Latest issue of Outlook magazine commemorating Khans turning 50 this year and 25 years of Khans’ reign, how their films reflect changing India:
Khans Outlook Magazine
Advertisements
120 Comments
Dont mess with srk fans we give our own verdict or the film is dependent on our fate like we considered hahk lower than ddlj and amitabh sir is junior artist in srk movie ,
we think fardeen and sohail khan are big stars like srk and hence call a solo film a multistarer film in which they work ( other than srk film) .
We r so intelligent so dont dare to laugh on srk fan .@myanmar
u can see the above comment of srk fans .
@sky,so complan boy what’s your frustrations behind these your lame excuses?Kajol made KING KHAN?what a msit silly explanation I ever seen?then could you kindly tell which of kajol’s film is blockbuster with out KING KHAN that she did many with ajay,salman with once,amir with once from 1992-2014 ,oops that mean in entire career even now this year also She will again will get an ATBB with KING KHAN.so why she has only big hits with KING KHAN?MB,VZ are the blockbusters from 2000-2006.
listen complan boy carefully,big hits depends upon numbers of leading male actors acting in the film+directors(with masala genre).I think leading heroines doesn’t considered so big as like them if so,then karishma,asin,kareena,anushka is responsible for the growth career of our perfaketionist.
So you think YRF/DP is responsible efor KING KHAN ‘s career.so here also you’re wrong.because YRF/DP whatever today is only due to KING KHAN .simarly look at salman,rajshri gave him big hits but rajshri couldn’t be as big as like YRF/DP because it worked with salman.similarly YASHJI directed our perfaketionist but our perfaketionist couldn’t impress HIM.so finally it cleared such a 2 leading biggest industries YRF & DP evolved due to KING KHAN.whatever HE touched till now all turned into GOLD.that’s enough to say who HE is.
@myanmar yangon,btw human being’s nature like double standard are creating inside mind not in some dukan/shop.see sallu fan’s logic!,rofl.actually you caught.now don’t overreact ,the verdicts that I gave is actual one that I uses to see from boi.com from very past days which now a days changed I don’t know as I don’t have any interest in that perfaketionist owned site.and the movie that you mentioned in frustrated changed names,that will not help you to help change your salman’s multistarrer special appearance movie as sallu movie.
@gj007,no I talked about actor not films.for an example,in 2007,TZP got critics best award while CDI got best popular award that doesn’t mean TZP is not a classic movie or vice versa.isn’t it?but best critics award went to UDAAN which is really classic.what dabang got is popular award in domestic that earlier even non classic movies like kmg,dhoom2 even got in place of some other good films like KHNH/MB MBBS,so you mean to say later movies are non classic?so you’re telling disaster jai ho collected more than KING KHAN’S HITS? similarly KING KHAN’S super hit movie HNY’s collection is more than l of bhai’s chindi blockbusters—-ready,BG,dabang-1,2,ett,lol.now what you will say joker?
So what I basically want to say is MNIK wa sthe competitor to UDAAN not dabang.dabang is a out.of out masala genre movie.while MNIK is an outstandic evergreen classic.BTW I talked.about MOST FILMFARE WINNING ACTORS—-DILLIPJI,BIGB,KING KHAN. i.e an OUTSTANDING ACTOR not the actor of a good movie,lol.here I’m not looking double standard it’s you who are trying to degrade KING KHAN from every possible angle but couldn’t succeeded,thanks I love to clarify these kind of doubts.
@bakri fan/django,exactly joker even though our non actor bhai gave so much small garbage desi blockbusters,still it’s OUR KING 1st able to broke 3i’s record but our bhai couldn’t,lol.OUR KING could able to take risk of spending 100cr budget for directors like Anubhav/Farah while our bhai/perfaketionist depends upon south remakes/big brands/rajuraju with small budget movies.beside those 2 director’s movie,non of KING KHAN movie hugely promoted ,I hope so you go it,still KING KHAN doesn’t hardly needs plagiarised south stealing movies,lol.BTW promotion can be done hugely in domestic/overseas by GLOBAL SUPERSTARS not south copy paste actor’s / 12 hit stars,lol.
everybody knows dt Aamir has natural beauty& was vry handsame since QSQT til now never aged only he change his hair cuts due 2 his character
while SAROOK was so ugly since Dewana looks like Langoor and now he become double ugly with his old age totally looks like Gorilla
Let me tell to srk fans something. Srk too faces flops n bad phases. What was the fate of Maya Memsaab, Guddu, Zamaana Deewana, Chahaat, Trimurti, Oh Darling Yeh Hai India, Asoka, Duplicate YLJK, even a movie like KHKN was not a clean hit. N his fans calls he has been consistent n ruling since Baazigar. His fans are like his PR, manipulate facts, buzz around, build on hype & finally make it look like a reality. Let me ask then few more questions ?
* Despite giving hits in Multiplex era (post 2003) why srk never gave a big hit like Ghajini or Dabangg until CE ?
you will talk about South remake or Masala : He tried Paheli, Billu n Swades (all unofficial remakes) n failed.
Also he tried with Masala genre (OSO) n finally managed to break HAHK record.
He had great opportunity with RNBDJ but still fell short.
* Could not give a 100 cr movie despite working with 2 biggest banner of industry – YRF & Dharma ?
* Where was his power during Don2 christmas release?
having said that Srk still one of the biggest superstar but he is no more than Aamir n Salman. He rules it once but those days are gone. Accept the reality n Respect the legends !!!!!!!
All 3 are equally good n greats in their own way. We have been entertained throughly with their movies.
Aamir is a legend, he may not have the biggest fan base as other two but his movies are being watched by everyone (even his haters) as his movies promises something new n a real content.
Salman is simple a craze which has lasted forever now. He commands the biggest fan following n turns his movies into biggest hits just by his name n attitude. Though I wud like to see him in more challenging roles.
Srk : He has been consistent but other two (specially Aamir) have zoom ahead of him both in terms of Movies & BO. Srk needs to do more movies with content rather wasting his talent with Farah n Rohit !!!!!
I never said, Filmfare means quality. It is you, who said, “Aamir’s performances didn’t get him any awards.” I can see so much of double standards in your comments.
While I love, love Udaan, and really liked MNIK in second watch, you’re fooling yourself when you say, “MNIK competed for critics awards.” If that is the case, why don’t you count critics awards for best actor which Aamir has won for Raakh and Rang De?
In your answer, you say, classics are not determined by Filmfare awards. My response is “EXACTLY!!” But, if an award can’t recognise value of great films like MBBS, how can you say that these awards are recognizing the best actor of the year?
SRK deserved an award for Kabhi Haan kabhi na ahead of Dil to Pagal he. He never got it. Aamir deserved for Rangeela,not Raja Hindustani. You can’t bash actors only on basis of such magazine awards.
If you want to, then face it, your so-called classics like “JTHJ and Don 2” have no value in eyes of Filmfare!
@hritik why are u acting like coward and always hiding under success of Amir. If u r really Bhai fan debate openly. Be a man. Just don’t bash srk without any reason.
