Aligarh Reviews

Aligarh releases in theatres tomorrow, but a few reviews of the film are out already. Check out some reviews.

[mks_button size=”medium” title=”Average Rating of All ‘Aligarh’ Review – 3.6 stars” style=”rounded” bg_color=”#1e73be” txt_color=”#FFFFFF” icon=”” icon_type=””]

Aligarh Review by Bollywood Hungama

Rating: ★★★½☆

ALIGARH boasts of a wonderful and heartfelt screenplay Apurva Asrani (who has also written the story). One has to give it to him for handling an extremely sensitive topic in the most sensible manner. The film sees the no holds barred directorial prowess of Hansal Mehta, who has handled the film in an extremely skilful manner. Thanks to his direction, the film gets translated into a mixed bag of emotions such as fearless, captivating, moving and heart-breaking one. While the film has an extremely engaging first half, the second half sees the film losing its grip mainly due to its slow pace and starts looking disjointed. Many things remain unexplained which may confuse the audience.

Aligarh Review by Tushar P Joshi on Bollywood Life

Rating: ★★★★☆

Aligarh is more than just a film about gay rights. It documents the human spirit, and the freedom it struggles to sustain despite its oppressive surroundings. Aligarh is a story of hope and innocence in a time when prejudice and judgement substitutes compassion and kindness. Yes, it is also a story of gay rights, but more so it is a tale of human rights. Mehta has used Siras as a metaphor to highlight optimism in a time of a pessimistic environment. There are moments in the film where you feel more than just empathy and compassion for Siras.

Aligarh Review by Sonia Chopra on Sify

Rating: ★★★½☆

Mehta’s sure-footed storytelling is enhanced by the technical finesse, from the cinematography and editing, to the production design and music. Watch the film to experience a story that is as searing as it is sensitive. Most crucially, the film ensures that the absurdity of a law criminalizing homosexuality hits home harder than ever.

Aligarh Review by Jaidev Hemmady on Movietalkies

Rating: ★★★½☆

Hansal Mehta had delivered a winner with his last film Shahid and Aligarh too deserves a standing ovation. Mehta has taken the story of Siras and made it about human rights and not just about homosexuality, for which, he should be lauded. Moreover, Mehta has done it without getting preachy, which is another feather that he should add to his hat. Aligarh is a true ‘David versus Goliath’ story and has been treated with utmost sincerity and sensitivity. However, this is not to say that the film doesn’t have its faults. The plot moves at a slow pace and the courtroom scenes when Siras challenges the decision of the University to suspend him, are bereft of any intensity or drama (Not that we were expecting some tareekh pe tareekh histrionics, but the court scenes could have been more gripping). Nevertheless, Aligarh is definitely worth a watch for the powerful performances and the sincere treatment of a sensitive story.

Aligarh Review by Sweta Kaushal on Hindustan Times

Rating: ★★★★½

Unlike Bollywood’s stereotype of the loud, floral-loving homosexual, Aligarh champions a very sensitive side of the country’s third gender. Mehta’s unusual hero takes special efforts to emphasise the fact that everyone is entitled to their sexual preference and should enjoy the freedom to love. He defies labels and often tells Deepu that we should stop trying to categorise everything and everyone.

Review by Saibal Chatterjee on NDTVMovies

Rating: ★★★★½

Aligarh is equal parts a powerful character study, an incisive social commentary, a tragedy of harrowing proportions and a cautionary parable about a society rife with contradictions. The story, an introductory disclaimer asserts, is inspired by real events modified on the basis of related media reports and legal proceedings.

