Case filed against Salman for hurting Muslim Community sentiment

A case was filed against Salman Khan for allegedly hurting the religious sentiments of the Mumbai community.

The superstar was booked under IPC Section 295A (deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs) on the basis of a complaint lodged by one Mohammad Asim Mohammad Arif, a Mumbai city resident, police told reporters late on Thursday night.

The complaint states that Salman’s Being Human had organised a fashion show in Mumbai where a model walked down the ramp wearing a T-shirt on which a word was inscribed in Arabic. This hurt the religious sentiment of Muslim community, Arif claimed.

“We are investigating the case. The complainant has provided a video clipping of the fashion show,” a police official said.

Salman Khan

Salman Khan

Advertisements

90 Comments

  • From the famous saying of Navin
    “As You Sow So Shall You Reap”

    If Lawyer had done mistake he will gets his due
    Other wise the Fashion Designer should get Punished

    Not our ApeJaan where the famous Organisation PETA will get full support for him
    @Anand not our Srk will do anything because this time PETA should gets correct
    report as if they will support you Apes because Apeman should not get punished
    and also its clear that some one wants some limelight to get attention from public
    but anand dont worry indians wont punish animals they punish only humans

  • Well, I request all not to turn this section into a place of unnecessary hatred or controversies. The topic is sensitive. Well, I just pray the issue is sorted out as soon as possible. But I feel that he should have filed against a wrong person, Salman Khan. It should have been the designer, not even the model.

    @Kushee Bangladeshi,
    As far as I am concerned, the political systems of Bangladesh and India are almost the same. In Bangladesh, majority are Muslims and so are their political parties: AL, BNP, JI, BJP (Bangladesh Jatiya Party). They might among one another for the seats. So, they need the minority’s supports. Minorities enjoy rights.
    In India, Hindus are majority and so are their major parties like Congress, BJP and others. So, they fight among themselves for the seats. Thus, they need minorities’ supports. Minorities enjoy rights.
    So, it doesn’t mean that Bangladeshi Hindus are smarter than Indian Hindus. Similarly, it doesn’t mean that Indian Muslims are better than the Bangladeshi Muslims.
    We, the people of Indian descends, where we go, whatsoever religion we follow (Hinduism, Sikhism, Islam or Christianity) have the similar trend of handling things.

    @Arjan, I request you to tone down a bit. I hope you won’t mind. We can just nothing talking about the history. If we just think back about the brutal situation during the independence (and seceding of Pakistan from India), we feel like doing something brutal in revenge. Well, bygones are bygones. A major culprit behind the unending disputes today has left India. Let the India prosper!! Jai Hind!!
    Thank you!

  • @Dynamic Shivers, I have not understood a word of yours. Perhaps because I am still a student of English. So, could you kindly write to me in short and simple sentences?? Thank you!!

  • Sorry……….But I feel that he should NOT have filed against a wrong person, Salman Khan. It should have been the designer, not even the model. …………………

  • @dynamic shivers

    Just for you heres my famous saying said properly n not by a retard like you which incidentally is tailor made for you:- “you reap what you sow”

    Broken down it means you have for example been apeing nipun, arjun kapoor n now me here on Indicine for months bcoz quite frankly as plain old ‘dynamic’ you were a nobody- a douche bag whose status was sewer level… You started to ape other users but that only led to you becoming mentally challenged or as I like to say ‘retarded’ hence as irony would have it you have now become an ApeTard…!

    Comprehend that my humshakal wannabe friend…

  • @Arjan STFU you dumbfkk..Remember that it’s a Hindu PM AB Vajpayee who uplifted this country post 1996 and now another Hindu Narendra Modi will definitely bring in more prosperity in this country..

    and who the hell are you to call Hindus a fool..remember one thing that foreigners come to visit Hindu temples when they come to India.. so have control on your tongue before blabbering crap..

    @Loki ki Jockey.. pls ask our King to build real abs than using VFX!!! :P

  • @heropanti
    Everybody knows.
    Only some blind followers like you tend to disagree….
    But one day he will be proven guilty for sure and then we will talk.

  • I sometimes feels all the good work , charity he is doing through his NGO being human is for the day when he will be found guilty by the court.
    And then his lawyers will plead for mercy from the court on the pretext of all the good work salman and his NGO is doing. They will request the court to minimise the punishment as if salman is jailed then so many good and social works going under his NGO will hit a roadblock.

  • this is height of stupidity… casing file for doning a dress with some `religious’ text… pathetic…. the most pathetic thing ever to come on earth beside humans is religion.. it divides so many people…

  • @Arjan,sometimes I feel bad being Muslim….obviously Not because I believe in Allah but you guys without understanding believe in wrong guy who claimed them Muslims and hold Islam for their wrong deeds….islam is peace…..to give any opinion at least think twice…. Muslims enjoy their rights in India not because they are Muslim but because of they are citizens like you….same way said by khushi….she enjoys her rights on Bangladesh though that is Muslim country…

  • @ tiger first u understand that i m not against muslim cuz my top 2 actors Salman, aamir are muslim. when did i said whole muslim i talked about those muslim commeties who thinks they have power to give direction to all muslims u can search they release fatwa against salman during jai ho time so i note that time many muslim talked against salman that time thats y jai ho failed to do very good business otherwise jai ho was capable to do 150 crore easily. it was old issue so kick didnt get harm. but Salman got some permanent haters sure for that incident. 30 crore on eid is less i think kick deserve 33 crore on eid day if i consider it was fifth day of kick.