And u are taking flop of movies of srk from his entire career to show his bad phase. Learn first what to called bad phase exactly.
I think you went a bit too far bashing Aamir. While some of his fans wont agree, but I feel AK is never in any race.
look at his film choices and you’ll realize that most of them were potential disasters.
Sarfarosh, Earth, Lagaan, DCH, Mangal Pandey, Rang De, TZP, Talaash. You cant expect these films to compete with commercial films like Main Ho na, K3g, and mosf Yrf-srk collabs.
Not taking away any credit from srk, but yoh cant just say Aamir didnt exist before Ghajini
You say he has very few hits before Lagaan. Agreed. But that tells you the trust his audience has on him. While he was giving “above average” verdict films many of them received appreciation fom audience whk saw those films on TV.
JJWS, hum hai rahi pyar ke, Rangeela, Sarfarosh and even the flop AAA is now considered a cult. Yes srk was certainly ahead of him but Aamir was very well present and gavd Indian cinema some of its most memorable films.
Accept it or not, Aamir has created a a unique brand of himself amd challenged typical commercial cinema time and again and yet he has not just survived but emerged as one of the biggest of his generation!
@hrithik,ha ha your allegations are cometely baseless and untruthful.KING KHAN did remakes in lead role?ROFL ask true things ,then you’ll deserve to get a fitting reply.who said KING KHAN didn’t got a big hit ?all of HIS movies in worldwide beated salman’s movies.HE is all time best actor not a periodic stars like yours,lol.so better ask next time.BTW we are not here to give reply to a non actor’s fan from time to time.
@gj007,I’m crystal clear with my
Opinion always.not ever to trying to allegate someone’s comment as double standard unnecessarily.I don’t required that because I can clarify someone’s doubt with giving reasons with out bashing him.
OK let me clarify you again.MNIK is not as much as popular like dabang so dabang got.that doesn’t mean dabang us eligible to compare with MNIK.when I told you I didn’t count amir’s best actor/critics.I said though he chosen many good scripts still his acting couldn’t tend him to get Filmfare MOST OF THE TIMES.I don’t have any problem whenever he got it it 2-3 times may even more.
I also liked rdb so as LRMB.but both are not true classics.I meant to say a film must have zero imaginative scenes to claim itself as CLASSIC.but I agree what Filmfare did that so given best actor critics to amir.though I felt atul kulkarni acted best and better than amir in rdb who is not the leading actor that’s why.BTW I didn’t watch raakh still yet but surely will watch very soon.
Let me clarify you 1st critics award is for best classic movie while popular/best actor/movie for popular movie of that year.in that perspet MB MBBS got critics award.still why you are unhappy.this is the only year that I dissapointed with Filmfare a two non classic mb mbbs/kmg got instead of a real classic like KHNH.even KING KHAN’S character was equal challenging with sanjay duty as MBBS but more better than hrithik in kmg.I could have happy if KING KHAN/sanjay dutt would have got best critics actor award.that’s the only mistake I saw in filmfare but it is the oldest called the mother Of all Indian film awards.you should feel shame while saying it magazine awards.even Oscars also have some time did mistake that doesn’t mean that is cheap.everyone is imperfect so little mistake done by everyone that doesn’t mean awards like Oscar/Filmfare will be cheap which is 99% accurate of choosing beat films.but your frustration of trying to prove Filmfare as wrong has some other reason which is that it didn’t gave awards to the actor/film you liked the most.
BTW KING KHAN got best actor award KHKN.about DTPH,KING KHAN got for best actor while anil and his film virasat won critics award.why are you thinking even amir should have got award for rangeela which compete with KING KHAN’S EPIC DDLJ.
So I proved all of your allegations wrong.BTW you failed many times to just understand a classic movie must not have any imaginable scenes.amir may be a good actor and script choosing is good that doesn’t mean he is the best performer ,his acting intensity less than KING KHAN even though he is a good actor which might you’ll not accept.I never hated tzp/dch which is true classics according to me.
For your last question I must say,if an action movie can be considered as classic then DON2 should be a classic.while I can openly say JTHJ is a perfect classic movie.BTW rock star got in award which is also a classic should have got over DON2,so I have no objection so I’m happy for that.but JTHJ also faced the classic barfi.though KING KHAN ‘s act in JTHJ is more than rk in barfi still it is an mear deservable chance for both JTHJ and barfi while barfi won as best film/actor while gangs of wasseypur got best critics movie and irfan for PST got best critics actor award which totally satisfied me as all classics won over JTHJ.I’ve no objection with Filmfare.but you’re totally trying to degrade FILMFARE with out only reason that your favourite couldn’t won this.this is not the actual reason to hate someoldest and most reputed film awards and even calling it magazine awards?????really!!!!!ROFL.I think your level of understanding CLASS is too limited and you’re obsessed with your favourites and showing double standardness to show FILMFARE as cheap!!!!!trying to degrade FILMFARE means trying to degrade TRUE CLASS.which might couldn’t be understood by you.
@gJ007 lol movie if turned flopped then blame it to genre. Big joke is that dch, rangeela, hum hai rahi pyar ke sarfarosh is not commercial then how kal ho na ho, veerzara is commertial. It’s seems ur logic is if there is no action then it won’t be commertial. If u r really neutral movie fan (I know u r sensible Amir fan) just review two different movies dch (Akash shalini part) which is compact copy of DDLJ (raj simran). If AAA is not commertial then how come Hera pheri, chachi 420 are commertial which were well success.
And I always said today Amir is one of the biggest star leaving srk salman behind but truth is srk is biggest superstar in past 25 years if take overall picture.
To be honest, I actually liked this answer of yours. You did call my views myopic but you at least justified our stance.
First things first, everything is based on viewpoint. I hate Filmfare, because in “my” views, they have given best actor/director/movie award only to popular films.
Raju Hirani is my favorite, but I’d say, in 2009, there was an equally deserving director whose mind-blowing film got little attention – Shimit Amin for Rocket Singh.
Instances where I felt Filmfare were unfair:
– Ranbir for Barfi, over Paresh Rawal for OMG
– Best film 2008 (Chak De and TZP should have shared that award.)
– Best debut to Imraan Khan ( lol Really? No where near Farhan Akhtar who had to share his award)
– Hrithik Roshan for Dhoom 2 over Sanjay Dutt for Lage Raho Munna Bhai.
– Rakesh Mehra for Rang De over Rajkumar Hirani ( LRMB >>>RDB. RDB propagated controversial vigilante justice, while Raju told us the importance of non-violence.)
-Best film Veer-Zaraa over Swades (biggest wtf moment of all times for neutral fans)
– Farhan Akhtar’s critically acclaimed Lakshya, totally ignored for Yuva.
Go some years back and the trolls were more big than ever.
– Aamir Khan for Raja Hindustani over Nana Patekar for Khamoshi
– Shahrukh Khan for Dil to Pagal Hai over Legendary Kamal Hassan’s Chachi 420
– SRK in KHKN was as good as the award winner Nana Patekar for Krantiveer.
