m sad he won it for DHOOM 2 it’s totally rubbish hope they won’t repeat it again he is very good in acting but not the best n talkin about VERSATILITY sadly he is not yet VERSATILE as I mentioned he has to work more n more to reach it n give a try to comic roles, drama, n other different ones…but hrithik is truly handsome, hot, sexy he has a good body n he’s the best dancer in Bollywood just watch him dancing you’ll forget everything..n most importantly he is a fantastic n very talented actor I liked him in many roles n he’s undoubtedly sooooo much better than SRK I’m sure that he’s jealous of Hrithik since 2000 everytime Hrithik has beaten him and walked awaywith the black lady SRK looks like saying “how did this guy come n destroyed my career just die n leave me alone to rule Bollywood forever” he’s his biggest enemy now along with Aamir who is frightening him every year with his Blockbusters n mindblowing performances only aamir’s name is enough to make him tremble lool he kicked his ass not only in box office but also in acting skills n htrithik with just 10 years of work and from the first film left him behind and became a bigger superstar go Hrithik go Aamir..

    Saif:one of my favourite actors well he seems to be getting better in each role if you compare his performances during the 1990s n now you’ll see a huge improvement his best is Hum Tum n he actually won A National award for it (though I don’t think he was that great in it but he was very good) the FilmUnfair didn’t even nominate him! How shame..he was also good in Parineeta, Love aaj kal, Kurbaan and especially OMKARA which is according to me was an unparalleled performance best performance in a NEGATIVE role EVER…all the best <3
    Ajay;3 : company and once upon a time in Mumbai unfortunately he didn’t won any award for these performances it’s always shah who’s bagging them it’s fraud really!! Very versatile actor ..great acting skills he gave an unbelievable performance in Story of Baghat Singh well this man is truly the ugly-TALENTED like Nana patekar, manoj..etc this kind of actors cannot be superstars they are only loved when they r in superhit movies, Otherwise public is always after handsome heros. When u buy a ticket its the hero that forces u to do so bcoz u dont really know how the movie will be because the physics matters and racism will exist everywhere people will always give a big importance to looks and want always a handsome hero in films but He’s truly exellent in acting he speaks through his eyes..i really like this actor

  • ############16th part#####
    Salman n akshay: 0; because they do not know how to act especially salman everyone has to shut up about him , when we are discussing about awards for acting ( Male ), please do not bring up Salman’s name. The guy might be a stud, a handsome dude..but plz for god’s sake…u can’t speak of him and acting in the same breath…We cannot ignore the blockbusters he gave during the 90s but in this decade he was nothing believe me he’s among those weak actors who give hit movies after a decade he’s only good at action .Most of the times salman overacts or exaggerates on screen Filmfare was never unfair to him his ego saved him many times and that was the case of dabangg though I think he was quite good in it as Robin hood Pandey he suited the role immensely his performance was good but not excellent neither the best.. just watch his earlier movies and you’ll understand: did anyone watch him in andaz apna apna he acted poorly compared with Aamir the movie remains among the best only because of Aamir or else it would be a forgettable one ..try to give him some different roles and you’ll see how he sucks; still can’t understand why does he have this huge number of FANS following n alwyz going like “oh sallu bhai you’re the best I ,love you blah blah blah…” To be really honest when talkin about KHANS we should never mention salman or SRK we better talk about Aamir or saif those are the one who matter unfortunately sallu’s days r gone now …should forget about him..

  • ############17th part#####
    Akshay is not bad has some acting skills his expressions are quite good also but he’s not intelligent In selecting his roles, works only on quantity : always action hero during the 90s and silly comedies during the 2000s Tell me one movie where Askhay has scored big with his performance and its not funny. Just look at how many comedy shows are in out there. If someone is comedy king then he is either Kader khan or Govinda he has done though some different roles like Namstey London n waqt but these weren’t perfect performances so he has to choose roles which show his talent and must reduce the number of films I mean what’s the use of making 4;5 suck films per year without any excellence he must concentrate and work more on his performances and stop working for money it’s the quality what really matters I admire aamir and Hrithik who make just one or two films per year with excellence….