Review by Shubha Shetty-Saha on Mid-Day India

Rating: ★★★½☆

Mehta, who earlier gave us the gritty Shahid (2012), is evidently at his best when he brings true stories to life and, in his own way, fights against the injustice meted out to the protagonists. Thankfully, Mehta, for most part, doesn’t get carried away by the emotions attached to such a subject, and presents it as starkly as he can. The only time the script (by Asrani) and the director falter is in a scene where they try to gain respect for the poetic professor’s sexual encounter by calling it ‘love’. As if these men who are rooting for sexual freedom are still not ready to accept sex as just a necessity and not necessarily an act attached to the feelings of the heart. The meandering, slow pace largely works for the film, but sometimes works against it.

Aligarh Review by Indiaglitz

Rating: ★★★★☆

The movie is bit slow in its narration and drags in the second half. Many scenes could have been trimmed down as they were perfect for the film festivals but not for the ordinary audience. There are few unconvincing scenes which dilutes the impact of the film, especially in its finale. Also, the movie tends to be bit preachy and repetitive in the second half making it look bit boring at times.

Review by Renuka Vyavahare on The Times Of India

Rating: ★★★★☆

Some films cease to be a story or a mere depiction of an incident or an issue. You live them. They mirror the society’s mindset and in doing so, rake out your own prejudices. Aligarh is one such biographical drama that tugs at your heartstrings.

Review by Manisha Lakhe on Nowrunning

Rating: ★★★½☆

Rajkummar Rao is really good as a gentle but persistent journalist who thinks Professor Siras’s story is more human interest than just a scandal. Ashish Vidyarthi as the lawyer who defends the professor does a wonderful job as well. But there’s only a shrieky woman lawyer and four silent professors who are the all-powerful enemy, and they are weakest link of the movie. Their outraged morality logic does not come across as menacing at all. The fact that they manipulated the system, that they paid the tv crew to do the ‘dirty’, does not come across, rendering the enemy weak. But every flaw goes unnoticed because of Manoj Bajpayee’s superlative performance. He makes you smile, feel elated, lost, alone, and sad and you bring it all back home… hoping some of the ancient laws will change some day soon.

Review by IANS on Zeenews

Rating: ★★★½☆

Mounted with moderate production values, Satya Rai Nagpaul’s camera work is steady and remarkable. His frames are realistic. With his wide angle lenses and tight close-ups, he artistically captures the claustrophobic space and the fine nuances of Manoj’s haunting performance. Karan Kulkarni’s soulful background score is well-layered in the narration. There are a few edit jerks in Apurva Asrani’s editing but this could probably be due to censor issues. Overall, Hansal Mehta’s direction touches a raw nerve and makes you embrace the film wholeheartedly.

Review by Shubhra Gupta on Indian Express

Rating: ★★★½☆

And it carries ‘Aligarh’, especially when Manoj Bajpayee transcends himself, and gives us a man trying to deal with pain and humiliation with dignity. Rao’s youthful ebullience is an effective counter, his Malayalam- inflected Hindi just right. It is a pleasure to see these actors interact. The newsroom doesn’t feel as real as it should, though (for that, please watch ‘Spotlight’, which gets it spot-on): those portions are off-key. I also missed seeing Siras’s relationship with his students : or, seeing the perfunctory nature of the department of Marathi that Siras heads at the Aligarh Muslim University (everyone in the film carefully leaves out the ‘Muslim’ whenever the name comes up), did he have any to speak of? Did he leave his native Maharashtra to seek refuge in Aligarh? But the film itself is bigger than these things. Like in his ‘Shahid’, Hansal Mehta and scriptwriter Apurva Asrani have come up with a lead character and a film which shines with authenticity and emotional heft, which leaves you thinking, and which says something we should all listen to, especially in these times when it has become more imperative than ever before: we can be different, but we are us.

Review by Kunal Guha on Mumbai Mirror

Rating: ★★★★☆

It’s safe to say, this is one of Manoj Bajpayee’s most challenging roles. Managing a character that has been largely caricatured in Hindi films, he interprets his as one who is restrained and grieves privately. Rajkummar Rao is amiable as an enthusiastic journalist who hopes to establish an unbiased voice in his reportage. Many feel this film stands for gay rights or makes an argument for repealing Section 377 or is a testament of those who endure atrocities on account of their sexual orientation. It is all that but largely, it is a film that documents one man’s struggle to survive, be accepted and find a space for himself in a judgmental non-inclusive society. How one experiences this film mirrors one’s opinions and preconceived notions of alternative sexualities. It’s a film of many firsts. And given how most Hindi movies caricature homosexuals, this one is a reality check.