– Aamir khan’s act in JJWS was zillion times better than Anil Kapoor’s outdated Beta.
I can go on and on and on about this. And when I talk about awards, I keep my personal liking towards Aamir totally aside. If I’m an SRK hater, why would I bat for him not getting an award for KHKN?
These are just my views but I have the right to call Filmfare as magazine awards because I don’t believe in them. About “class,” I don’t care what you think. I like optimistic cheerful cinema and have no issues if the director takes creative liberty. You don’t like it? No issues. It’s your opinion but you want to force your opinion by repeatedly telling everyone how some films are classics and some are worthless.
All in all, I still don’t believe in Filmfare, but I appreciate the fact that you at least cleared your viewpoint! Well done. And I don’t really hate SRK. I support him when he does movies like fan. And yes, I lambast Aamir for craps like D3 and Fanaa though I have no hesitation in accepting that he remains my favorite actor because he’s made two of my most favorite films -TZP and 3 Idiots and these films have had a huge impact on my life. :)
I am not blaming any genre sir! I think you didn’t get me.
I being a fan of Aamir never say Aamir is biggest today because of mega-hits like PK and D3. Some of his fans may say that, but I don’t give a sh’t about collections. Why should I bother about collections? Producers, distributors, actors take away money. What do I get? All I get is the”experience” of watching cinema.
I openly lambast crap films like D3 which had zero creativity. All I want to say is, your analysis that Aamir never existed before 2008 is not good. Yes, commercially he was not as big as he is today, but he was always present with content. May be you won’t agree with me, but I find films like Sarfarosh, DCH, Rangeela, Earth immensely fresh and engaging.
Aamir has never followed any pattern in choosing films. He does make commercial Pokemons like D3, Ghajini or Fanna once a while but he chooses to walk the disaster path. It is harebrained on his part to refuse Robot 2 for Dangal. R2 was a potential blockbuster from theword go, but he has refused it!
All I want to say is, commercially the fight was never between SRK and Aamir. It was always V/S Salman.
@gj007 if u found sarfarosh, dch and rangeela is fresh for u symoultaneously yes boss, dilse, raju ban Gaya gentalman are fresh for me. It’s depend I every individual. All these are subjective. Don’t say that Amir movie choices are different. Even srk has even more wide range of movies than Amir like MNIK, chakhde, dilse, Asoka, bazigar, don, darr, raju ban Gaya gentalman, oso, vz etc.
but my all comments are based on outlooks articles.
@gj007 you made a valid point for Aamir,I still remember how much hoy TZP had given to me when I watched it first time,even whenever I watched it I feel proud that thus film is made by a Actor whose first directorial film was TZP.
@sht lol first thing srk even not completed 25 years of career.Second thing what was verdict of srk films like dil se,Ashoka,paheli,swades etc.They were clean flops in Domestic and except Paheli none of them was even a hit in overseas.His zero commercial films were receiving the dull faith, even MNIK was a hit in India.Regarding Aamir his non commercial films like Lagaan,TZP,Rangeela were a successful ventures.TZP despite being released against Welcome collected almost equal to Srk CDI.And you talking that Aamir don’t exist before Ghajini.Aamir has always been take the different path and have guts to do films which he likes too, srk early in his career were churning hits in romantic genre with yrf,kjo family drama and now he is running over Masaka film.Aamir never did that His Ghajini followed by brilliant 3i, than Talaash,Dhoom 3 and Pk and now shift to Dangal.He never went for south oriented masala film or complete masala film after Ghajini.Lagaan,Dch,Mangal Pandey, RDB these were movies which came from Aamir after disastrous Mela, before that he did two brilliant films Earth,Sarfarosh and a good film Mann.He never fear for failure that his biggest strength and in 25 years of his career he beaten all his contemporizes both commercially and critically.Its time for Aamirians to celebrate His 50th birthday.7 days to go.
@sss complan boy why you writing long lasted nonsense, itna jor mat dalo dimag par engg saheb.I am not interested even to read your comments, forget to reply for them.
@sht the whole debate were started when your wrote disrespectful word tingu for Aamir, I wouldn’t even care to your comment what you feel but these word Tingu suggest how you hurt from Aamir.That’s why I responded to your comments.We loves to see you keep comparing Aamir with srk but for me Aamir is bwyong comparison.That’s a fact man.No arguments ahead.
Agreed. SRK has done variety of roles, but Aamir has done less films compared to SRK which means the risk involved in one film for Aamir is very high. For eg. Critically acclaimed Swades failed at Box office but Veer Zara and Main Ho Nai were blockbusters which meant zero loss of star-power for SRK.
Now compare that with Mangal Pandey. Coming back after 4 years and making a biopic was not a wise decision and it affected Aamir’s status badly in the market. People wrote him off and if RDB had failed he would have lost his position completely. What I mean is, Aamir’s risk in films is high and I believe he is not the one with whom SRK’s fans should fight. Aamir was never commercial, if you want to fight, then fight with Salman because he has this hardcore fan base.
I don’t see any point in continuing this discussion because you are hell bent on proving that Aamir didn’t exist before 2008. Take care! Stay blessed!
Thats why i like Aamir. His films are beyond box-office. He creates a strange kind of magic on screen. From Hum hi rahi pyar ke (his first film which I saw) to PK he has evolved tremendously. Haters may say what they want but ignoring Aamir’s contribution to indian cinema is plain banal.
Aamir is like Rancho. A complete rebel who never went with the flow and always followed his heart over mind. He has single-handedly turned commercial cinema on its head and has played some of the most memorable characters of his generation!
@gjoo7
All the cases of filmfare you mentioned depends on people choice…For me Rakesh Mehra for RDB deserved the award .I liked LRNB but I loved RDB.It is still in the list me my 6-7 fav movies.
Although Swades was a good movie but still for me Veer Zara was ahead as it had good content+entertainment value but swades lacked the entertainment.
Similarly for me HR deserved the award for Dhoom2 and yes he was ahead of Sanjay..
Havent watched the movies past 2000 of many stars…I only have collection of srk from that period so cannot comment on that..
@gj007,1st of all thanks for appreciation the way of choosing my class.though no one cares about it in India this is what Oscars do to find their best film.
About your allegations towards Filmfare as magazine award is not at all fare can I say and I would like again to clarify your confusions why Filmfare did so.
Shimit amin’s rocket Singh is also one of my favourite classic.
Before pointing your finger towards Filmfare 1st think what kind of difficult situations it faces:-the choices of Indian people.who are prefering entertainment over CLASS.and the actual deserved film/person.so they repectbly divided and put extra category called critics to rate/ to award those films that couldn’t got appreciation from audience which though every time not happened.which you have to understand at least.
I felt ranbir for barfi and paresh for OMG is equally deservingn and KING KHAN for JTHJ is equally deserving.though the later 2 didn’t got even a nomination.the reason behind those is barfi is still got more popularity which is according to me little overrated but couldn’t get critics award so Filmfare is totally fare.
