Kites First Detailed Review

By Jack Rico (New York Critic)

The Bollywood film ‘Kites,’ directed by Anurag Basu, was a film unlike any I’ve seen before. It was spoken in three languages, had a diverse cast and it wasn’t from Hollywood. It was a completely original experience. It blithely leaps from romance, to musical, to action adventure, to western, referencing any number of Hollywood genres along with one of the more beautiful musical scores in recent memory. The romance, in particular, was as intense as Nicholas Sparks‘ ‘The Notebook,’ and the chemistry between the leads was off the charts. I have to say I was surprisingly entertained and am a better critic for having seen this film. 

The plotline begins in the blistering heat of the Mexican desert, where a man has been left for dead. This is “J,” (Hrithik Roshan, the biggest movie star in India), a once- carefree Vegas huckster, now a wanted man, fighting for his life. As he makes his way back home, “J” relives the past, and we learn that the one thing keeping him alive is his burning desire to reunite with Linda (Bárbara Mori, best known in America for the 2005 hit “La Mujer De Mi Hermano”), the love of his life. When “J” first meets her he is working odd jobs, the oddest of which is to marry “illegals” for money. Linda, fresh from Mexico, has barely enough cash to pay for the phony marriage but, like “J,” she has dreams of striking it rich in America. They wed and, that very night, she departs, green card in hand. Though he barely knows her, and they don’t even speak each other’s language, “J” will never forget her. The next time he sees Linda, she is engaged to Tony (Nick Brown), the son of a fabulously wealthy casino owner. As fate would have it, “J” is dating Tony’s sister. Both of them are prepared to marry for money so they can finally make their dreams come true. There are just two problems: they are still legally married and they have fallen madly in love. Choosing one another over wealth, they flee, with a vengeful Tony in hot pursuit… This romance is described in the film as a love that “knows no language,” an apt description of KITES itself, which has more international appeal than the more traditional Bollywood fare.

Bollywood films are a rare breed of cinematic products here in the States and there are legitimate reasons why films from India aren’t successful with American audiences: they are always over 2 hours (we complain when it’s 1hr 45m), they’re like musicals that involve too much dancing (we left the musicals back in the 50’s and ‘NINE’ was a flop) and for the most part, they’re not spoken in English. The closest movie we’ve had to a successful Bollywood production has been Danny Boyle’s Academy Award effort ‘Slumdog Millionaire’ and that wasn’t really ours, it was a collaboration we did with England.

Nevertheless, Kites has the potential to change the way we look at Bollywood films. Due to its Latin flavor, it has the ability to reach the largest movie going audience in America, the US Hispanic. Enter director Brett Ratner. Known for taking Asian action star Jackie Chan and crossing him over into American superstardom with his spectacularly successful “Rush Hour” series, Ratner carries a unique synergy – he’s a Hispanic of Cuban descent who understands the power of the Hispanic consumer and what it would take to attract them to the theaters. In a brilliant strategy move by Roshan Productions, Ratner was asked to rework an English language version, designed to extend the reach of the original to the largest possible audience, including the younger demographic for whom 2+ hours is a challenge. This led to “Kites: The Remix, A Brett Ratner Presentation”. Its title suggests, a true “remix,” in that it is the same film, played to a different rhythm, running a swift 90 minutes as opposed to the 130–minute original.

The remix caters to a mass audience but it begrudgingly also contains some elements from the original cut that hurt it. For my particular tastes, the acting by the secondary cast is not as strong as the leads. There are some over the top acting moments that are quite risible. We could have done without some of the excess torso bearing poses by Hrithik, but I imagine the ladies need a dose of carnal ecstasy once in a while. Despite these small imperfections, the film is very entertaining, even for audiences that don’t regularly consume Indian films.

The bulk of the entertainment comes from the extravagant, larger than life action sequences that involve 18 wheeler trucks, chases, explosions, bullet fights, crashes and jumps that stun the senses.

Actor Hrithik Roshan is extremely charismatic and possesses the handsomeness of a major movie star. His talents don’t just end there; in the only dancing sequence of the movie, he gyrated, twirled and whirled like a snake in Vegas. He needs to come to Hollywood and do movies here ASAP. Bárbara Mori, the Uruguayan actress, raised in Mexico, fit perfectly well with Roshan and her new environment. Even though her English accent is rough, it is endearing. She has a magnetic connection that has made her one of the top actresses in Spanish television in the US. We look forward to her evolution in cinema.