Review by Martin D’Souza on Glamsham

Rating: ★★★☆☆

After his Successful SHAHID, Mehta works his way through another biopic, and although he gets his subject right, not all of his surroundings get things going. It is only the brilliance of Bajpayee that negates all such short-comings. Rajkumar Rao’s character as a reporter from Indian Post is not well-defined; nor is his role in his organization. He is shown as the ‘ticker man’ when it is now a redundant post, done away with ever since computers and the internet invaded our lives. Tickers or news inputs from different agencies (PTI, UNI, AFP, Reuters) would be handled by a clerk who would give the respective copies to the various departments (Sports, Politics, Business, Crime…). Just like proof readers are done away with, so are the ‘ticker guys’.

Review by Sarita A Tanwar on DNA India

Rating: ★★★★☆

The best part of the film is its utter commitment to Siras’ story. We watched silently while an innocent man was victimised just because he was different from us, that’s just one more reason to watch this film.

Review by Suhani Singh on India Today

Rating: ★★★☆☆

What makes Aligarh a must-watch is that in Siras audiences are treated to a character who breaks all the Bollywood stereotypes of being gay. He isn’t the lecherous sort dressed in garish outfits, but a dignified, educated man. He is a recluse who is brought alive beautifully by Bajpayee. Siras is a far cry from the colourful characters that made Bajpayee a household name. Bajpayee’s soft delivery, his silences, his eyes, his measured movements deftly convey the character’s pathos, his yearning for solitude, his mounting troubles and fears. It’s that rare, restrained performance that Bajpayee will be remembered for.

Review by Mehul S Thakkar on Deccan Chronicle

Rating: ★★☆☆☆

Rajkummar Rao who plays the role of a journalist (Deepu) is mediocre and is same like he has been in his earlier films. He had so much scope to shine but it is an opportunity wasted. Cinematography Satya Ray Nagpaul is commendable bringing out the real essence of the life of the professor the way he has shot it. Sound design by Mandar Kulkarni works keeping in mind the mood of the film. Manoj Bajpayee proves again that he can mould himself into any character and entertain the audience.

Review by Sukanya Verma on Rediff

Rating: ★★★½☆

Mehta shoots Aligarh’s nights in hues of honey-yellow even as days are filled with scenes of dusty streets, dilapidated flax yellow walls and kitschy upholstery that finds a lot of love in small-town abodes. The pace is unhurried, the background score is minimal, and Aligarh’s mood is often dry or distant. And that’s why the fleeting comedy around Rao’s landlady appears like scenes from another movie. In Hindi cinema, where homosexuality is an object of derisive gags or caricature, the portrayal Aligarh offers is refreshing and respectful. But it’s much too multifaceted, at times for its own good, to be acknowledged for just that.

Review by Rajeev Masand on IBNLive

Rating: ★★★½☆

Aligarh is an important film, and it’s powered by sensitive writing, nuanced direction, and masterful performances from its central players. The image of Siras, a grown man blushing when he’s described as handsome, or when a gathering of gay men hail his poetry, stays with you long after you’ve watched the film. Its deliberate pace occasionally makes you restless, and you long to know more about Siras than the plot lets you in on. What kind of professor was he? Did he have any friends? How did his ‘shaming’ impact his family in Nagpur? Crucially though, the tragic climax never pierces you in the manner that it ought to. The emotional wallop is missing. Mehta eschews melodrama throughout the film, but in blunting this key moment in Siras’ story, the filmmakers deny the viewer a chance to bring one’s feelings to a boil. Sometimes a good cry is a way of saying I care.