1st of all CDI and TZP both are tremendous classic and both are equal deserving any awards in Indian cinema.but it’s not fare to say like that,as CDI also didn’t got critics award that tzp got ,so both won in their respectable category for which I’m happy.this time is also Filmfare is totally fare.
After Filmfare given the vote power to audience the debut award always given ti those candidate of popular film rather than critically acclaimed film.which is completely based upon people’s votes ,these votes is also counting for popular actor/film except the one that is critics which is under filmfare’s hand.so Filmfare is always fare who give awards of their own even also considering people’s choices.hats off to them.which problem Oscar never faced and always give awards of their own.
Again same problem.hr got for dhoom2 based on popularity and his act also good like sanjay dutt in lrmb which is also a entertainment movie according movie.still critics gave the award to amir for rdb.no complaints to Filmfare is fare this time also.
It’s a really tough situation.lrmb and rdb both are equal critical acclaimed for me.even mb MBBS is less critical acclaimed than lrmb according to me.though lrmb I like more than rdb,still rakeysh amus deserving more for his creativity which is equally similar to raju’s cretivity.while lrmb won the best critics movie ,rakeysh won beat director.both appreciated by filmfare which is always fare.
Before clarifying this confusion I will suggest you to to remove all the hate if you have something for productions like YRF/DP and it’s directors.KING SRK-YRF/DP collaboration is the most prestigious EPIC larger than life collaboration so far in Bollywood followed by some others like raju-sanjay/amir.the 1st things about them about their outstanding cinematography,2nd things free from imaginative thinkings,3rd about DEEP INTENSE FEELINGS towards a relation which made them LEGEND.everyone are doing movies by using their mind while THEY are making movies from their HEARTS,to understand their movies one must have one thing called HEART.
about your allegations on VZ won over swades.being a neutral fan I will say both are BEST at it’s genre.VZ is the best romantic movie till date in Bollywood even bigger than DDLJ according to me.no doubt SWADES is a masterpiece so as VZ is also.but the thing is some non neutral fan are not liking VZ so much as SWADES,that’s the main problem.otherwise Filmfare is totally fare this time also.
Well I didn’t saw yuva completely till now.but watched lakshya.so couldn’t say who is best in screenplay.that’s not a criteria to degrade Filmfare.
As per your saying I must go some year back to check the unfairness of Filmfare
Amir khan’s role was a good in rh.though I didn’t have seen khamoshi yet.still khamoshi won best movie in critics as well as manisha won beat performer means she is best in khamoshi.so O can’t see the unfairness.
Ha ha…..really?that’s your limit because you’re comparing legendary DTPH with chachi 420.chachi 420 is a comedy more and less emotional role of kamalji,similarly high romantic ,few comedy and less emotional role of KING KHAN you’re comparing.this is totally a must match of comparison,lol.
Sorry,I didn’t found Nana’s role as strong as KING KHAN’S role in KHKN.
BTW beta is the highest grosser of that year which is famous too even though not come closer to jjws in terms value agree.still jjws won in critics category was a gr at job by FILMFARE critics ,so how did you even think they are unfair?
BTW how much you’ll will you enter the deep to find Filmfare as unfair up to that extent I can able to clear your confusion.because FILMFARE is the oldest and most reputed film awards of our country.just like Oscar for all movie across the globe similarly it’s Filmfare for all the movie in India.only losers/masala film wat hers/people who don’t care about real class will say this is unfair or whatever awards that peoplepeoplewill hardly care about them.though only 2 times I found minor mistakes when MB MBBS got instead of KHNH and hr( kmg) over KING KHAN(KHNH) and queen won over EPIC HAIDER.though some other like vidya won over priyanka in barfi is due to people’s votes.
BTW KIBG KHAN won for KHKN ,king you can check.also we’re not hater of amir,still amir bashed only due to his double standard personality and due to salman fans for taking his names and amir fans supporting salman,that’s all.
Your way of liking classics is optimistic cheerful in other sense that means entertainment according to me.that’s the way or standard of wat hinghingovies in India.and sorry that’s not called creativity which includes TZP.as long as someone didn’t do manipulation that movie will hardly give huge entertainment.if some of the movies could be so inspirational for you then KING SRK -THE MAN AGAINST ALL ODD is HIMSELF is the biggest inspiration for me.
@sky,why will I expect any answer from a diehard haters like you.you don’t deserve even a reply.still what you replied to @sht I will must answer to that.why you’re comparing that man who completed 26 year of career by getting help of filmy background family having classics less than that LEGEND who delivered so many classics in just 22-23 years if career?
Amir’s game is not non commercial!he is always interested to add masala entertainment into a classic ,whose result is lagaan,rdb,3i,pk.what is the verdict of real classics semi successful like jjws,sarfarosh,dch,rangeela,all are averages.after I couldn’t even count how many bo duds amirs has in terms of classic.
So amir always takes so many times for scripts,adding masla to a film which is classic for Indians.when amir took guts to do a movie like SWADES,PAHELI,ASOKA which is zero in terms of entertainment.even @gj007 claimed amir took risk with rdb,that’s not risk who work it with a non REAL CLASS film.if a movie can give entertainment by having some unreistic scenes then itself it becomes a commercial one,lol.
Yeah @sky,don’t say about clash because you mocked about JTHJ which must have the highest grosser if your bhai wouldn’t have did conspiracy.so as with tzp happened.also tzp is not a amir film it’s totally a darshil safari show that you Amir fans always ready to take the opportunity.
He beaten all his contemporaries?hard to digest this joke.kindly compare his whole career with KING KHAN you’ll find how much behind he is?
BTW also don’t be jealous of KING KHAN worked with YRF/DP because YRF/DP’s success career starts with KING KHAN.KING KHAN gave them success so as HE is mutually benefitted.It’s they who time to time took their script near KING SRK but KING KHAN didn’t beg them for their scripts.your actors couldn’t made any banner that much big,that’s their fault.unlike your actor who denied of doing negative role in 90’s fearing of losing romantic image and still couldn’t gave such a magnificent perdormance! That’s what called RACE AGAINST FLOW.got you kid?that’s why HE IS THE KING OF BOLLYWOOD.because HE didn’t try to create a league/brand of HIS own rather HIS NAME is th biggest BRAND/league which almost all directors wanted to join with.some actors may concentrating of given importance on scripts but HE is always concentrating upon HIS ACTING,Hope I will see that INTENSE KING of CE CLINAX(recent) once again in this year in a pure class movie.
Dont mess with srk fans we give our own verdict or the film is dependent on our fate like we considered hahk lower than ddlj and amitabh sir is junior artist in srk movie ,
we think fardeen and sohail khan are big stars like srk and hence call a solo film a multistarer film in which they work ( other than srk film) .
We r so intelligent so dont dare to laugh on srk fan .@myanmar
u can see the above comment of srk fans .
