History: Filmfare Best Actor Awards

Filmfare Awards introduced in the year 1954 is the oldest and the most coveted trophy of the Hindi Film Industry also known as Bollywood. Out of more than 20 categories and trophies presented each year, the Filmfare Best Actor Award is something that the whole industry and fans look forward to. Its also the most fiercely competed and discussed category, as those nominated for the Best Actor award are usually a combination of immense popularity and talent.

The Filmfare Best Actor records

  • Dilip Kumar has been nominated 19 times and won 8 awards. The legend is also the only actor to win 3 back to back awards.
  • Shahrukh Khan has been nominated 30 times (all categories) and has won the Best Actor award 8 times, a record which he shares with Dilip Kumar.
  • Amitabh Bachchan has been nominated for a record 29 times but has won just 5 awards.
  • Hrithik Roshan has been nominated 9 times and has won 4 trophies. Hrithik is the first and only actor to win both the Best Actor and Best Debut awards in the same year (for Kaho Na Pyaar Hai). And the first actor to win both the Best Actor critics and popular award (for Koi Mil Gaya).
  • Rajesh Khanna has received 14 nominations and has won just 3.

The Top 5 received Best Actor awards for

  • Dilip Kumar – Daag, Azaad, Devdas, Naya Daur, Kohinoor, Leader, Ram Aur Shyam and Shakti
  • Shahrukh Khan – Baazigar, Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayenge, Dil To Pagal Hai, Kuch Kuch Hota Hai, Devdas, Swades, Chak De India, My Name Is Khan.
  • Amitabh Bachchan – Amar Akbar Anthony, Don, Hum, Black and Paa.
  • Hrithik Roshan – Kaho Naa Pyaar Hai, Koi Mil Gaya, Dhoom 2 and Jodha Akbar.
  • Rajesh Khanna – Saccha Jhoota, Anand and Aavishkaar

Other Filmfare Best Actor Award Facts

  • Aamir Khan has received 16 nominations but won just 2.. Aamir doesnt attend Indian award functions (except the National Award) as he feels they lack credibility and consistency.
  • Salman Khan and Akshay Kumar have never won a Filmfare Best Actor Award.

Full list of Filmfare Best Actor winners 1954 – 2009

  • 1954 – Dilip Kumar (Daag)
  • 1955 – Bharat Bhooshan (Shri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu)
  • 1956 – Dilip Kumar (Azaad)
  • 1957 – Dilip Kumar (Devdas)
  • 1958 – Dilip Kumar (Naya Daur)
  • 1959 – Dev Anand (Kala Pani)
  • 1960 – Raj Kapoor (Anari)
  • 1961 – Dilip Kumar (Kohinoor)
  • 1962 – Raj Kapoor (Jis Desh Men Ganga Behti Hai)
  • 1963 – Ashok Kumar (Rakhi)
  • 1964 – Sunil Dutt (Mujhe Jeene Do)
  • 1965 – Dilip Kumar (Leader)
  • 1966 – Sunil Dutt (Khandaan)
  • 1967 – Dev Anand (Guide)
  • 1968 – Dilip Kumar (Ram Aur Shyam)
  • 1969 – Shammi Kapoor (Brahmachari)
  • 1970 – Ashok Kumar (Ashirwad)
  • 1971 – Rajesh Khanna (Sacha Jhutha)
  • 1972 – Rajesh Khanna (Anand)
  • 1973 – Manoj Kumar (Be-Imaan)
  • 1974 – Rishi Kapoor (Bobby)
  • 1975 – Rajesh Khanna (Aavishkar)
  • 1976 – Sanjeev Kumar (Aandhi)
  • 1977 – Sanjeev Kumar (Arjun Pandit)
  • 1978 – Amitabh Bachchan (Amar Akbar Anthony)
  • 1979 – Amitabh Bachchan (Don)
  • 1980 – Amol Palekar (Golmaal)
  • 1981 – Naseeruddin Shah (Aakrosh)
  • 1982 – Naseeruddin Shah (Chakra)
  • 1983 – Dilip Kumar (Shakti)
  • 1984 – Naseeruddin Shah (Masoom)
  • 1985 – Anupam Kher (Saaransh)
  • 1986 – Kamal Haasan (Saagar)
  • 1987 – Due to security reasons, the awards ceremony was not held.
  • 1988 – Due to security reasons, the awards ceremony was not held.
  • 1989 – Anil Kapoor (Tezaab)
  • 1990 – Jackie Shroff (Parinda)
  • 1991 – Sunny Deol (Ghayal)
  • 1992 – Amitabh Bachchan (Hum)
  • 1993 – Anil Kapoor (Beta)
  • 1994 – Shah Rukh Khan (Baazigar)
  • 1995 – Nana Patekar (Krantiveer)
  • 1996 – Shah Rukh Khan (Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge)
  • 1997 – Aamir Khan (Raja Hindustani)
  • 1998 – Shah Rukh Khan (Dil To Pagal Hai)
  • 1999 – Shah Rukh Khan (Kuch Kuch Hota Hai)
  • 2000 – Sunjay Dutt (Vaastav)
  • 2001 – Hrithik Roshan (Kaho Naa Pyar Hai)
  • 2002 – Aamir Khan (Lagaan)
  • 2003 – Shahrukh Khan (Devdas)
  • 2004 – Hrithik Roshan (Koi Mil Gaya)
  • 2005 – Shahrukh Khan (Swades)
  • 2006 – Amitabh Bachchan (Black)
  • 2007 – Hrithik Roshan (Dhoom 2)
  • 2008 – Shahrukh Khan (Chak De India)
  • 2009 – Hrithik Roshan (Jodha Akbar)
  • 2010 – Amitabh Bachchan (Paa)
  • 2011 – Shahrukh Khan (My Name Is Khan)
  • 2012 – Ranbir Kapoor (Rockstar)