Review by Meeta on Wogma

Rating: ★★★½☆

Rajkummar Rao does brilliantly to bring this through too. His performance is almost taken for granted because of the meek and subdued character Manoj Bajpai plays with such elegance. You know the blushing, nervous, anxious, angry, lonely facets of boring Prof. Siras because – Manoj Bajpai.

Average critic ratings of other movies released in 2015 – 2016

Advertisements

109 Comments

  • @anand.. we have 5 sense organs.. ear (hear), eyes (see), tongue (taste), hand (feel), nose (smell).

    It’s through these sense organs we understand the world and perceive it to be the way it is. But through these you can’t experience god, which makes me believe there are only two possibilities, one, he doesn’t exist or two, he is not the way we perceive him to be.

    After all, all these books exist from the last 2000 years max and humans have been on earth for more than 500,000. So when they didn’t need god before and did well, why do we need a human-created god now?

    If god is indeed the creator and wants men to have sex only with women.. then why is the sex ratio not equal, why do we have 1000:940? The ratio might not seem big, but on an all India level it’s like 61 crore women and 69 crore men. What will the remaining 8 crore men do if they can’t marry a woman?

  • @Neeraj, Well! We have 5 sense organs.. ear (hear), eyes (see), tongue (taste), hand (feel), nose (smell). Then, what about Nipples (especially those of ladies), Clits, Dickheads, Legs of the other parts of the body.. LOL!!!

    On the serious note, this is a good debate finally with you! Yeah, a human understanding is limited to these five factors/senses! So, do you mean to say anything that a human being doesn’t understand within these five senses simply doesn’t exist???

    Then, sorry on you! Do you have a soul? Do you have a spirit? If yes, how do you know it? If not, how do you scientifically prove soul doesn’t exists?

    Secondly, scientifically speaking, 70% of this whole universe is made up of Dark Matter. Dark Matter releases Dark Energy which causes the universe to expand infinitely.

    What is Dark Matter by the way? This has not been sensed by our ears, eyes, hands, tongues and noses?

    This is not scientifically what actually dark matter is. But the scientists firmly believe that this is the thing to be understood and it is beyond a human understanding till now.

    So, doesn’t Dark Matter exist?

    By the way, have you ever been to Pluto or anything outer this solar system? No! How do you know they exist? Oh, you might have seen them with your eyes through media. You believe them to be true because there are strong reasons for you or for me to believe them.

    Otherwise, can’t we bluntly call them to be lying because we haven’t seen them with our own eyes? We don’t.

    So, why should we accuse the people believing to be blind followers because what they believe in maybe beyond your/my understandings? They might have strong reasons to believe in God the way we do have to believe to believe in Science.

  • I feel pitty at the people like yuvraj who think homosexuality is a desease and it can be cured… Who can u cure a person who is made like this by your so called god?? And about you saying gays make children their sexual targets.. Then what about those straight men who sexualy molest and abuse their 12-13 years old daughters, neices and sisters… ??

  • Every day there are more news on tv about straight men sexualy molesting children than gay men… So get ur facts right mr. Yuvraj

  • And yuvraj u r talking this non sense because u don’t have a close friend or relative who is homosexual… What if one day your brother comes to you and tell you that he is gay.. What will u do then?? I doubt if u will have the same opinion about homosexuals then

  • I was taking all the comments on a funny note, but now I could see few serious comments over her and its necessary to reply them and open the eyes of these fools.

