The whole idea behind this write up is to make each and everyone understand the complex box office model in India. Any questions, please ask in the comments section below.
Producer: The person who invests in films. The money that a Producer invests in making a film is called the “Budget”. It includes everything from remuneration of the actors, technicians and other crew members to transportation and other costs. Apart from this, once a film is complete, it has to be marketed and that calls for “PA (Promotion & Advertisement)” expenses.
Distributor: The Distributor forms the most vital link in this money chain by acting as a medium between Producers and Theatres. The Producer has to deal out their film to the All India Distributors. The price at which the producer sells his film to the distributors is termed as “Theatrical Rights”. The producer can either directly sell the Theatrical Rights to Distributors or make a contract with any Third Party which in turn has the responsibility to deal with Distributors. In that case the Producer will get his share from the third-party even before his film releases and all Profit/Loss will be incurred by third-party only. For example, Yash Raj Films distribute their films themselves, while Nadiadwala Grandson’s had a contract with EROS for Housefull 2. Indian film industry is majorly distributed in 14 circuits and each have its distributors to represent them :- Mumbai, Delhi/UP, East Punjab, CI (Central India), CP Berar (Central Provinces), Rajasthan, Bihar, West Bengal, Nizam, Mysore, Tamil Nadu, Assam, Orissa and Kerala.
Exhibitor (Theatre): In layman terms, Exhibitor is nothing but a theatre owner. The theatres form the end of the box office model. On pre-defined agreements with the exhibitors, the distributors hire their theatres to showcase films. There are two types of theatres in India: (i) Single Screens (ii) Multiplex Chains and both have different kind of agreements with distributors. This agreement focuses mainly on “Number of Screens” and “Monetary Returns” to be paid back by theatres to Distributors. Entertainment Tax (All India average of 30% approx) is deducted from the total collections at the ticket window. This tax is enforced by individual state governments and thus differs from circuit to circuit. After taxes, a percentage of the total nett gross is paid back to the Distributors. This return is known as “Distributor Share”.
Box Office Terminology:
- 1) Cost of Film = [Budget + PA (Promotion & Advertisement) Expenses]
- 2) Non Theatrical Revenues = Satellite Rights + Music Rights + Overseas subsidy etc.
- 3) Footfalls = Total number of tickets Sold
- 4) Gross Collections = Total money collected from ticket sales
- 5) Net Collections = [Gross collections – Entertainment Tax and others]
- 6) Distributor Share is generally calculated as below:
|Week 1||Week 2||Week 3||Thereafter|
This means 50% of the collections (after entertainment taxes) goes to the Distributor in the first week of release and so on.
- 7) Profit / Loss (Distributor) = [ Amount at which film was bought – Distributor Share ]
Let us now go through a scenario to better understand about these terms.
Case Study – Suppose a film releases with an average ticket price of Rs 120 at Multiplex and Rs 60 at Single Screens in Week 1. 100 people visit a multiplex and single screen each. Entertainment Tax to be deducted from gross collections is same as 30%.
|Average Ticket Price||120||60|
|Gross Collection||100 * 120 = 12000||100 * 60 = 6000|
|Entertainment Tax||0.3 * 12000 = 3600||0.3 * 6000 = 1800|
|Net Collection||12000 – 3600 = 8400||6000 – 1800 = 4200|
|Distributor Share||Fixed 4200(50% — > 0.5 * 8400 = 4200)||Between 2940 and 3780(70% — > 0.7 * 4200 = 2940 /90% — > 0.9 * 4200 = 3780)|
Multiplex v/s Single Screen: It is quite an inevitable fact that Multiplexes have been dominating the box office with every passing year; still the strength of Single Screens can’t be ignored. Single Screens may be termed as the backbone of Distributor Share for the consistent contribution they make and even today, when it comes to making/breaking big records, a film cannot bypass Single Screens.
Hit vs Flop: General norm is that the collection of a film judges how big success it is. But, this is false. In reality it is the Distributor Share which decides a film’s fate because it takes into account both the film’s cost & its box office performance. A film may be called a FLOP fare if it collects 60cr net because of its huge costs to the makers and distributors. On the contrary, another film may turn out to be HIT even if nets 40cr only due to low budget.
Footfalls – An Untold Story: While writing this article, I realized that there is a parameter which is not quite explored/considered in judging box office numbers. And that is Footfalls – i.e the number of people going to watch a film in theatre. One may figure out quickly from above facts that even if more people visit a Single Screen than a Multiplex, Multiplex always has a lead due to high ticket prices.
Love to have your feedback/comments.