Something for you to comment on

  • Any actor that you feel didnt deserve the Best Actor award for his performance in a film? (See the full list above)
  • Do you think Filmfare has been unfair to the likes of Salman Khan, Aamir Khan, Akshay Kumar or any particluar actor?
  • Since 2000, the Best Actor awards have surrounded around Shahrukh Khan (3) and Hrithik Roshan (4), are they truly the best actors today?
  • Do you think Filmfare is ignoring great performances in smaller and less popular films? Like Naseeruddin Shah for A Wednesday, Rajeev Khandelwal for Aamir in 2009?
  • Should Filmfare ditch the current system of 50% Jury and 50% audience votes; and give more importance to critical acclaim than popularity / mass appeal of a film / performance / actor?
Advertisements

205 Comments

  • Hi All,

    I think I am the biggest fan of Shahrukh Khan, I can’t miss his any film until I died! Please don’t think bad about Shahrukh, he is a fantastic actor. But It is true that sometimes Filmfare judges makes mistakes, like they should awarded SRK ‘Best actor’ for Mohabbatein instead of Hrithik for Kahona pyar hai in 2000, Salman Khan should have awarded for Tere Naam instead of Hrithik Roshan for Koi mil gaya in 2003, again Salman Khan should hve been awarded for Phir Milenge instead of my favourite SRK in 2004. Hrithik didn’t deserve a Best Actor award for Dhoom-2, he did negative role in that movie but won lead actor role, really shame on Filmfare, flying and showing Karate action and dancing is not called acting! Rather they could give him award for Krrish in the same year but Aamir Khan was the most fit man to get that year award for his extraordinary acting in Fanaa, actually whenever Aamir does a movie he do the best! Agree with me or not, even though I am a hard-core fan of SRK, I will say that as per acting, No one can compete with Aamir Khan even Mr. Amitabh Bachchan can’t act brilliantly and with full dedication like Aamir Khan. He is handsome, chocolaty, hard-working, smart, macho (latest) actor, he shoyld be awarded as Best Actor for his every film, because he does great in every film, it’s true, but even though Aamir is superior in the class of acting I like Shahrukh over him, why I don’t know, I am a crazy fan of SRK like many crazies! I also like Salman Khan, he acted seriously not only in Tere Naam, but in Maine Pyaar Kiya, Patthar ke phool, Love, Hum Aapke hai kaun, Karan Arjun, Hum saat saat hai, Khamoshi, Hum dil de chuke Sanam, Veergati, Phir milenge and many more but its true that sometimes he is careless about his acting skills and does bullshit otherwise how he won an award for Kuch Kuch hota hai, he did great indeed in that movie. At the end, I want to say that Khans are the leading and top actors in bollywood, whole world know them, some people like Salman some like Aamir and some like ShahRukh that’s it, so don’t fight or debate for them. They are just entertaining us, not our relatives! All the 3 Khans are genious, they no need to be jealouse for each other, because if this year Aamir gives biggest hit, next year may be Shahrukh will give or Salman also. Okay, No hurts, no fights only enjoy good movies, please!