    Shahid n Ranbir: both are superb, actually Shahid reminds me of a young Aamir he is following the same steps: less films than others, fantastic performances but they’re totally unfair wid him jst like Aamir in the 1990’s and he’s getting better with each role he was EXELLENT in Kaminey n the film was great as for Ranbir he’s very talented and good looking he gave many good performances but I felt that Filmfare is favoring Ranbir very much don’t get me wrong but Shahid was much better than Ranbir in 2009 n deserved the critics award But stiil I wish I will hear them winning the best actor award one day it will be cool seeing such, fresh, handsome, talented; future superstars rewarded.. all the best for both…

    *My top Five actors:
    1-Aamir Khan (the best n the most talented mad acting skills I’ve already explained why; he’s my lagaan<3)
    2-Hrithik Roshan(very good actor n superstar the future of the industry I luv him )
    3-saif ali khan(very good in acting)
    4-shahid Kapoor (future superstar n excellent dancer just like Hrithik)
    5-ranbir Kapoor(this man is talented just with few films n in 4 years he proved himself as one of the most stylish actors)

  • ############LASTpart#####
    Don’t get me wrong people BUT,
    I think looks,personality n dancing took you only so far for male actors n held you back from recognizing the real meaning of acting n talent I have never said that Hrithik’s good looks or dancing should be a negative point to drag him down NEVER!; whaever he is today is due to his talent and hardworking tehre’s no doubt about that but even if Hrithik or Srk are your favourite actors that does not mean that you should support them at any case n that they must win every year for dancing or romancing girls ok? Aamir is my favourite but I didn’t say that he deserved to be rewarded for each role when Hrithik was very good in Jodhaa, koi mil gaya n kaho naa pyar hai I admitted it with humility though Aamir is the best for me anyday but fact is fact and must be accepted by everyone without hardfeelings BUT in 2006 Aamir was faaar better than Hrithik n he deserved all the honors that year you too have to accept that after all we all know why he was ignored n if hrithik can do a film like lagaan, dil chahta hai, or RDB , TZP or 3 idiots(all commercial n critical successes) then I will agree with you that Hrithik is the best. Hrithik is very good as I said but Aamir is far better in the quality of films he gives and acting abilities , actors who do Science fiction films are not considered the best in Hollywood today..because there they give more importance to the quality of acting ..believe me If AK has changed his attitude he would have bagged the 7 best actor awards that I mentioned for sure but I’m happy that he’s above all these fake bought so called AWARDS keep it up Aamir n don’t worry your talent speaks volumes; I am just tired of evryone thinking so highly of SRK or Hrithik (especially SRK). not that have a problem with them(I love Hrithik very much), but when they praise them and bash Aamir they seem to totally forget what Aamir has also contributed to Indian Cinema. Aamir has the guts to finance films that are not financially viable, which is one of the reasons I respect him so much..I’m not forcing anyone to adopt my ideas but I think we must grow up and appreciate talent rather than personality n looks we should be honest with ourselves Bollywood is getting down today because of our lack of taste it’s so sad that we’re not appreciating people who are hoisting the industry n making it better , that’s my opinion n I gave my strong arguments I think by the way if someone has problems wid me…he can call me…00393204777264…from italy….cheers!