Despite the positives of the protagonists, to craft an affecting love story the stars need to be well-developed, evidence a degree of sexual chemistry, and their relationship needs to be allowed to unfold on screen. By falling somewhere in between – more serious than the average comedy and lighter than the typical drama – Kites feels just about right. This love story isn’t going to appeal to those who don’t appreciate romance. It is sweet and sentimental and embraces the fantasy of love all the way through its operatic finale.

Kites recalls such master movie mixologists as Sergio Leone, Quentin Tarantino, and Baz Luhrmann. Producer Rakesh Roshan and director Anurag Basu, have made Kites into an intoxicating cinematic cocktail with a flavor—and a kick—all its own.

Rating: ★★★½☆

Advertisements

121 Comments

  • another movie which i think to mention is nayak of anil but it was spoiled by those sillly action sequences i think that if this movie was edited well and cut down it would gety oscar for best foreign film doesnt it

  • Yousif: I didn’t say that Pay it Forward is anything similar to American Beauty.. what I said is the movie was a successful one but it didn’t attract me or sticked in my mind, don’t know why! it was a depressing one.. I hate depressing movies because u leave the theatre and feel bad, depressing is different than some true or sad stories.. it’s all the direction I assume ( Baghban is one of the touching stories, makes u weep, even the movie Everybody’s Fine for Robert Dhinero, but found them good and enjoyed watching them, in addition many many other movies but can’t remember them now). anyways.. I’m not interested to see Pay it Forward again.. I loved Kevin Spacey’s movie: The Life of David Gale.. you must watch it if u didn’t.. it needs concentration too to understand it, Kate Winslet in a very good role in this movie.

  • depressing or not it doesnt matter i watched it 3 times i see no depressing thing in it if you mean by the word depressing sad so my name also is depreesing i care for the message baghban also is depreessing make u cry barrels my name name make cry oceans but they are messsageful

  • hi fathiy wait wait isnt david gale the one in which people are judged life punishment and put to elec chair i watched already its good and depressing too but it as spoiled by that black who makes insect come out of his mouth its rediculous however the movie is likeable

  • Critical reception of david gale
    Reviews were generally negative. On Rotten Tomatoes, the movie had a 20% rating based on 152 reviews. On Metacritic, the movie had a score of 31 (Generally negative reviews) out of 100.[1]

    Chicago Sun-Times movie critic Roger Ebert gave it zero stars, his lowest rating, and stated, “I am sure the filmmakers believe their film is against the death penalty. I believe it supports it and hopes to discredit the opponents of the penalty as unprincipled fraudsters….” Wrote Ebert, “Spacey and Parker are honorable men….The last shot made me want to throw something at the screen—maybe Spacey and Parker.”[2]

  • why does any religion need to be defended??? when people are killing [ep[le in the name of religion..!!! why are we bothered if a 2/3 mentally retarded embarks on a mission which can be done through proper officesof consulate.. and would president be impressed if rizwan were to meet him sans the story he created??? would any american be bothered if rizwan khan were to say he was not a terrorist but yes his kin were certainly seen plotting and gathering people ..!!!! on one hand u show muslims plotting in the film and to rectify all that rizwan khan says ..only bad people are bad ..good are good ..but doesnt he see that good people are also turning bad..under he influence of those vicious people and they are also from his community .. to say all muslims are not bad is akin to saying all christians are not bad yet many of them have been serial killers ..

    thats the point entirely missed .people just wanted to see srk as he was coming after billu after along time and the movie had been hyped ..otherwise why do u need to make a film to justify whao are good muslims and who are bad?? this idea itself is flawed ..
    i need to highlight only fate of kite here and why it failed in overseas market .. why did it not touch people …?? anythoughts on this??? bad music// bad story??/

  • hi megha i think that you are terribly distaant from political life that s y you didnt understand the importance of this movie
    read this carefully
    while we the arab muslim people who went to the USA choose to educate themselves lerning science medicine etc the zionist jews chooose to learn media/hollywoood and they became journalists so the influenced the spectators by showing that palestinian as terrorist and showing themselves as state helpless to the us people through media look at their daily news toward muslims and you will see my point SO They used hollywood movies to fight muslim and islam by deforming it
    when my name is khan came out ajewish zionist critic demanded from usa to ban the film saying that its discrimnatory while its otherwise then people attacked hershe withdrew her comments
    yes it s the duty of every religious man or woman to defend his religion if its true and that is the case with shahrukh khan our prophet mohammad salla alahu alaihi wa sallam says(by whom my soul within his hand (i swear) no christian jewish or majus(persian (indian) doesnt hear of me and doesnt believe in what i brought (message) he wont enter the paradise and hence dwell in eternal hell) so here its evident that the islam is the religion of GOD: allah
    hence its legitimate to show the truth of it to the world and refute the zionnist feignings