  • hi 2 every one. i think filmfare should separate films into some categories like romance,action,comedy,thriller and so on, so that every 1 can get what he deserves, and thats the biggest problem that some actors do not gain for their pain example an actor like srk acts a good romantic film in a year. that another actor acts a good action film who r u going to award srk or a child film like doom2 which a negative role actor won , i think some actors like sunil shetty,sunny deol, hrithik roshan, akshay kumar boby deol and salman khan should should give up romantic films for the desevable actors like srk,aamir khan, amitab and so many good actors in the bollywood who never won it but could win if there are no such actors who preventing them to win but act so stupid films and filmfare should give every action award to aksha kumar and hrithik and i should tell actors like salman khan govinda to compit and fight for comedy films, and join johny lever and his group. thats all…. i hope filmfare could improve and compit the hollywood bye am out

  • look i know dat many agree to the system of 50% jury n 50%audiences but mi views here are a bit different i know dat mi comments might be a little awkward but this is da way it is.the voting should be 100% audience. give it a try atleast once who knows it might work after all it is the audiences who watch movies let the janta decide their favourite. im not sayin dat jury is not fair but it is just mi my way of thinkin n if this system doesnt work then switch bak to the old one wats the hassle!!!as far as the above list is concerned dilip kumar rightly said, a legend but i think filmfare was unfair to amitabh bachchan he couldve had a lot more in his bag even anil kapoor and akshay kumar could have counted on a lot more. shah rukh for devdas and swades was simply ridiculous!!! i dont hate shah rukh on the contrary i would say that he shouldve got it for don .he was amazin in it but there are a lot more talents to be recognised. this award shud not be given for liking of a particular star but for the intenseness in acting of a particular star.

  • i think raj kiran and rahul roy one of the best actor in bollywood history.they deserved all best actors awards.

  • i think rahul roy is one of the legend bollywood actor.Many good films on his credit such as ashiqui,phir teri kahani yaad ayee,dilwale kabhy na hare,manjhdhar,janum,junoon etc. he is a legend acctor just like dilip kumar,salman khan,srk,amir khan and amitabh bachan.

  • i think award are fixed. for ex. 2009 , aamir khan played a very difficult role and noone can challenge his acting ,, is hritik better then aamir? ”’NO CHANCE”’….. it is a request from an indian that please choose the right and don’t give us a heart…..

  • Filmfare should give Dilip kumar Best actor Award for Gunga Jumna.

    Filmfare should give Rajendra kumar Best ACTOR AWARD FOR FILMS LIKE ‘Aarzoo,& Saathi.

  • i think it all changed after 1995
    lets see who won and who deserved
    1 . 1995 – shahrukh khan – DDLJ – aamir khan – akele hum akele tum [most controversial one ,aamir deserved the award]
    2. 1996 – aamir khan – raja hindustani – chandrachur singh – maachis [ why was aamir given award for consolation or what]
    3. 1997 – shahrukh khan – dtph – anil kapoor – virasat [ why was he not given the award – the most stupid decision not to award kapoor for his fantastic performane in virasat – real shame man]
    4 . 1998 – shahrukh khan – kkht – aamir khan – ghulam[ again the movie was given priorty and performance]
    5 . 1999 – sanjay dutt – vastav – he deserved this waward
    6 . 2000 – hritik roshan – knph – he too deserved the award
    7. 2001 – aamir khan – lagaan – deserved it
    8 . 2002 – shahrukh khan – devdas – deserved it
    9 .2003 – hrotik roshan – koi mil gaya – deserved it
    10 . 2004 – shahrukh khan – swadesh – hritik roshan – lakshya
    11. 2005 – amit ji – black – deserved
    12.2006 – hritik – dhoom – aamir khan – rang de basanti
    13 .2007 – srk – chak de – deserved it
    14 .2008 – hritik – jhoda akbar – deserved it

  • Hrithik deserves the award he win, also I think Hrithik deserve the award for Lakshya.
    It more difficult role than SRK in Swades.