    @Star wars 12:48 am : Sick mental people like you will destroy our country one day. So you are ready to even discriminate within Indians (i.e. South Indian and North Indian) and prove that south Indians have good dressing sense (why so, because they wear lungi and cover their body) while north Indians don’t? You stupid, how wearing lungi or covering your body is related to your culture. And yes, I will be a bit blunt here, which culture you are talking about ? The traces of Homosexuality are even found in religious books like Veda, Purana, Upnishad etc. Many kings used to have relations with the slaves having similar sexual orientation. Even in Mahabharata, if you remember there was a character called Srikhandi, who was introduced only to seek the sexual attention of enemies.
    And its not about South India or North India, because the following quotes are excerpts from a south Indian book :

    According to a folk narrative from Koovagam in Tamil Nadu, the Pandavas were told to sacrifice Arjuna’s son Aravan if they wished to win the war at Kurukshetra. Aravan refused to die a virgin. As no woman was willing to marry a man doomed to die in a day, Krishna’s help was sought. Krishna turned into a woman, married Aravan, spent a night with him and when he was finally beheaded, mourned for him like a widow. These stories allow women to have sex with women and men to have sex with men on heterosexual terms. One may interpret these tales as repressed homosexual fantasies of a culture.

    SO homosexuality has nothing to do with culture or progressive mind. If I don’t want to have a relation with a guy, I won’t go for it no matter if I stay in India or any western country. Similarly , even an illiterate (who doesn’t know anything about western culture) can develop a feeling for same sex. So its not about education or development , its all about your feelings. Hope fools like you understand that.

    @Navin Uncle/Aunt/Whatever : Before you give big lecture on homosexuality and question others orientation , I would like to ask your orientation . Because you are not a guy, that’s for sure. The way you conspire and bitch about others throughout the day, you remind me typical Aunt of my colony, whose only duty is to keep an eye on what others are doing. So that proves you are a matured Aunt. But then few of your friends and other readers over here, call you as bro/Uncle etc , that makes me to think if you are guy having the traces of a woman. So that makes you to fall in the category of homo. But in your above comment, you simply denied and told you personally don’t like homosexuality . So what’s your orientation you stupid ??

    @Yuvraj 6:10 am : Since you raised a sensitive matter, won’t make fun of it. So someone came and tried to force his sexual desires on you. But why did that happen? Did you ever think about that? You first tell me, was that person a mental or retard? I don’t think so. So what made him to do that? May be, he was attracted towards same sex. But you were not, so you just denied his interest. Hence just understand one thing, that if someone expresses such desires, it doesn’t mean that he is different or abnormal, just his feelings are different. That’s it.

    @Jhandu 8:56 am : We don’t have any issue with SRK/KJo. Let them enjoy their life. But in the same way, why you morons burn when we speak about Salman-Shera ? For an instance, we can give a benefit of doubt to SRK, since he is leading a happily married life. But same is not the case with Mrs. Shera. Isn’t it?

  • @Bajan 7:04 am : There is a reason why I continuously call you a bimbo. You preach a lot about god. Can you tell me what exactly you know about god? You know nothing.
    And that’s the reason, you told once that you converted into Christian from Islam, because Islam teaches wrong way of living. You idiot, if you believe in god then you would not have spoken such rubbish.
    And you told homosexuality is a sin since its against nature. Can you produce a single proof which shows that homosexuality is against nature?
    For me, God created all the species along with humans ( so humans are not special,but just one among those crores of species) . He didn’t created them with any rulebook or something , that this is how you will have sex, These are the things you will avoid , These are the religions you should not support etc.
    Yes, I will go a bit philosophical here because I am damn frustrated reading the rants of you fools.
    So let me continue, God has sent us as human and all these religious rules, social restriction we created on this earth based on the comfort of Pandits, Maulanas and Priests (You call them Father).
    There is no documentation which says that only sex between opposite gender is normal and rest all is abnormal. Even in Kamasutra (The book which is being treated as alma matter of sex education) , homosexuality has been mentioned. Hence this only proves that homosexuality does existed in ancient era too.
    So just don’t try to fool everyone on the name of god when you yourself don’t know much about that. You are just an extremist , nothing else.