@bakri fan
true srk dnt know wat is bb/atbb he knows only hit which he gets by heavy promotions
@sky,so complan boy what’s your frustrations behind these your lame excuses?Kajol made KING KHAN?what a msit silly explanation I ever seen?then could you kindly tell which of kajol’s film is blockbuster with out KING KHAN that she did many with ajay,salman with once,amir with once from 1992-2014 ,oops that mean in entire career even now this year also She will again will get an ATBB with KING KHAN.so why she has only big hits with KING KHAN?MB,VZ are the blockbusters from 2000-2006.
listen complan boy carefully,big hits depends upon numbers of leading male actors acting in the film+directors(with masala genre).I think leading heroines doesn’t considered so big as like them if so,then karishma,asin,kareena,anushka is responsible for the growth career of our perfaketionist.
So you think YRF/DP is responsible efor KING KHAN ‘s career.so here also you’re wrong.because YRF/DP whatever today is only due to KING KHAN .simarly look at salman,rajshri gave him big hits but rajshri couldn’t be as big as like YRF/DP because it worked with salman.similarly YASHJI directed our perfaketionist but our perfaketionist couldn’t impress HIM.so finally it cleared such a 2 leading biggest industries YRF & DP evolved due to KING KHAN.whatever HE touched till now all turned into GOLD.that’s enough to say who HE is.
@myanmar yangon,actually you caught.now don’t overreact ,the verdicts that I gave is actual one that I uses to see from boi.c from the
@myanmar yangon,btw human being’s nature like double standard are creating inside mind not in some dukan/shop.see sallu fan’s logic!,rofl.actually you caught.now don’t overreact ,the verdicts that I gave is actual one that I uses to see from boi.com from very past days which now a days changed I don’t know as I don’t have any interest in that perfaketionist owned site.and the movie that you mentioned in frustrated changed names,that will not help you to help change your salman’s multistarrer special appearance movie as sallu movie.
@gj007,no I talked about actor not films.for an example,in 2007,TZP got critics best award while CDI got best popular award that doesn’t mean TZP is not a classic movie or vice versa.isn’t it?but best critics award went to UDAAN which is really classic.what dabang got is popular award in domestic that earlier even non classic movies like kmg,dhoom2 even got in place of some other good films like KHNH/MB MBBS,so you mean to say later movies are non classic?so you’re telling disaster jai ho collected more than KING KHAN’S HITS? similarly KING KHAN’S super hit movie HNY’s collection is more than l of bhai’s chindi blockbusters—-ready,BG,dabang-1,2,ett,lol.now what you will say joker?
So what I basically want to say is MNIK wa sthe competitor to UDAAN not dabang.dabang is a out.of out masala genre movie.while MNIK is an outstandic evergreen classic.BTW I talked.about MOST FILMFARE WINNING ACTORS—-DILLIPJI,BIGB,KING KHAN. i.e an OUTSTANDING ACTOR not the actor of a good movie,lol.here I’m not looking double standard it’s you who are trying to degrade KING KHAN from every possible angle but couldn’t succeeded,thanks I love to clarify these kind of doubts.
@bakri fan/django,exactly joker even though our non actor bhai gave so much small garbage desi blockbusters,still it’s OUR KING 1st able to broke 3i’s record but our bhai couldn’t,lol.OUR KING could able to take risk of spending 100cr budget for directors like Anubhav/Farah while our bhai/perfaketionist depends upon south remakes/big brands/rajuraju with small budget movies.beside those 2 director’s movie,non of KING KHAN movie hugely promoted ,I hope so you go it,still KING KHAN doesn’t hardly needs plagiarised south stealing movies,lol.BTW promotion can be done hugely in domestic/overseas by GLOBAL SUPERSTARS not south copy paste actor’s / 12 hit stars,lol.
everybody knows dt Aamir has natural beauty& was vry handsame since QSQT til now never aged only he change his hair cuts due 2 his character
while SAROOK was so ugly since Dewana looks like Langoor and now he become double ugly with his old age totally looks like Gorilla
@Bakri Fan : Too good n hilarious !!!!!! lol
Let me tell to srk fans something. Srk too faces flops n bad phases. What was the fate of Maya Memsaab, Guddu, Zamaana Deewana, Chahaat, Trimurti, Oh Darling Yeh Hai India, Asoka, Duplicate YLJK, even a movie like KHKN was not a clean hit. N his fans calls he has been consistent n ruling since Baazigar. His fans are like his PR, manipulate facts, buzz around, build on hype & finally make it look like a reality. Let me ask then few more questions ?
* Despite giving hits in Multiplex era (post 2003) why srk never gave a big hit like Ghajini or Dabangg until CE ?
you will talk about South remake or Masala : He tried Paheli, Billu n Swades (all unofficial remakes) n failed.
Also he tried with Masala genre (OSO) n finally managed to break HAHK record.
He had great opportunity with RNBDJ but still fell short.
* Could not give a 100 cr movie despite working with 2 biggest banner of industry – YRF & Dharma ?
* Where was his power during Don2 christmas release?
having said that Srk still one of the biggest superstar but he is no more than Aamir n Salman. He rules it once but those days are gone. Accept the reality n Respect the legends !!!!!!!
All 3 are equally good n greats in their own way. We have been entertained throughly with their movies.
Aamir is a legend, he may not have the biggest fan base as other two but his movies are being watched by everyone (even his haters) as his movies promises something new n a real content.
Salman is simple a craze which has lasted forever now. He commands the biggest fan following n turns his movies into biggest hits just by his name n attitude. Though I wud like to see him in more challenging roles.
Srk : He has been consistent but other two (specially Aamir) have zoom ahead of him both in terms of Movies & BO. Srk needs to do more movies with content rather wasting his talent with Farah n Rohit !!!!!
@sss : shame on me (yourself) ??? why are you cursing yourself ???
@sss
I never said, Filmfare means quality. It is you, who said, “Aamir’s performances didn’t get him any awards.” I can see so much of double standards in your comments.
While I love, love Udaan, and really liked MNIK in second watch, you’re fooling yourself when you say, “MNIK competed for critics awards.” If that is the case, why don’t you count critics awards for best actor which Aamir has won for Raakh and Rang De?
In your answer, you say, classics are not determined by Filmfare awards. My response is “EXACTLY!!” But, if an award can’t recognise value of great films like MBBS, how can you say that these awards are recognizing the best actor of the year?
SRK deserved an award for Kabhi Haan kabhi na ahead of Dil to Pagal he. He never got it. Aamir deserved for Rangeela,not Raja Hindustani. You can’t bash actors only on basis of such magazine awards.
If you want to, then face it, your so-called classics like “JTHJ and Don 2” have no value in eyes of Filmfare!
@gj007,that jai ho and HNY topic that commented is not for you ,it’s for @myanmar yangon , but the next paragraph is for you.
@hritik why are u acting like coward and always hiding under success of Amir. If u r really Bhai fan debate openly. Be a man. Just don’t bash srk without any reason.
And u are taking flop of movies of srk from his entire career to show his bad phase. Learn first what to called bad phase exactly.