  • Salman Khan deserves an awards for Judwaa, Pyar kiya toh darna kya, Hum dil dechuke saman, partner, veer gati, Hum aapke hai kaun which is biggest hit in indian history cinema.
    For Karan Arjun he deserves the best actor award. Film fare are doing favour to Yash Raj, Johar’s and to SRK for giving awards. SRK doesnot deserve one filmfare award except Chakde. Dilip Saab the legend deserves awards. Filmfare ignored best actor awards for Dharmendra and Salman khan. Filmfare is not fair at all. Aamir is right in not attending the filmfare awards. Every Year Salman, Aamir deserve awards but filmfare ignores and gives it to Yashraj banners and SRK.

  • filmfare award is used to result of “JUGAAD”.Therefore some actors are awarded more than one time ,while many deserving actors like jublee kumar were never in the list of these types of awards.People’s love and support is the most vital power,it can transform one from just an actor to a SUPERSTAR and that happened with Rajendra Kumar also.However he did not get any Filmfare award but his biggest achivement was that he was awarded the title of JUBLEE KUMAR from the heart of people!!!!Phir toh Filmfare award ka koi matlab nahi hota hai!!!!!Rakhe rahiye apna filmfare award apne paas showcase mein,Rajendra Kumar Jublee star the hai aur rahenge.

  • The fact that since 2000s, only SRK and Hrithik have been getting it is somewhat vexing to me. There’s lots of great performances that should’ve deserved some credit. Look at Academy Awards. The most best actor awards they’ve given to a person is 2. I’m not saying that he should limit SRK and Hrithik but I they should really look out for other performances. For instance, Hrithik for Dhoom 2? I just dont see how that movie was a blockbuster. Aamir for RDB should’ve gotten it with Sanjay Dutt as the runner up for LRMB. SRK for Chak de. I agree his performance was great but Darsheel in TZB was one for the records!! Hrithik for JA?? I was almost certain this time the award would go to Aamir Khan for Ghajini….as the was his best performance ever…but again Filmfare sticks to the routine. Which brings me to 2010 Filmfare Awards…..since SRK will not be releasing any movie in 2009, I’m wonder if Hrithik will get it for Kites. But I would really like to see a new face win this time……hopefully Salman Khan (Wanted) or Aamir Khan (3 Idiots), maybe even Shahid Kapoor (Kaminey) or Abhieshek Bachchan (Delhi 6)

  • salman khan deserved award for
    1989 – maine pyaar kiya
    1994 – hum aapke hain koun
    1995 – karan arjun
    1996 – khamoshi
    1998 – pyar kiya to darna kiya
    1999 – hum dil de chuke sanam or hum saat saat hain
    2003 – tere naam
    2004 – phir milenge
    2009 – WANTED

  • Can u guys c girls being crazy about Salman Khan, all I can say that Salman will definetely get the best actor filmfare award for Wanted, all da very best to Salman.Everybody must learn this even Dilip Kumar appreciate Salman’s acting skills, he has the ability to do a tough scene with an ease.

    Amitabh is the best actor of bollywood, just 4 awards don’t justify Amitabh.

    And hats off to Hrithik, I guess he’ll become the most complete actor ever of bollywood.

    I do believe Shahrukh deserved the national award for Swades’ instead of Saif for ‘hum tum’.

    Amir deserves more awards.

    I’m happy Ajay has won many national awards, I liked Akshay in Sangharsh.

    All I wanna say U guys must understand this that Filmfare is more into giving awards to commercialy successfull movies.

    And I request Indicine team to avoid ‘Khann’ kinda people and ABD stop supporting Khann.

  • i think Saharukh khan deserves best actor for the movie “Ashoka “,”Kal ho na ho”,”Kabhi khusi kabhi gam” and never the less “Rab ne bana di jodi”.
    Amir khan also deserves best actor for “Sarfarosh”,and “Jo jita bahi sikandar”

  • Janbaz about SRK
    king khan is the best , the greatest ,the most popular,and I couldn’t fined any great word to say about him.
    by the way whoever say any thing about him but he is not the king of bollywood he is the King of World in acting and playing I am too excited I can’t stop writing about him…………….
    best actor? alywas
    best action movies? of cours
    best lover movies? really
    all the movies are the best ? absolutly wright
    and more than these.