    @King of golden heart 10:48 am :It’s funny that you use a “Golden heart phrase” with your name , when you don’t posses one. Idiot, if me or someone else is talking about the rights of homosexuals, that doesn’t make us homosexual but its all about the rights and feelings of those fistful homosexuals who has to go through all the taunts and tortures from sick mind people like you. They are similar to me, you or someone else over here, with a different sexual orientation. So they all have equal rights as you or me have. But fools like you won’t understand that.

  • @ neeraj- and i think govt and common people should respect all 3 gender and what about their thinking about man/women ratio? they think people kill girls in those states where ratio is more but i feel girls gets more importance then boys in rural areas.

  • @Neeraj : Well said.

    @Anand : There is no question of existence or non-existence of god. For few, god exists, for few, he doesn’t. But that’s not the issue here. The actual pain is, the misconception being spread by some fools here on the name of god. Like, you can see in above comments, few of them went on calling homosexuality a sin and it seems its against nature. Can someone ask these idiots if god came and told these rules in their dreams ?
    For me, there is governing body above us (few call him as god) and we all are dependent on that body. But he/that body sent us on this earth as a blank paper. All these sexual orientation, relations, casts, creeds , our nationality etc was decided when we came on this earth, sadly by the bunch of priests/Pandits and Moulavis.
    That’s why I don’t believe in any religion and I just hate people giving lecture about humanity and god when they don’t know even a bit about the same.

  • First time I have read everybody’s cmnts on an article. Nyc

    I think only some Males can be homosexual from birth so it’s OK for males but I don’t think any girl born lesbian. A girl can get easily attracted towards boys even if she is into girls for any reason.

    A girl can turn itno a bisexual only due to lust or she might hve suffered in life because of a man .

    So yes for male homosexuality but not for female.
    Nd in our country there is a shortage of girls. It’s like 800 female per 100 males. So no lesbian movie should be made in bollywood & it should not be promoted because girls r very experimental ? it should not be accepted.

  • @xzone …so u r talking about equal rights?…i will ask u simple questions…can u ans me plz?….if u r taking stand with homosexual then i think u know everything about it ok….1).so when this homosexuality starts?
    2)from where it get starts?
    3)what happens to them when they start this gayism?
    4)which rights u r talking about?
    5)due to this our society is becoming well cultured or worst cultured?
    6)cant we stop this homosexuality bcoz in future we all r in danger…who knows in future if our children bcome like this?

  • In US there r 4% women who r bisexual nd only 1.2% males who r bisexual from a survey .

    there is 3 times more women as bisexual compare to men nd that’s surely because Hollywood shows many lesbian scenes in their movies.

    So lesbian thing should not be promoted in india because a women can turn itno bisexual easily compare to men nd you nvr know even getting ?? can be tough for boys in future ?????

  • Nd don’t react like tht users here because a boy can’t turn itno a gay because girls r so beautiful ??? so chill ,only from birth a man can be a gay nd that’s OK.

  • @Yuvaraj : Forget about others and look at your own comments :

    *February 25, 2016 at 7:14 pm*

    “homosexuality is shame for our society”

    *February 26, 2016 at 6:10 am*

    “homosexuality may be a great thing in metro cities in india but we small town and villager are always against this thing.”

    *February 26, 2016 at 6:12 am*

    “those who made fun of my comment you should go mental asylm becuse if there is law then there is reason for this law.”

    *February 26, 2016 at 12:36 pm*

    “i think govt and common people should respect all 3 gender”

    Do you see how confused and contradicting you sound? Your views and perception changed drastically and at the end, you said we should respect homosexuals too (who, once upon a time, were shame for you).
    So what you think, what made you change your opinion? Many readers came here and put across their views. You went through those comments and then you realized they are not that bad what you were thinking.
    So it’s all about education my friend. And when I say education, it doesn’t mean holding a degree. Education for me, is something using which a person can analyse and differentiate between certain things.
    Few years back, the same perception was there in our country for HIV patients. They used to throw out not only the victim, but entire family from the society. But now you see, as the awareness level of people is increasing, such cases are narrowing down. Though I won’t say discrimination with HIV patients have been stopped completely, but yes, there is considerable improvement.
    Same will happen in case of homosexuality. As of now, you find them abnormal or bad, but after few years, this perception will definitely change and they will get a chance to lead their life with dignity just like me or you do.