  • as a salman fan I believe he is little unlucky because of india media and his court cases history. people take the advantage of cases history and manipulative public by adding his name to almost anything bad going on in india. first it was narindra modi issues during jai ho and than saifai issue and people blamed salman but dhoom 3 was in theatres running full houses and nobody had problem with it. during kick release there was photographer issue and now this case filed which makes no sense. now a days people can do anything for publicity. all these negative people will not succeed. it reminds me the time of 2007 and 2008 when salman was struggling because of this type of negativity spread by the media but look he came back strong and now no. 1 star in india since 2010. hrithik is another guy who is in same situation right now what salman was facing in 2007 and 2008 and every now and then I see a negativity being spread about hrithk by media. people make fun of salman calling himself being human but I want ask these people that salman may be faking just like these people say but atleast he is spending his hard earned money for right cause which non of these criticizers do

  • @kushee, when you are minority (Any relgiion, any sect, caste etc., ) you tend to cling and be overprotective. Then anything and everything releated to your following say, religion, caste, whatever, becomes a concern for you and the groups involved, so you always try to raise a voice as you feel that others are trying to intrude or harm in some way viz your feelings, following, practice etc.,

    Its just a sense of insecurity, and it happens to majority of the population, irrespective of their relgion, caste or country.

    We see this happen in our city mumbai with people coming from small towns, where they generally are somewhat detached with the city folks and tend to cling to each other with similar following, like people from same State, same religion, same village etc., making association and other things.

    it has its benefits, but makes you have a very skewed vision of anything and everything outside your purview or interest.

  • when will this man go to jail?
    @salman fans, its prohibited in islam to write allah on a t-shirt and what really made it awful was were the occasion its been worn, dats nonsense(Fashion show)

  • its totally different, salman is a criminal, no wonder he hasnt married yet, 48 and still single, hes nt a true muslim then, am nt surprise whilst srk on d other hand is respected evrywhere, good husband, great achievement he has made fr himself, knwn evrywhere, frm nigeria to morocco, am n african, and many african countries loved only diz man in bollywood and amitabh also, nt that fat bulky criminal

  • This guy is an embarrassment to India… He is nothing without eid – jai ho… Copies south movies and is shame to acting he is just as flop as his brothers only if his brothers start to release their movies on eid

  • Am not surprised, being human is established to clear his criminal act,some blind indian fan of his doesnt knw dz, he wants them to knw hes changed attitude buh he hasnt and am so very sure hes aware of dz incident when d name z been written on dat tshirt coz dey wil fr sure be updating him on ow d wrongful act is going

  • Wel um a die hrd srk fan.. bt serisly this is nt gud news. Choti choti baat pe these guys file a case.. i do want salman to get punishment for HND case bt not for this.
    Apreciated aswel that salman praised srkz abs.
    Rip haters.

  • @arjun shut your mouth.
    come to Maharashtra and specially come to Mumbai and Pune.
    you will see what is power of Hindu community.
    I think u don’t know balasaheb thakrey and raj thakrey.
    shame on you arjun.

  • @Laila & JC we Hindus in Bangladesh are always neglected in every sections. When we see The Muslims Christians Buddhists specialy Muslims are honored in India we expecte same from our motherland. Mera pisla comment ka matlab yeh nahi tha hum Hindus Bangladesh mein bohut happy hain. We r mentally harassed because we r Hindus. I love India.

  • This is for the people that hail SRK a perfect saint and king and hence, worship him. We love Salman because we feel he’s our bhai, we don’t worship him. We know he is imperfect like us.

    While Indian Media do not leave out a single opportunity to report any case filed against/around Salman Khan or the alleged criminal charges he has been going through, they hesitate to do the same when it comes to the criminal cases surrounding SRK. Call it the acts of his PR networks among media or any other.

    Salman has been facing criminal prosecutions with respect to the alleged crimes. All prosecutions against him are going to be justified IF he has in fact committed the crimes. If we respect the law or are not the witnesses to the alleged crimes, we should let the court handle them. Else, the blatant statements by some people will be like they are trying to be above the law and influencing the judicial proceedings and the court.

    On the other hand, SRK has also committed crimes in public. But SRK facing no criminal charges is criminal prsection is strikingly shocking. What can one call it, being a filthy rich person or politically-well-connected? Some people say the ban against him to Wankedhe Stadium balances out his crimes at the stadium. The ban against SRK to Wankedhe Stadium is just a precautionary step to prevent him from creating further havocs at the stadium and giving the public the required security and peace. Hence, it is a penalty, by no means punishments on SRK for his crimes in public.