  • where are the awards for:

    ajay devgan for Omkara
    salman khan for tere naam
    aamir khan for whenever he release a movie, because he is the best actor of bollywood I think, he should when the award whenever he is actor in a film.

    shahrukh khan has his own role and it is always the same lover. and when he deserve it he do not have the award like for kal ho na hoo, mohabatein, khabi khushi khabi gham.

    real actors are ajay devgan, aamir khan or akshay kumar, they are good in every kind of role, they can be funny, action or romantic,

    I think filmfare awards is not always fare…

  • Well, i like to comment on certain things,the filmfare group have been unfair not only in the present scenario but also in the past.There is no doubt that Dilip Kumar, one of the finest actors but he was not deserving all the time.
    Instead of Dilip Kumar for Daag, it should have been to Balraj Sahani for Do Bhiga Zameen,in case of
    Azaad,well it was a cake walk over Jhagte Raho.Same is the case with Kohinoor,it could have been to
    Kabuliwala for Balraj Sahani.
    Dharmendera got completely ignored for Satyakam,Chupke Chupke,Ghulami.
    Sanjeev Kumar was deaserving for Khilona but got messsed up b/w Dilip Kumar and Rajesh Khanna over Gopi and Saccha Jhutha.
    Rajesh Khanna missed it for Avtaar to Nasser for Masoom.
    I just don’t imagine how come Rishi Kapoor won for Bobby,there were Amitabh Bachchan and Rajesh Khanna for Zanjeer and Namak Haram.But most of the unfairness started from 1989 filmfare awards
    which has reached to limit in recent times.

  • Since from its beginning film fare was not much fare about some actors or film. Balraj Sahni for kabooliwala, Dharmendra for Satyakam,Rajesh Khanna for Amarprem,Sanjeev Kumar for Kosish,Sharmila for Anupama,Deo Kumar for Sambadh were strong contender . Kadar khan most veteran actor has also not got awards. But what can you say about PRAN , HE STILL DID NOT GET DADA SAHEB falke award and bhupen hazarika has got awards. Do you know ,bhupen hazarika is basically singer who has sung 2 or three hindi song and 50 assameese song. so political and regional pressure some time decide the awards.

  • salman and akshay deserves for most times than hrithik and srk
    salman for maine pyar kiya,hum aapke hai kaun,khamoshi,pyar kiya to darna kya,hum dil de chuke sanam,tere naam,mujhase shadi karogi,wanted
    salman deserves for wanted & supporting for london dreams
    akshay for bhulbhulaiya,singh is king,dhadkan

  • salman and akshay deserves for most times than hrithik and srk
    salman for maine pyar kiya,hum aapke hai kaun,khamoshi,pyar kiya to darna kya,hum dil de chuke sanam,tere naam,mujhase shadi karogi,wanted
    salman deserves for wanted & supporting for london dreams
    akshay for bhulbhulaiya,singh is king,dhadkan.
    srk doesnt deserves for kkhh,devdas,chak de nd hrithik for dhoom2,jodha akbar

  • Super Star Rajesh Khanna 14 nomination and won 3 awards its great. Rajesh Khanna – The Greatest Living Legend and the real & only Super Star of Indian Cinema even today.

  • Hrithik is d god of acting.he is d actual king.king of romance,king of acting,king of dancing .he is d only actor who was deservein d best actor 56th award 4 guzaarish 4 his outstanding acting.he was btr dan srk in guzaarish.i hate srk.