  • @SpamZone, Being unmarried doesn’t necessarily mean he should be a gay. E.g Modi, Ratan Tata, Salman, Akshaye Khanna etc…
    Being married doesn’t necessarily means he should not be a gay. E.g SRK..

    I to back up my claims (SRK-Kjo Kissing, SRK-John Barrowman Lip-lip Kissing & him doing gay scenes in films and awards functions) made above, I’ve video video evidences.

    What evidences do you have to back up what you say on Salman-Shera other than mere assumptions?? Moron!!

  • If u support this issue u r broad minded progressive modernize etc the can do sex but I can’t even disagree coz I am mentally retarded sick narow minded etc what say indicine

  • @Those who are saying about Homosexuality & Indian culture

    Pls don’t comment in any site & don’t use mobile or anything which was discovered on West

    & most important pls use Sanskrit language for speak because that is our indian culture & wear only dhoti.

  • Few retards are calling homosexuals as abnormal.Get a life loosers. i am no GAY but everyone has the right to enjoy their sexuality.

  • @ indicine- too much time for next article? are you taking intrest in debate of god it will never end till someone will give answer who came first hen or egg.
    @ anand- normaly peoples blame god when they are in trouble, they laugh on others when they get same problems and says- it happens because of his bad work(karma) double standard is in peoples mind. i am yuvraj i don’t know what is my spirit’s name? i don’t know what was its name in previous birth? i don’t believe in spirit, what i know if someone takes birth in india he has spirit of indian but if his father changes country and live in usa same spirit will become american and it will forget all indian culture and hindi.
    i don’t have much blind faith in science- sometime pluto is planate and sometimes it is not. i don’t care it is h2o but i am drinking water when i didn’t know it is mixture of hydrogen and oxygen. what i can see after bomb exist we get more terrorist, after cold storage we get more black marketing. i know many of indicine users don’t know what is real test of cows, buffalows or goat’s milk becuse what they are getting is mixuture of milk, water and chemicals.

  • @XZone… first of all, I want to know that who u r ? I mean, muslim ? or Hindu ? if u r muslim then u r gng out of ur path and dng sins and sins if u r hindu then it’s not ur fault bcz u do not read Quran….. I dnt know anything abt Vedas and others bcz I haven’t read those books but Homosexual is haraaam in islam and if u r having sex with a man it is equal to having sex with 70 women, so u better mustn’t talk anything related to religion.

  • @Indicine;For the first time I’ve enjoyed the comments section more than the Original article…Thanks to you for having this Comments option …
    And guys continue… lets keep fighting..

  • @xzone… (it is nt intended to hurt u) u should n must permit ur wife or any girl of urs to roam bare breast in the public bcz nowadays western n american girls r demanding to roam bare breast just like men roam bare chest…. they r demanding to show their boobs at every places and u must allow them to do so…

    and on progression and growth…. one of ur frnd, fan of SRK – Challa (as usual, all srk fans r mindless except some)
    said to Yuvraj that ” @Yuvraj Idiot being homosexual isn’t a crime.Just imagine somebody having to face agony and be deemed as a criminal just because of his sexual orientation.Our nation is making rapid progress and people are being more open to different views but on the other hand idiots like you would stuck to superstitious beliefs even if it doesn’t make sense anymore”
    so before saying anything to me u better teach ur fool frnds that, what is culture and what is progress. ..

    on South Indian…… I’m from North Central India, and I’m not harming anyone by saying that. I’m just giving example of progression. and Culture…
    IF challa think that Homosexual is progression, then u can’t say him right for: u proved me wrong too….
    And if u also think that this is progression then it’s the end of our Indian Culture (whether ur Muslim or Hindu). &

    Nowadays…. american ladies are demanding gender equality in which they want to show their boobs anytime and everywhere….. Now… u should also allow ur family member to show their private part in frnt of all bcz our country is progressing. u indian accepting western culture of Homosexual as progression then u should also accept “showing boobs” as india’s rapid progress. …… LOL tum bewaquf ke liye kya likhu samajh mein hi nahi araha hai…..