@sht
I think you went a bit too far bashing Aamir. While some of his fans wont agree, but I feel AK is never in any race.
look at his film choices and you’ll realize that most of them were potential disasters.
Sarfarosh, Earth, Lagaan, DCH, Mangal Pandey, Rang De, TZP, Talaash. You cant expect these films to compete with commercial films like Main Ho na, K3g, and mosf Yrf-srk collabs.
Not taking away any credit from srk, but yoh cant just say Aamir didnt exist before Ghajini
You say he has very few hits before Lagaan. Agreed. But that tells you the trust his audience has on him. While he was giving “above average” verdict films many of them received appreciation fom audience whk saw those films on TV.
JJWS, hum hai rahi pyar ke, Rangeela, Sarfarosh and even the flop AAA is now considered a cult. Yes srk was certainly ahead of him but Aamir was very well present and gavd Indian cinema some of its most memorable films.
Accept it or not, Aamir has created a a unique brand of himself amd challenged typical commercial cinema time and again and yet he has not just survived but emerged as one of the biggest of his generation!
@sss
So most filmfare means best actor, right?
Which means srk is better than Raj kapoor and Sanjeev kumar because thwy have less filmfare awards than srk!!!
@hrithik,ha ha your allegations are cometely baseless and untruthful.KING KHAN did remakes in lead role?ROFL ask true things ,then you’ll deserve to get a fitting reply.who said KING KHAN didn’t got a big hit ?all of HIS movies in worldwide beated salman’s movies.HE is all time best actor not a periodic stars like yours,lol.so better ask next time.BTW we are not here to give reply to a non actor’s fan from time to time.
@gj007,I’m crystal clear with my
Opinion always.not ever to trying to allegate someone’s comment as double standard unnecessarily.I don’t required that because I can clarify someone’s doubt with giving reasons with out bashing him.
OK let me clarify you again.MNIK is not as much as popular like dabang so dabang got.that doesn’t mean dabang us eligible to compare with MNIK.when I told you I didn’t count amir’s best actor/critics.I said though he chosen many good scripts still his acting couldn’t tend him to get Filmfare MOST OF THE TIMES.I don’t have any problem whenever he got it it 2-3 times may even more.
I also liked rdb so as LRMB.but both are not true classics.I meant to say a film must have zero imaginative scenes to claim itself as CLASSIC.but I agree what Filmfare did that so given best actor critics to amir.though I felt atul kulkarni acted best and better than amir in rdb who is not the leading actor that’s why.BTW I didn’t watch raakh still yet but surely will watch very soon.
Let me clarify you 1st critics award is for best classic movie while popular/best actor/movie for popular movie of that year.in that perspet MB MBBS got critics award.still why you are unhappy.this is the only year that I dissapointed with Filmfare a two non classic mb mbbs/kmg got instead of a real classic like KHNH.even KING KHAN’S character was equal challenging with sanjay duty as MBBS but more better than hrithik in kmg.I could have happy if KING KHAN/sanjay dutt would have got best critics actor award.that’s the only mistake I saw in filmfare but it is the oldest called the mother Of all Indian film awards.you should feel shame while saying it magazine awards.even Oscars also have some time did mistake that doesn’t mean that is cheap.everyone is imperfect so little mistake done by everyone that doesn’t mean awards like Oscar/Filmfare will be cheap which is 99% accurate of choosing beat films.but your frustration of trying to prove Filmfare as wrong has some other reason which is that it didn’t gave awards to the actor/film you liked the most.
BTW KING KHAN got best actor award KHKN.about DTPH,KING KHAN got for best actor while anil and his film virasat won critics award.why are you thinking even amir should have got award for rangeela which compete with KING KHAN’S EPIC DDLJ.
So I proved all of your allegations wrong.BTW you failed many times to just understand a classic movie must not have any imaginable scenes.amir may be a good actor and script choosing is good that doesn’t mean he is the best performer ,his acting intensity less than KING KHAN even though he is a good actor which might you’ll not accept.I never hated tzp/dch which is true classics according to me.
For your last question I must say,if an action movie can be considered as classic then DON2 should be a classic.while I can openly say JTHJ is a perfect classic movie.BTW rock star got in award which is also a classic should have got over DON2,so I have no objection so I’m happy for that.but JTHJ also faced the classic barfi.though KING KHAN ‘s act in JTHJ is more than rk in barfi still it is an mear deservable chance for both JTHJ and barfi while barfi won as best film/actor while gangs of wasseypur got best critics movie and irfan for PST got best critics actor award which totally satisfied me as all classics won over JTHJ.I’ve no objection with Filmfare.but you’re totally trying to degrade FILMFARE with out only reason that your favourite couldn’t won this.this is not the actual reason to hate someoldest and most reputed film awards and even calling it magazine awards?????really!!!!!ROFL.I think your level of understanding CLASS is too limited and you’re obsessed with your favourites and showing double standardness to show FILMFARE as cheap!!!!!trying to degrade FILMFARE means trying to degrade TRUE CLASS.which might couldn’t be understood by you.
@gJ007 lol movie if turned flopped then blame it to genre. Big joke is that dch, rangeela, hum hai rahi pyar ke sarfarosh is not commercial then how kal ho na ho, veerzara is commertial. It’s seems ur logic is if there is no action then it won’t be commertial. If u r really neutral movie fan (I know u r sensible Amir fan) just review two different movies dch (Akash shalini part) which is compact copy of DDLJ (raj simran). If AAA is not commertial then how come Hera pheri, chachi 420 are commertial which were well success.
And I always said today Amir is one of the biggest star leaving srk salman behind but truth is srk is biggest superstar in past 25 years if take overall picture.
@sss
To be honest, I actually liked this answer of yours. You did call my views myopic but you at least justified our stance.
First things first, everything is based on viewpoint. I hate Filmfare, because in “my” views, they have given best actor/director/movie award only to popular films.
Raju Hirani is my favorite, but I’d say, in 2009, there was an equally deserving director whose mind-blowing film got little attention – Shimit Amin for Rocket Singh.
Instances where I felt Filmfare were unfair:
– Ranbir for Barfi, over Paresh Rawal for OMG
– Best film 2008 (Chak De and TZP should have shared that award.)
– Best debut to Imraan Khan ( lol Really? No where near Farhan Akhtar who had to share his award)
– Hrithik Roshan for Dhoom 2 over Sanjay Dutt for Lage Raho Munna Bhai.
– Rakesh Mehra for Rang De over Rajkumar Hirani ( LRMB >>>RDB. RDB propagated controversial vigilante justice, while Raju told us the importance of non-violence.)
-Best film Veer-Zaraa over Swades (biggest wtf moment of all times for neutral fans)
– Farhan Akhtar’s critically acclaimed Lakshya, totally ignored for Yuva.
Go some years back and the trolls were more big than ever.