  • for all those who are saying that hrithik is better than aamir and more versastile i agree that hrithi is a good actor actually he’s an exellent actor and a future superstar but better than aamir sorry it’s totallt rong he has to work more an more to match aamir in acting abilities just watch all aamir’s movies and then comment you’ll understand the meaning of the acting to be honest i loved Hrithik in aho na pyaar hai n Koi mil gaya n hated him in Dhoom 2 he wasn’t really good just about stunts, dancing, make up that was the hole idea of the film i don’t blame him he’s good but that’s not the perfect film that shows his acting skills and talent same for Krrish thought he was better in that one but still not real acting i mean did the actor of superman won the oscar of the best actor?? that’s rubbish but if you look in the same year you can see the talent of aamir in Fanaa n Rang de bsaanti that’s wat’s called acting especially in Rang de basanti real n natural acting same for Ghajini some may argue that he wasn’t really special but it actually was i mean when you watch the film it’s hard to recognize that it’s aamir he played the role perfectly it’s about how to make others beleive that it’s not you the actor but the character played in the film many didn’t notice how hard was the role the rage in his eyes it’s not easy to do such role can you imagine Hrithik instead of Aamir in Ghanini NEVER while i can assure that Aamir would have done the role of Akbar even better than Hrithik here i will ignore Sharukh because he will never be able to do a film like JA or Ghajini and those who said that Hrithik would have been better than aamir in Taare Zameen Par!! are you jokin man!!!!n what about the direction of the film loooool very funny would he really think about a film like taare zameen par i don’t think so an even if he did i can assure that the film wouldn’t succeed n now coming to 2009 n to 3 idiots; well we all know after all that Rancho deserved this one without any dound inspiring character n natural acting a 44 yar old man loooked like 20+ years old and did it perfectly we totally forgot that it’s the angry Sunjay Singhanya didn’t we i have no more to say after all everything is clear a +12 child can understand what’s goin on let us not speak about the -12 but don’t forget what aamir said in 3 idiots: Fellow exellence and success will chase you and taht’s the case of the great Aamir look at how he became successful without promoting himsef or calling himself the King he’s called the perfectionnist because of his talent and i’m sure everyone will notice his talent soon luv you Aamir Go man<3<3

  • INDICINE Team: loooool it’s clear you’re the biggest Hrithik Roshan fan hhh:D How can you put Hrithik’s performance in Jodhaa Akbar ahead of Naseer’s in a Wednesday?? and and how dare you debate Ranbir’s performance in Bachna Ae Haseeno against aamir’s Ghajini what a joke!!! He must be n°2 just after Nasser…n Hrithik was very good in Jodhaa Akbar but it wasn’t really that great perfoamnce that will be remembered 5 decades(as you said) soryy it seems that you’re favoring him a lot bcoz this performance wansn’t that good compared to Ko, Mil Gaya and Aamir’s performance in Ghajini was among his best for sure so you’re overrated really…
    Dr. RC Patel: well it was really a coincidence that I came to this site and started reading comments, I know I’m too late but must comment here : it seems that YOU are the biggest biased here against AAMIR or else how dare you say that Hrithik is better? Hrithik made you blind to not see other better actors….dancing and looks are not enough to make you a VERSATILE actor… I have never heard someone praising Hrithik that much as a great and Versatile actor n better than Aamir before!! and that too for D 2 n krrish, when you say he’s talented, a very good actor, has good body expressions, did many good performances, an excellent dancer, a handsome dude, a god greek looks I totally agree wid you, if you hav said that he’s the best for koi mil gaya you’re totally right, for kaho na pyaar hai also I would definetly agree with you he was the best especially in these two undoubtedly…BUT… ur comments made me laugh n discover that you are not able to appreciate what is the ACTING about when saying that he was better in krrish n D2 than Aamir in rangDe n Fanaa:D good joke hehehe, n sayin that Hrithik would hav done a better Fanaa!!!! (Are you kidding)?, RDB: (NO WAY), Ghajini(in your dreams) n what else? !!!TZP!!!!!!! Looool wake up Such films are only made by Genius like Aamir not ANYONE can make them !!!Hrithik as a supporting role in such film I don’t think so! do you think it’s that easy!! Aamir did the role of a teacher perfectly I don’t know why he didn’t win best supporting actor award it was one of the best performances by a supporting actor ever!!! Hrithik acted in Lakshya which was a crappy film and don’t get me wrong but his performance wasn’t good in it especially when you compare it with aamir’s in Dil chahta hai which was an excellent n amazing one that’s a clear example I think in fact he was much better In other films(KMG, KNPH..) n about Mangal Pandey it wasn’t Aamir’s fault that the film wasn’t very good in fact he gave an amazing performance but the thing is that the script wasn’t well writed and the direction wasn’t good at all when we take Jodhaa Akbar on the other hand and Hrithik’s performance as Akbar it actually had nothing ahead of Aamir’s as Mangal Pandey, the only difference is that Jodhaa Akbar was a much better film in all terms, well directed, well writed it was an amazing film so that worked with Hrithik..I totally agree with Aryan when he said that Aamir would have done much better than Hrithik in Jodhaa akbar, in fact the role of akbar suits him a lot he has enough of talent to excel in such role and if he could be aakash, bhuvan, Sunjay Singhanya, Rancho, DJ, Rehan n mangal pandey then why not Akbar n I believe he could even turned it a bigger hit why not after all he did it with the small budget TZP! if you know even a little about acting you would never make such satetment.. it’s totally a biase against Aamir someone should teach you the meaning of talent..n wait did someone dare to insult an actor of aamir’s caliber by pitting him against the joker Akshay Kumar n say that they both gave some different performances !!!BOTH!! how could this one put them in the same rank it’s indeed ridiculous! Go n get a life.. jst tell me when did akshay give a different role? From 2000 to 2010 just insane kiddish comedies n his acting was poor in Singh is Kinng compared to Aamir, Hrithik n Naseer n about rejecting his award n givin it to Aamir! what did he think? Doing such fake drama will influence audience and make him the most humble human being? did he think that Aamir would pay attention to such fake award n such droll play? it’s not even the best actor award it’s “the most popular award”!! that’s why he did all this scene, they promised him with the Best actor award if he performs on stage but it was the most popular actor so he declined it in a smart way actually it’s really funny to see him treating such award as the best actor award hahahaha! I bet if it was the best actor from fimlfare he would never do this! he was offended by that and so in order to give it back, he made this scene,, Good acting Akshay you rock…, may be i think you deserve an award for this performance.., STUPID.. I really appreciate, aamir, ajay, sunny, sanjay… etc for not being a part of these crappy award shows.. His praise to Aamir was just a political stupid stunt…all he did had no sense he should have accepted this one coz it’s the most popular actor his fans voted for him so he has to accept it n forget abt Aamir who’s miles ahead of him I’m sure Aamir was sitting in luxiour place n laughing at akshay’s stupidity..