    Nowadays indian people have a biggest misunderstanding that everything related to western are Progression and Growth….

    Indian girls are wearing jeans and tops (it is revealing and showing us how big she have) and misunderstanding it as progression. sorry but it’s not progression it’s just a cheating of western peoples….
    she/they can still become engineer, doctor or anyone by wearing salwar or patiala or saree or any indian dress…. it’s not written that without jeans n tshirt u can’t become engr or doct….

    on Lungi…. our Sarook too showed that lungi is nt bad thing…….

    They wear lungi whoever they become but we say that we should change our dress from kurta paijama or any hindu traditional dress to become a good person & we misunderstand it as growth…..
    They don’t change their dress but we change everything,…
    Progression and growth is nothing to do with western culture (showing boobs)….
    why indian are speaking in favour of Homosexual nowadays ?
    They r following footsteps of Western and americans..
    First they slogan in favour of homosexual on seeing that indian are in favour of them too….

    We should and must accept good thing from them (western or american) but not bad thing…
    If u will accept bad thing and call it as growth and u r dng worst thing…

    I think due to people like Challa & Xzone after some years indian girls will be showing their private parts too. some people will be marrying the same gender… and some girls will be following Kim Kardashians…..
    and they will be saying that India is progressing…..

    Indicine plz post this comment bcz it’s very important. maine bahut kuchh nahi likh paya due to my weak english.

  • @xzone I never said homosexuality did not exist you idiotic fool. I am not the bimbo your mother is because she did not teach you that all religions preach against same sec religion. Obviously you are a homosexual and would support that lifestyle but it is not a disease it’s a sin and it’s a decision people make to live that lifestyle. As indicine says it and what people do is their business but that does not make it right. You are the one who is a self righteous bimbo and a terrorist so U most certainly don’t expect anything better from you. I am entitled to believe what I believe and I chose Christianity over Islam because it’s the truth of the Word of God
    Today every prophetic word in the bible has been fulfilled. One more to be fulfilled is the second coming of Christ. You don’t know me but I know you. BTW I have a degree in Theology and I also know more about the Koran than you do. By the way why are so many Imams conversion coming from the Koran itself. Are they too confused as well.
    When someone expresses an opinion that’s their opinions not yours so stop trying to make people on this site believe you are some educated individual you are not and you accuse others of shoving their ideas down others throats when you are doing the same. It is a case of calling the pot black. Suggest you find a bible for yourself and read it and the truth will set you free. I challenge you to do that but then on the other hand you ain’t got the guts to do so. Have a nice days.

  • @Neeraj, the reason behind 61:69 rations of Males to Females could be the Female Foeticide/Infanticide in India. The ratio of female foeticide/infanticide are quite high in India which Indians need to fight against.
    On the other hand, Eriteria has made it compulsory for men to marry more than one woman. Else, death sentence for him.. Because many men died in the war and the ratio of men to women has become quite lower.
    On the average, I believe there are women than men are as in most cases, they are the men that die more in war, in seas, in air, in constructions etc…

    However, if you provide strong data to prove that there more women than men are, I will believe what you provide.

  • @xZone

    My sexual orientation is no secret n neither is yours nor complan boys so dont even try to take the spotlight n point it at me…!

    I already stated what homosexuals like yourself do behind prison doors is noone but your business n aslong as complan boy is sober enough to give his consent to you then knock yourself out son…!

Leave a Comment