  • Well let’s see when Aamir deserved it:
    1989: Anil Kapoor for Tezaab-Very well deserved, Anil gave an outstanding performance, Qaymat Se Qaymat Tak was Aamir’s first film he was nominated best actor and he won the best debut award which was the first time, that it was given
    1990:Jackie Shroff for Parinda-He deserved it although Aamir’s acting was praised in Rakkh but it was a decent film and Jackie was Exellent in Painda
    1991: Sunny Deol for Ghayal- Well deserved, Aamir was Good in Dil but sunny was better
    1992:Amitji for Hum-Nope he didn’t deserve it it was Sunjubaba, Aamir was also good in Dil Hai Ki manta Nahin
    1993:Anil Kapoor dor Beta-totally deserved but I want to pay tribute to Aamir khan’s superb performance in jo Jeeta Wohi Sikandar, and I thin if Anil Kapoor wasn’t there Aamir would and should have surely won
    1994:SRK for Baazigar-Nope he should have won it for kabhi haan kabhi naa he was excellent in it, and Aamir wsa also very good in Hum Hain Rahi Pyaar Ki
    1995: Nana Patekar for Krantiveer-Of course but wanted to mention Aamir’s unforgettable performance in Andaz Apna Apna
    1996: SRK for DDLJ- I Object, SRK was very good no doubt but not better than Aamir’s INCREDIBLE performance in Rangeela and Akele Hum Akele Tum this was truly the year when Aamir deserved to win
    1997:Aamir Khan for Raja Hindustani-Well deserved, even though I think he deserved it for the previous year for Rangeela more but in Raja Hindustani he was Great and I wanted to pay tribute to Sunny Deol’s performance in Ghatak
    1998:SRK for Dil To Pagal Hai-Noooooooooooo the worst decision ever none than Anil Kapoor for Virsaat of course
    1999: SRK for Kuch Kuch Hota Hai-He was good but I think Ajay devgan for Zakhm or Aamir Khan for Ghulam were more deserving
    2000:Sunjay Dutt for Vaastaav-Very well deserved, the best of Sunjubaba but Aamir also was at his best in Sarfarosh they both were outstanding
    2001:Hrithik Roshan for Kaho Na Pyaar Hai-He deserved it for sure, don’t tell about SRK’s overacting in Mohabbatein, if there’s someone who really acted there so it’s Big B, SRK stands nowhere
    2002-Aamir Khan for Lagaan-Very well deserved, great performance in a great film, but Sunny deol was also good in Gadar
    2003-SRK for Devdas- NO NO NO NO NEVER!!!!! How the hell can they dare ignore Ajay devgan in Legend of Baghat Singh and Company he was incredible
    2004-Hrithik Roshan for Koi Mil Gaya- Well well derserved no question about it, Salman and SRK were very good but pale in comparison with Hrithik
    2005-SRK for Swades-He deserved it he was excellent In it, but so was Amitji in Khakhee and also Saif Ali Khan in Hum Tum
    2006-Amitabh Bachchcan for Black-Of course, no question about it Aamir was definetly excellent in Mangal Pandey but amitji was unbelievable in Black
    2007-Hrithik Roshan for Dhoom 2- NOOOOOOOOOPE a totally wrong decision, the award should be given to Aamir khan for Rang De Basanti no question of raising a single doubt about that, as for Hrithik’s performance I can’t comment I still can’t be convinced why he was even nominated!
    2008-SRK for ShakDeIndia- very well deserved SRK proved his excellence in Chak De but also Darsheel Safarey was incredible in taare Zameen Par
    2009-Hrithik Roshan for Jodhaa Akbar-deserved it but it was a toss up between Aamir and Hrithik they were excellent
    2010:Amitabh Bachchan for Paa-he deserved it for sure second were Aamir and Shahid I don’t understand why they didn’t win the critics award
    2011: SRK for MNIK-definetly no he overacted a lot and as usual he acted the way he is confortable in the award should definitely have been given to Ajay Devgan for Once Upon A Time In Mumbai

  • I think filmfare should be called yash n karan fare. Itz disgusting to see actor of aamir calibre has won only two awards n srk 7.filmfare should go oscar type of voting and then it will regain sum credibility.

  • Well SRK and Hrithik Roshan are the two pillars of Indian cinema . They rock the show. The fact that Akshay Kumar and Salman Khan haven’t won any best actor award show that the awards are probably centred around established production houses like Dharma Productions and YRF.

    No award can be without controversy and the dominance of SRK and Hrithik Roshan do bring the topic of favouritism. Even Saif Ali Khan hasn’t won any filmfare best actor award.However he has won the National award for Hum Tum. Dhoom 2 wasn’t a movie of substance but Hrithik won the best actor award where as in that year Ajay Devgan gave a stunning performance in Omkara.

    All said and done Filmfare is the oldest and most establihed award in India. It has been mor eor less fare and in the coming years also it will give rise to controversies though the black lady luck will bring joy to some fortunates.