    Below mentioned are some criminal cases against/around SRK that has been against SRK but only a handful of media organizations reported:

    1- Based on the complaint of Lok Janshakti Party national secretary Ravi Brahme that Shah Rukh, 46, allegedly insulted the tricolour in a video uploaded on Youtube, the Chatushringi police lodged an FIR against the actor on August 14 2012.
    “Shah Rukh Khan has been booked under sections of Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971. The case was registered on August 14 and has been transferred to Mumbai police for further investigation. The case documents consist some photos and videos too,” a police officer said.

    2- An activist Indrajeet Singh Bhatia filed against SRK for his unmannerly behavior under section 200 of CrPc (examination of complainant) in the court of Judicial Magistrate (First Class) Sangeeta Tiwari.
    Earlier on May 17, the Mumbai Police filed a non-cognisable crime against SRK and three others in the Wankhede drunken scuffle case.
    Complainant Bhatia asked court to charge actor under sections 294 (obscene acts and songs), 323 (punishment for voluntarily causing hurt), 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty) and 499 (defamation) of the Indian Penal Code. Bhatia once again moved an application saying that SRK is of course ‘not above the law’. The application was filed in the same court under section 156 of IPC to enable him to lodge an FIR against Shahrukh.

    3- Shah Rukh Khan’s Driver was arrested and charged under IPC sections 376 for rape and 506 (2) for criminal intimidation for raping a 23-year-old girl he 23-year-old in a hotel at Nalasopara on January 20, 2014.
    The Bandra police has filed a case against Shahrukh Khan on 18th June 2009 for hurting the religious sentiments of the Muslims under section 295-a (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religion feelings or any class by insulting its religion beliefs) and 34 (acts done by several persons with common interest) of IPC.

    4- Mumbai: Social activist, Nicholas Almeida, has filed a criminal complaint at a local court in Bandra against superstar Shah Rukh Khan and municipal commissioner Sitaram Kunte, alleging construction of a ramp adjoining King Khan’s Mannat is illegal. The complaint, which is filed under Sections 268 and 290 of the Indian Penal Code, alleges that SRK did not take approval of the concerned authorities before constructing the ramp. Nicholas also added in his complaint that the illegal ramp is constructed on a important access road. It is causing great inconvenience to the people during the Bandra Fair, which is held every year in the month of September.

    To put it fair and square, for the havocs he created at the stadium and Bodily Hurt on Shirish Kunder combined, SRK should be prosecuted under the following criminal charges on the top of the charges he has already been booked so far.

    1) IPC Section 351- Assault (Punishments: three months, or with fine which may extend to five hundred or with both)
    3) IPC Section 355- Assault or criminal force with intent to dishonor person, otherwise than on grave provocation (Punishments: two years, or with fine, or with both. )
    4) IPC Section 290. Public Nuisance (Punishments: fine which may extend to two hundred rupees.)
    5) IPC Section 291. Continuance of nuisance after injunction to discontinue (Punishments:imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both.)
    6) IPC Section 321. Voluntarily causing hurt. (Punishments: one year, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both)
    7) IPC Section 332. Voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty (Punishments:three years, or with fine, or with both.)
    8) IPC Section 503- Criminal Intimidation (Likely happened against Shrish Kunder. SRK attacked Shirish Kunder from behind at a party and left the place subsequently. Later, Shirish challenged SRK for an One-on-One fight. Few days afterwards, Shirish had to unwillingly patch up with SRK because of the pressures from SRK lobby groups. So, he along with Sajid Khan and Sajid Nadiawala went to SRK’s house. This act desists Shirish from taking legal help and criminal prosections against SRK. Hence, this act amounts to Criminal Inmidation. *This is a possibility, not an established fact.)

    Now, just imagine how SRK was able to escape all these criminal charges despite the availability of ample photo-audio-video evidences against him. SRK’s crimes are proven and witnessed by hundreds of people at the stadium. If Indian ruling system is fair and good enough, not only Salman but also SRK has to face criminal charges. Why double standard! Now, the fans of the skeleton king, think twice before you blabber!

    Admission: There was a comment by a certain user on Indicine early this year. I have copied his statement and saved it. And now, I have combined it with my own.

  • @yuvraj, u wrote “muslim community is against Salman”. The sentence clearly shows u think all muslim of india against Salman. If u r a true Salman fan then u must giv up these communial sentiments bcoz Salman respect all religion.

  • @vikram, if salman is nothing without eid then ur king is nothing even with dewali, christmass. Remember his disaster unofficial many hollywood movies’ remake ra one, semi p….. Jthj, don2.

  • @LAILA you feeling bad about being a muslim shows that your not even a good muslim and you dont believe in it, shame to you, your just a disgrace to islam and pls dont use that name LAILAH, coz i knw u dnt know wat it meant

  • @vikram, jai ho was a non holyday release still collected 113cr nd declared as semi hit boy trade pundits. But ur king’s last non holyday release yljk collected only 40lakh net nd declared the biggest disaster of indian cinema.

  • i want salman fans to pls reply to this
    why hasnt he marry? oh maybe hes waiting for that moment he’d shock indians that hes gay like wentworth miller(prison break starrer) did.

Leave a Comment