  • megha rizwan khan not retarded but autist i said before that you didnt undersand whats autism and asperger the team of the film were intilligent when they made shahrukh riz khan autist so that people see that the story is acceptable because such truehearted man is rare nowadys he ll be thought of as prophet hence people will reject the whole story
    by choosing an autist who usually repeat themslves restrictedly i ecommend that younshould read on tyhis topic autism and asperger karan johar avoided falling in that trap so that no critic would criticise the hero of the story
    nothing will hapen if youn sue the state t hrou embassy or whatever
    look megha when we say that therea are tow types of people good or bad hence any person will be equal to some onelse religion hence islam islike judaism not terrorist like also christianity so they are equal but the judaism and christianity were miinterpreted to suiot the wants of priests rabbai desires
    hence allah ruled these toreligion and substituted them with islam stay tuned megha

  • megha listen
    due to fanaticism between muslims and christian and jewish people no on other e woold hear the other but through cinema this can be than smoothly

  • no you are wrong deary the idea is flawless
    because at the end the man is either bad or good no matter what his reliigin is be it christian jewish hindu or muslim but being bad cannot be alluded to religion for example the us kills one million iraki babies in the nineties and another million after the ongoing war of 2003 BUT WE THE MUSLIM DONT CALL CHRISTIAN TERRORIST BECAUSE WE KNOW THAT CHRIST DONT TOLERATE SUCH THING IT S THEIR BAD EGO WHICH DRIVES THEM TO KILL INNNOCENT LIKE WISE THE ZIONIST ISRAELI KILLS PALITINIAN LEBANESE POEPLE JORDANIAN ETC BUT WE DONT CALL THE JUDAISM A RELIGION OF TERROR BECAUSE INHERENTLY KNOW THAT MOSES DOESNT ALLOW SUCH TO HAPPEN CONTRARY TO US THEY WENT ON TO CALL OUR RELIGION BY TERROR CHEEKILY HOW DARE THEY?
    YOU SEE THE POINT

  • I HOPE THAT THIS WILL MAKE YOU UNDERSTAND WHY THIS MOVIE IS IMPORTANT NOT TO US BUT TO YOU ALL
    CONCERNING KITES I SAID BEFORE THAT THE STORY LINEIS IMILAR TO ANTONIO BANDERAS DESPERADO SO ITS NOT NEW ORTIGINAL THAT S WHY IT BOMBED OUTSIDE
    INSIDE INDIA IT S BECAUSE OF ALL ENGLISH SPANISH LANGUAGES LITTE HINDI
    ALSO THE PAIRING OF HRITHIK AND MORI IS FATED TO BE REJECTED COZ NO OUTSIDER MAKES IT TOP IN BOLLYWOOD

  • MEGHA
    I HOPE THAT THIS WILL MAKE YOU UNDERSTAND WHY THIS MOVIE IS IMPORTANT NOT TO US BUT TO YOU ALL
    CONCERNING KITES I SAID BEFORE THAT THE STORY LINEIS IMILAR TO ANTONIO BANDERAS DESPERADO SO ITS NOT NEW ORTIGINAL THAT S WHY IT BOMBED OUTSIDE
    INSIDE INDIA IT S BECAUSE OF ALL ENGLISH SPANISH LANGUAGES LITTE HINDI
    ALSO THE PAIRING OF HRITHIK AND MORI IS FATED TO BE REJECTED COZ NO OUTSIDER MAKES IT TOP IN BOLLYWOOD

  • i guess your views over a mere film are too political and religious for me to get dragged into it .. mnik didnt work in india cos it was nonentertaining ..just that.. it could have smashed all records had it not strayed in the path you just justified .. we do not want any certifiacte of sanity of muslims by karan johar.. a man is known by its deeds.. making rizwan khan autistic doesnt mean that his cortical skills are fully intact..!! there is a a level of i.q which they lack. that made him easier to make him do what he wanted to.. and the act of enacting aspergers was too simple nodding of head and keeping a monotone… the story line was far from believable.yes you are not a terrorist ..merely a plotter???

    and ah kites ..i had already fated before its release that it will not do well .. we must dissect and bisect all films only then we will come to know its true worth..!!!