  • Amitabh bachan is not desrverd for best actor in 2005 and 2010 .In 2010 amir khan film 3 idiots rocks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.Amir deserves for best actor in 2010.akshy kumar is really not deserved for best actor becoz he is over acting shows in his films.Now srk is really superstar and i pray for him to win more best actor awards!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Hritikh roshan is just a good dancer but his acting is very bad in 3 films kahoo na pyar ha………..,koi mill gaya and krissh.srk is best actor in bollywood and really a king of the world!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Sharukh is not great actor in india.becoz indian people can,t judge is acting,only out of india people can judge is acting

  • actually all of u r jealous of SRK. SRK is d best actor of all time. he is the only person who came 4m Non-filmy background and got d top position in bollywood today. aur jaha tak salman, amir, saif ya hrithik ki baat hai, ye sab to apne filmi background ki wajah filmo me aaye hai. warna ye log to junior artist ke kaabil bhi nhi hai.

  • After hrithik roshan that one men is coming and his name is john Abraham who diserve the national award for doom…

  • AS YOU KNOW HRITHIK ROSHAN IS BEST ACTOR IN INDIAN CINEMA . WHEN I SAW THE FILM OF HRITHIK ROSHAN AND HIS NAME KRRISH. HE WAS THE FRIST INDIAN FILM WHOSE HAD PLAYED IN SUPER HERO ROLE .WE CAN COMPAIR THIS FILM FROM HOLLYWOOD AND SHOULD BE NOMINATIED FOR NATIONAL & OCAR AWARD.HRITHIK ROSHAN LOOKS LIKE AN FORNER ACTOR AND NO BODY CAN TOUCH THE HRITHIK LOOK……

  • just notice only two awards for the god of acting aamir khan
    SRGay has got 7 awards thanks to yashraj all awards for their camp
    Interesting point he got award for ddlj and not aamir khan for acting so perfectly
    This shows awards are fixed
    aamir khan should atleast have received award for ghajini 3 idiots ranjeela rang de basanti Jo jeeta wohi sikandar sarfarosh but surprised just hugely critically and commercially superhit movies with great acting by aamir none single award to him

  • I am totally agree that Film fare Award is paid. Film Fare do not respect actors. Ajay Devgn should have won award for his best performance in Bhaghat Singh, Company, Omkara, Once Upon A time in Mumbai and so on……. Similarly,

  • Filmare is paid by SRK every time he won silly awards. He is good but not best. Ajay, Amir were best than SRK. It is better to courier award to SRK’s Home why to lost money in too much formality. so bad film fare. make it corret. Ajay and others best////

  • Rani Mukherjee is one of the top actresses of Bollywood. Infact, when it comes to Indian cinema, she is a personality who truly deserves a special mention. She was born on the 21st of March in the year 1978 in Bengal. Today, Rani Mukherji is one of the highest paid actresses of the Indian film industry. She won the Filmfare award for three consecutive years from 2004 to 2006. In totality, she has achieved six Filmfare awards. Well, in this article, I will present you with the biography of Bollywood actress Rani Mukherjee. it”s me ahmed abdukadir sherif liki jaazos

  • Filmfare i think is the most relieable and biggest awards of hindi cinema.Today we see dozens of different institutions distributing awards ,but film fare occupies a pivotal position.The whole of india wait for the result of film fare which is prove of its popularity.I just don,t undestand why ome people blame film fare for its decisions.It is said that every year Shahrukh khan is given award ,but record is telling a different story.Shahrukh was not awarded for Mohabbatain, Veer zara and Don, thses were the super hit movies and king khan had performed extra ordinary but he was not given awards for these movies.Than why some people are jealous with mr shahrukh Khan.I think we should be open minded and accept the truth that today Shahrukh is the most popular and famous actor , he fully deserves all the awards that he has achieved so far.Its unfair to say that he wins the awards just because he pays for it for such people i would say that in bollywood Abishik bachan has more money and relations than Shahrukh ,than why he is not given an award sofar whikle he is son of a popular man like Amitabh bachan.Ok i beleive that some times the decisions are not agreeable when Amir is not given best actor award for movies like Tare Zameen Per or Three Idiots, film fare awards jury should think about its decision that why such great performances were ignored,but even than it dose not mean that one should reject all the result.It is not fair.

  • srk is the most stupid actor in bollywood history …………………
    And Hrithik is the best of all actors present till date………
    SO HRITHIK ROCKS and srk socks………….

Leave a Comment