  • ############2nd part#####
    Well let’s forget abt akshay now, I think only Aamir and Hrithik are the two best actors n superstars today, I’m happy that people are comparing Aamir n Hrithik ndidn’t mention SRK becoz even a blind person can feel that they both are better than him even ajay or saif are better actors than SRK;;BUT Aamir is ahead of all other actors his talent is far HIGHER than all others (exept Big B), he was the best during the 1990s and is still now he rulezzzz the industry today and that is god’s gift to him coz he suffered a lot in his early carreer n public, media were totally unfair to him after 2 decades we realized his talent. He is the only Indian actor that has managed to WOW me and many of my friends who are not even Indian. I have many colleagues who are now Aamir Khan fans but they don’t understand or speak a word of Hindi. I am their link to Aamir’s movies as they like to say and yes I keep them posted… as for Hrithik he is the future of BOLLYWOOD he is very good but he is from another generation gap that’s why we cannot deabte him against Aamir or else it would be a biase equally for the same reason we cannot say that Aamir is better than Big B so obviously Big B is better than Aamir and Aamir is better than Hrithik. Also Ranbir is a very promising actor he has almost the same qualities that Hrithik has but can we say that he’s better? Although he may become better in the future but now at this part of time he’s still considered as a debut in the first steps of his carrer isn’t he? Isn’t he talented though? So plz we have to be realist.. But still heard some here saying that Hrithik is “FAR BETTER THAN AAMIR” Are you kiddin man! Calm down people!! Did you suddenly forget what is the acting about?!!! I know you love Hrithik(actually I do so) n you feel that he’s the best but it’s TOTALLY wrong coz Aamir is definitely much BETTER in acting abilities, Hrithik is the junior and he has long way to go to match aamir, he has NEVER been as talented as aamir, Aamir is FAR better undoubtedly we dont have to fight here bcoz everybody knows it but prefer to remain silent. n Hrithik he is good n maybe EXELLENT sometimes but definitely not better than Aamir he is NOT yet versatile because he is not the kind of actor who is able to pull off ANY kind of role .;I have never seen him in a comic role yet can explain why??…he’s good only in hero’ type roles people mainly go to watch his films only to see the glamour factor ,presence onscreen n his dancing as someone there said not to see a good film or an excellent performance ..he cannot carry on a supporting role or a small role or even a role in a film with an ensemble cast if there’s a film so Hrithik should be the SUPERHERO!! The films that you think he exelled in it n surpassed all others are made for kids(fantasy based Movies). They are so unrealistic, away from real life. Such movies are only good to entertain uneducated people they can never be a part of Classic cinema.(exept some) that does not mean that they are bad but they are not the kind of films that show the talent of an actor in his performance must say in terms of movies quality Jodha akbar was his best film. Whereas AK’s movies are all Classics. Hrithik’s are way behind than aamir’s in all aspects, be it box office collection, be it acting, be it script, be it quality.. So he scores over Hrithik here .Aamir is one of the best actors Bollywood has ever witnessed and at this time he is the best he’s n 1 in our time actors. We all have to accept this FACT, believe me I adore HRITHIK he’s one of my favourites I must say he’s good n I admired many of his films such as kaho na pyaar hai, , koi mil gaya n Jodhaa akbar but it’s not easy to say that an actor is VERSATILE just because he knows how to act as for Hrithik he is the only who will be able to comptete with Aamir in the future…not NOW! After 10years he may become the best it’s not an evidence but has potential ..and we can’t say that Hrithik is better because he has won many awards in this short time because in fact when Hrithik came there’s no Anil Kapoor, No amitabh bachchan( jst few times), No Nana Patekar, No sanjay dutt, No Jackie SHroff, No Naseer D S etc he had an only competitor: SRK and as I said Hrithik is more talented than SRK so obviously Hrithik with his acting ability, his physics, dance has overtaken SRK while Aamir came along wid all these great actors that I mentionned above so it was harder for him as a young junior to compete with all these greater actors right? and that’s why his chances were lower but when SRK came everything has changed It was hard for me to believe that he won it for Dil To Pagal Hia instead of anil’s unbelievable performance in Virsaat, how could he win it for KKHH when Aamir deserved it for Ghulam, also for DDLJ Aamir was undoubtedly better in AHAT and Rangeela . and Baazigar!!! If they’re really insisting in giving the award to SRK they should have gave it to him for Kabhi haan kabhi naa instead and the biggest shock: DEVDAS!!!! The poorest performance it was an insult to the film really and most recently My Name is khan! Get a life ppl..maybe even salman was better that year (though I don’t like him that much) Believe me I don’t live in India and I can surely tell you that all over the world people consider Aamir as the only thing that matters in Bollywood today!