– Aamir Khan for Raja Hindustani over Nana Patekar for Khamoshi
– Shahrukh Khan for Dil to Pagal Hai over Legendary Kamal Hassan’s Chachi 420
– SRK in KHKN was as good as the award winner Nana Patekar for Krantiveer.
– Aamir khan’s act in JJWS was zillion times better than Anil Kapoor’s outdated Beta.
I can go on and on and on about this. And when I talk about awards, I keep my personal liking towards Aamir totally aside. If I’m an SRK hater, why would I bat for him not getting an award for KHKN?
These are just my views but I have the right to call Filmfare as magazine awards because I don’t believe in them. About “class,” I don’t care what you think. I like optimistic cheerful cinema and have no issues if the director takes creative liberty. You don’t like it? No issues. It’s your opinion but you want to force your opinion by repeatedly telling everyone how some films are classics and some are worthless.
All in all, I still don’t believe in Filmfare, but I appreciate the fact that you at least cleared your viewpoint! Well done. And I don’t really hate SRK. I support him when he does movies like fan. And yes, I lambast Aamir for craps like D3 and Fanaa though I have no hesitation in accepting that he remains my favorite actor because he’s made two of my most favorite films -TZP and 3 Idiots and these films have had a huge impact on my life. :)
@sht
I am not blaming any genre sir! I think you didn’t get me.
I being a fan of Aamir never say Aamir is biggest today because of mega-hits like PK and D3. Some of his fans may say that, but I don’t give a sh’t about collections. Why should I bother about collections? Producers, distributors, actors take away money. What do I get? All I get is the”experience” of watching cinema.
I openly lambast crap films like D3 which had zero creativity. All I want to say is, your analysis that Aamir never existed before 2008 is not good. Yes, commercially he was not as big as he is today, but he was always present with content. May be you won’t agree with me, but I find films like Sarfarosh, DCH, Rangeela, Earth immensely fresh and engaging.
Aamir has never followed any pattern in choosing films. He does make commercial Pokemons like D3, Ghajini or Fanna once a while but he chooses to walk the disaster path. It is harebrained on his part to refuse Robot 2 for Dangal. R2 was a potential blockbuster from theword go, but he has refused it!
All I want to say is, commercially the fight was never between SRK and Aamir. It was always V/S Salman.
@gj007 if u found sarfarosh, dch and rangeela is fresh for u symoultaneously yes boss, dilse, raju ban Gaya gentalman are fresh for me. It’s depend I every individual. All these are subjective. Don’t say that Amir movie choices are different. Even srk has even more wide range of movies than Amir like MNIK, chakhde, dilse, Asoka, bazigar, don, darr, raju ban Gaya gentalman, oso, vz etc.
but my all comments are based on outlooks articles.
@gj007 you made a valid point for Aamir,I still remember how much hoy TZP had given to me when I watched it first time,even whenever I watched it I feel proud that thus film is made by a Actor whose first directorial film was TZP.
@sht lol first thing srk even not completed 25 years of career.Second thing what was verdict of srk films like dil se,Ashoka,paheli,swades etc.They were clean flops in Domestic and except Paheli none of them was even a hit in overseas.His zero commercial films were receiving the dull faith, even MNIK was a hit in India.Regarding Aamir his non commercial films like Lagaan,TZP,Rangeela were a successful ventures.TZP despite being released against Welcome collected almost equal to Srk CDI.And you talking that Aamir don’t exist before Ghajini.Aamir has always been take the different path and have guts to do films which he likes too, srk early in his career were churning hits in romantic genre with yrf,kjo family drama and now he is running over Masaka film.Aamir never did that His Ghajini followed by brilliant 3i, than Talaash,Dhoom 3 and Pk and now shift to Dangal.He never went for south oriented masala film or complete masala film after Ghajini.Lagaan,Dch,Mangal Pandey, RDB these were movies which came from Aamir after disastrous Mela, before that he did two brilliant films Earth,Sarfarosh and a good film Mann.He never fear for failure that his biggest strength and in 25 years of his career he beaten all his contemporizes both commercially and critically.Its time for Aamirians to celebrate His 50th birthday.7 days to go.
@sss complan boy why you writing long lasted nonsense, itna jor mat dalo dimag par engg saheb.I am not interested even to read your comments, forget to reply for them.
@sht the whole debate were started when your wrote disrespectful word tingu for Aamir, I wouldn’t even care to your comment what you feel but these word Tingu suggest how you hurt from Aamir.That’s why I responded to your comments.We loves to see you keep comparing Aamir with srk but for me Aamir is bwyong comparison.That’s a fact man.No arguments ahead.
@sht
Agreed. SRK has done variety of roles, but Aamir has done less films compared to SRK which means the risk involved in one film for Aamir is very high. For eg. Critically acclaimed Swades failed at Box office but Veer Zara and Main Ho Nai were blockbusters which meant zero loss of star-power for SRK.
Now compare that with Mangal Pandey. Coming back after 4 years and making a biopic was not a wise decision and it affected Aamir’s status badly in the market. People wrote him off and if RDB had failed he would have lost his position completely. What I mean is, Aamir’s risk in films is high and I believe he is not the one with whom SRK’s fans should fight. Aamir was never commercial, if you want to fight, then fight with Salman because he has this hardcore fan base.
I don’t see any point in continuing this discussion because you are hell bent on proving that Aamir didn’t exist before 2008. Take care! Stay blessed!
@sky
Thats why i like Aamir. His films are beyond box-office. He creates a strange kind of magic on screen. From Hum hi rahi pyar ke (his first film which I saw) to PK he has evolved tremendously. Haters may say what they want but ignoring Aamir’s contribution to indian cinema is plain banal.
Aamir is like Rancho. A complete rebel who never went with the flow and always followed his heart over mind. He has single-handedly turned commercial cinema on its head and has played some of the most memorable characters of his generation!
@sht @sss
Brilliant guys…..you are doing great job….Let the haters burn
@gjoo7
All the cases of filmfare you mentioned depends on people choice…For me Rakesh Mehra for RDB deserved the award .I liked LRNB but I loved RDB.It is still in the list me my 6-7 fav movies.
Although Swades was a good movie but still for me Veer Zara was ahead as it had good content+entertainment value but swades lacked the entertainment.
Similarly for me HR deserved the award for Dhoom2 and yes he was ahead of Sanjay..
Havent watched the movies past 2000 of many stars…I only have collection of srk from that period so cannot comment on that..
@gj007,1st of all thanks for appreciation the way of choosing my class.though no one cares about it in India this is what Oscars do to find their best film.
About your allegations towards Filmfare as magazine award is not at all fare can I say and I would like again to clarify your confusions why Filmfare did so.
Shimit amin’s rocket Singh is also one of my favourite classic.
Before pointing your finger towards Filmfare 1st think what kind of difficult situations it faces:-the choices of Indian people.who are prefering entertainment over CLASS.and the actual deserved film/person.so they repectbly divided and put extra category called critics to rate/ to award those films that couldn’t got appreciation from audience which though every time not happened.which you have to understand at least.