  • Yousif: yes.. it’s about the death penality, Kevin Spacey on a death raw..but can’t remember this scene which u hv mentioned! insect coming out from someone’s mouth!! didn’t see this in the movie!!
    I don’t care about any reviews.. I watch a movie and would speak my opinion to everyone, and don’t care about other’s point of view.. why should I care?!! they’re also humen, got eyes, ears, brains like we do.. they watch any movie and may find it good, bad, depressing, interesting, great, crap, exactly like we do.. so we all hv different opinions and the right to express our opinions about any movie we watch.. if I didn’t find The Life of David Gale as a good movie then why should I say something opposite!! Whether the rating was 5/5 for the reviewers or it was 0/5.. for me it was a good movie, was shocked watching the last scene, and enjoyed it.
    People praised the movie Eagle Eyes, and went to see it when it released in cinema.. it was a stupid idea and gave me a headache!! and hahahahahaha.. at the end.. u discover that the one who threatened them, led them, controlled them was just a… computer!!! the computer itself is the one who’s controlling everything and no one is controlling the computer so stupid.. and this movie was a super hit I assume!!!!

  • non entertaining or not who cares i care for good story theme message good envisaging thats alll megha
    my name is very intelligent and its i q is very high whereas three idiot is absolute zero iq such stupid movies dont work with an intellectual person like me
    listen megha you were crying that mnik lacks message but when i showed it to you syou say that its nonentertainng we know already that the film is serious
    you said that srk envisaging of an autist simple but why do you ignore the scene of the church why study this scene carefullly and dont be bias look for the documentary of stephen humshire the autist painter and look to his facial expression you will be surprised that srk has execlled where dustin and hanks rushed in also watch kim peek docs to know the truth of impersonating
    posing baseless arguments is nothing but mutterings
    you said that the story isunbelievable you will be astonished that this story isbased on three stories cobined
    one of the couple from the book asperger in love
    second shahrukh detention and make late in heathrow airport newjrsy accident
    the tghird of abdarrahman zeitoun the american syrian whose story was written by dave daggers novel called zeitoun who helped peope in georgia face the hurricane but they made him a terrorist
    you can check yourself its very believable to endless extant

  • @ fathyia
    i didnt mean by showing the reviews to say that the movie is bad but i wanted to tell that some critic are bias or dont know their job properly the movie definitely is very touching and topic based though provocative but the scene of the black emitting insects out of his mouth made it look silly they should delete that portions because they are meaningless above all the film is good by the way can you write down your email please

  • one of the causes of kites flopping is the scene of robbery
    where on earth have you seen robbbers stealing heisting with their faces bare!? also flying long meters to reach the other roofs the dialogues dilevery is not well delivered as if it were recitation

  • No Yousef.. not those scenes, but the movie in general wasn’t something extra-ordinary, as we all expected it to be! Hrithik is a super star with lots of powers as a hero in bollywood movies, while comparing this movie with his old ones, Krrish, Koi Mel Gaya, Jodha Akbar, Kahna Pyaar Hai, Fiza, Mission Kashmir, etc.. everyone found Kites is just a pass time movie, that’s all, even Mujhse Dosti Karogi which didn’t do well in India ( but did a good business overseas) was a much better movie, much more interesting.. the only good thing in Kites was Barbara Mori, to see her in this movie.

  • And you said about the life of david gale a black comedy!!!!! you’re wrong yousif.. I think u saw another movie!! it’s a serious issue, no comedy scenes in this movie at all!!!

  • you re right fathyia i think that i mixed it with another hwood movie called the green mile of tom hanks which as good as david gale except that scenes of the black and insect portion go watch it and you will see yourself that its a black com

  • The Green Mile is a 1999 American drama film directed by Frank Darabont and adapted by him from the 1996 Stephen King novel of the same name. The movie is told in a flashback format and stars Tom Hanks as Paul Edgecomb and Michael Clarke Duncan as John Coffey and tells the story of Paul and his life as a corrections officer on Death Row during the Great Depression
    The film was nominated for four Academy Awards: Best Supporting Actor, Best Picture, Best Sound, and Best Adapted Screenplay.

  • Yousif: I saw the green mile, loved it, and yeah.. now I remembered that scene.. it was from this movie

Leave a Comment