  • ############3rd part#####
    Aamir defines the VERSATILITY n he’s proving it each year with each role n most recently with the super Blockbuster of all time 3 idiots …ok let’s forget about how much was the film successful n just talk about the acting as it’s our topic here( though I think the success of the film in the box office shouldn’t be a negative point for it becoz a film can be excellent n at the same time successful just like 3 idiots). do you think any other actor could be able to do the role of Rancho and if so do you think he would do it perfectly like Aamir did? And now don’t come out n say that Hrithik could have done 3 IDIOTS also because it will be an act of stupidity… aamir can actually carry on any kind of role: romance, drama, comedy, action…and do it perfectly he puts himself into his roles and disappaears completely into the skin of his character with Aamir you can completely forget that you r watching him n just feel that it’s the Character in the movie that you’re watching compare him in Sarfarosh, RDB , Dil Chahta Hai n Lagaan you will feel all are so diversed n different you’ll see a big difference in expressions that’s what great acting is all about. for an actor who can play the role of an urban super rich dude in modern India n in the same year a role a villager in Pre-Independance India when the British Raj was at it’s full glory it indeed proves his versatility n the great talent he has..the best thing is that he even knows the audiences, what they want. Not just an excellent actor but also a great director and producer…
    SRK is a SUPERSTAR not the best actor, in fact he has never been that great actor he’s an average actor n good sometimes most consider him best because of his charisma and his romantic roles. He never want to make differencehe doesn’t do different roles exept some(chakde, swades, asoka, baazigar) he’s a good business man, the reason why I am calling Shahrukh a business man is because he is more of an endorser than anything. He has a cricket team, dances at award shows, dances at weddings, makes special appearances everywhere, comes on TV…all because of what? The money.. He is witty and charming and that is one of the reasons he is supposedly the “no. 1″ star in India because he can entertain anyone with his talks..
    Well I think if we want to compare these 3 superstars of Bollywood it must be like that:
    Talent wise: Aamir-Hrithik-SRK
    Looks wise: Hrithik-Aamir-SRK
    Charm wise: SRK-Aamir-Hrithik
    Acting wise: Aamir-Hrithik-SRK
    Dancing wise: Hrithik-SRK-Aamir
    Popularity: SRK-Aamir-Hrithik
    Power: Aamir-SRK-Hrithik

Leave a Comment