I felt ranbir for barfi and paresh for OMG is equally deservingn and KING KHAN for JTHJ is equally deserving.though the later 2 didn’t got even a nomination.the reason behind those is barfi is still got more popularity which is according to me little overrated but couldn’t get critics award so Filmfare is totally fare.
1st of all CDI and TZP both are tremendous classic and both are equal deserving any awards in Indian cinema.but it’s not fare to say like that,as CDI also didn’t got critics award that tzp got ,so both won in their respectable category for which I’m happy.this time is also Filmfare is totally fare.
After Filmfare given the vote power to audience the debut award always given ti those candidate of popular film rather than critically acclaimed film.which is completely based upon people’s votes ,these votes is also counting for popular actor/film except the one that is critics which is under filmfare’s hand.so Filmfare is always fare who give awards of their own even also considering people’s choices.hats off to them.which problem Oscar never faced and always give awards of their own.
Again same problem.hr got for dhoom2 based on popularity and his act also good like sanjay dutt in lrmb which is also a entertainment movie according movie.still critics gave the award to amir for rdb.no complaints to Filmfare is fare this time also.
It’s a really tough situation.lrmb and rdb both are equal critical acclaimed for me.even mb MBBS is less critical acclaimed than lrmb according to me.though lrmb I like more than rdb,still rakeysh amus deserving more for his creativity which is equally similar to raju’s cretivity.while lrmb won the best critics movie ,rakeysh won beat director.both appreciated by filmfare which is always fare.
Before clarifying this confusion I will suggest you to to remove all the hate if you have something for productions like YRF/DP and it’s directors.KING SRK-YRF/DP collaboration is the most prestigious EPIC larger than life collaboration so far in Bollywood followed by some others like raju-sanjay/amir.the 1st things about them about their outstanding cinematography,2nd things free from imaginative thinkings,3rd about DEEP INTENSE FEELINGS towards a relation which made them LEGEND.everyone are doing movies by using their mind while THEY are making movies from their HEARTS,to understand their movies one must have one thing called HEART.
about your allegations on VZ won over swades.being a neutral fan I will say both are BEST at it’s genre.VZ is the best romantic movie till date in Bollywood even bigger than DDLJ according to me.no doubt SWADES is a masterpiece so as VZ is also.but the thing is some non neutral fan are not liking VZ so much as SWADES,that’s the main problem.otherwise Filmfare is totally fare this time also.
Well I didn’t saw yuva completely till now.but watched lakshya.so couldn’t say who is best in screenplay.that’s not a criteria to degrade Filmfare.
As per your saying I must go some year back to check the unfairness of Filmfare
Amir khan’s role was a good in rh.though I didn’t have seen khamoshi yet.still khamoshi won best movie in critics as well as manisha won beat performer means she is best in khamoshi.so O can’t see the unfairness.
Ha ha…..really?that’s your limit because you’re comparing legendary DTPH with chachi 420.chachi 420 is a comedy more and less emotional role of kamalji,similarly high romantic ,few comedy and less emotional role of KING KHAN you’re comparing.this is totally a must match of comparison,lol.
Sorry,I didn’t found Nana’s role as strong as KING KHAN’S role in KHKN.
BTW beta is the highest grosser of that year which is famous too even though not come closer to jjws in terms value agree.still jjws won in critics category was a gr at job by FILMFARE critics ,so how did you even think they are unfair?
BTW how much you’ll will you enter the deep to find Filmfare as unfair up to that extent I can able to clear your confusion.because FILMFARE is the oldest and most reputed film awards of our country.just like Oscar for all movie across the globe similarly it’s Filmfare for all the movie in India.only losers/masala film wat hers/people who don’t care about real class will say this is unfair or whatever awards that peoplepeoplewill hardly care about them.though only 2 times I found minor mistakes when MB MBBS got instead of KHNH and hr( kmg) over KING KHAN(KHNH) and queen won over EPIC HAIDER.though some other like vidya won over priyanka in barfi is due to people’s votes.
BTW KIBG KHAN won for KHKN ,king you can check.also we’re not hater of amir,still amir bashed only due to his double standard personality and due to salman fans for taking his names and amir fans supporting salman,that’s all.
Your way of liking classics is optimistic cheerful in other sense that means entertainment according to me.that’s the way or standard of wat hinghingovies in India.and sorry that’s not called creativity which includes TZP.as long as someone didn’t do manipulation that movie will hardly give huge entertainment.if some of the movies could be so inspirational for you then KING SRK -THE MAN AGAINST ALL ODD is HIMSELF is the biggest inspiration for me.
@sky,why will I expect any answer from a diehard haters like you.you don’t deserve even a reply.still what you replied to @sht I will must answer to that.why you’re comparing that man who completed 26 year of career by getting help of filmy background family having classics less than that LEGEND who delivered so many classics in just 22-23 years if career?
Amir’s game is not non commercial!he is always interested to add masala entertainment into a classic ,whose result is lagaan,rdb,3i,pk.what is the verdict of real classics semi successful like jjws,sarfarosh,dch,rangeela,all are averages.after I couldn’t even count how many bo duds amirs has in terms of classic.
So amir always takes so many times for scripts,adding masla to a film which is classic for Indians.when amir took guts to do a movie like SWADES,PAHELI,ASOKA which is zero in terms of entertainment.even @gj007 claimed amir took risk with rdb,that’s not risk who work it with a non REAL CLASS film.if a movie can give entertainment by having some unreistic scenes then itself it becomes a commercial one,lol.
Yeah @sky,don’t say about clash because you mocked about JTHJ which must have the highest grosser if your bhai wouldn’t have did conspiracy.so as with tzp happened.also tzp is not a amir film it’s totally a darshil safari show that you Amir fans always ready to take the opportunity.
He beaten all his contemporaries?hard to digest this joke.kindly compare his whole career with KING KHAN you’ll find how much behind he is?
BTW also don’t be jealous of KING KHAN worked with YRF/DP because YRF/DP’s success career starts with KING KHAN.KING KHAN gave them success so as HE is mutually benefitted.It’s they who time to time took their script near KING SRK but KING KHAN didn’t beg them for their scripts.your actors couldn’t made any banner that much big,that’s their fault.unlike your actor who denied of doing negative role in 90’s fearing of losing romantic image and still couldn’t gave such a magnificent perdormance! That’s what called RACE AGAINST FLOW.got you kid?that’s why HE IS THE KING OF BOLLYWOOD.because HE didn’t try to create a league/brand of HIS own rather HIS NAME is th biggest BRAND/league which almost all directors wanted to join with.some actors may concentrating of given importance on scripts but HE is always concentrating upon HIS ACTING,Hope I will see that INTENSE KING of CE CLINAX(recent) once again in this year in a pure class movie.
@sht : If we show mirror you call it as coward. It is always better to suupport people’s man rather worshipping a fake king !!!!!!!!!!
*I mean next year if FAN will not release this year.
@hrithik,supreme court is shoeing the mirror,what can a criminal star can do!that’s enough to prove the grade of some peoples in this great country.