Article by Archit Mishra (Read more articles from the author)
Commenting i thing for the first time on Indicine just to say WOW
Great Article dude. Well Explained. Keep It Up ;)
excellent article by indicine, keep it up.
I don’t think any movie had the repeat value as high as that of Sholay, not even Mughal-e-Azam.
Further, one question?
What do you mean by footfall in actual terms? does it mean the number of people present in the theatre to watch the movie or the number of tickets sold? as there are chances of some people deliberately make bookings but the theatre is running empty.
In terms of footfalls
Sholay=3 crore and
3 idiots=2.75 and what about ddlj which is still running in mumbai theatre.has ddlj footfalls reached even 1 crore ? looks like everyday only 2-3 peoples r going regularly from 15 years to watch ddlj.lol
4)Footfalls these 4 categories r most important.
Salman concentrates on only the 4th category and ruling there currently
Aamir concentrates on all 4 categories and doing very good in all categories while
Srk concentrates on only first 3 categories.lol. bcoz he can’t buy the 4th category like awards.lol
loved it man…grt work indicine
My question to you Mr. Archit is when a film is termed as a hit, does it mean that it has doubled its investments from the point of view of theatrical rights or it has doubled its budget from the point of view of the producer ???
@JC AND ALL OTHERS WHO THINKS MUGHAL-E-AZAM IS NOT GOOD AS COMPARE TO SHOLAY, SHOLAY THEY WILL RELEASE FREQ NO DOG WILL GO TO WATCH THE MOVIE,AND FOR UR KIND INFORMATION MUGHAL-E-AZAM RELEASED FEW YRS BACK IN COLORS ITS DID 100 DAYS IN THIS GENERATION ALSO, NOT LIKE SHOLAY THEATRE OWNERS RELEASES SHOLAY MOVIE MANY TIME BUT NOT EVEN WORKED OUT FOR A SINGLE WEEK.AND ABOUT MUGHAL-E-AZAM WHAT U KNOW ABOUT THAT MOVIE IT SUCH A GREAT MOVIE AND HIGH BUDGET WHEN THE MOVIE SHOOTED LONG FOR 15 YRS GOT AND THEN RELEASED IN 1950 PEOPLES WILL NOT GO TO THEIR HOUSES LEAVING THEATRES TICKET COUNTERS AND ALSO IN A BIG WAY THE PEOPLES COMES TO WATCH THE MOVIE FROM THIER VILLAGES AND SLEPT @ THE THEATRES ONLY,THIS WAS THE CRAZE……..
Interesting article.. but I would like to know how you counted the single screen share? As far as I know.. single screens are rented. Can you explain please?
@jc Bro I think Sholay and Mughal-e-Azam are seperate entities altogether so you cannot compare the repeat value of both movies. I kind of know what you mean coz growing up and in my teen years then I can remember watching a dvd copy of Sholay with my friends on numerous occasions because for me it was a clasdic tale of friends for life. But when the color enhanced Mughal-e-Azam released it was a once in a life time moment to watch it in theatres again because it is a historic film. Making a comparison then one can say it was Bollywoods answer to Hollywoods ‘Cleopatra’, a masterpiece because of lavish sets and huge expenditures involved. For its time Mughal-e-Azam was light years ahead of its competitors.
Both films have great repeat value for different reasons, Sholay because it shows us great camoraderie between friends and Mughal-e-Azam for its great conflict between father and son. Both films deserve equal respect and should be viewed with great pride and honour that 100 years of cinema has given us these 2 classics amongst many more.
Deols killed it with Gadar and Sholay! Biggest hits of indian cinema… Deols were too dominating at the box office in their primes!
First time n may b d last time I agree to navin
Dabangg 2 became the third film to hit 250 crore mark worldwide. Three idiots and Ek Tha Tiger have crossed 300 crore while the ten films below have all crossed 200 crore Worldwide. Below are the top grossers in terms of Worldwide GROSS.
1. Three Idiots (2009) – 385 crore
2. Ek Tha Tiger (2012) – 310 crore
3. Dabangg 2 (2012) – 250 crore
4. Bodyguard (2011) – 230 crore
5. Dabangg (2010) – 215 crore
when a film flops who lost money, producers or distributors.can you tell me how they recover their money(for both producers and distributors).
WOW…. Indicine is Back
I await your reply on my query regarding footfalls.
Dude, did i personally insult you, that you start barking like mad?
Thanks for your writing, but i never told Mughal-E is not worth it. I regard it one of the master-piece of Indian cinema like Mother India. What brilliant movies they were, and also Pyaasa. Classic.
But when it comes to comparision, it has always been these two ultimate movies that clash.
All I am saying is that Sholay released many times in theatres and it has so many runs on videos and tv that whenever we find it running, we do check out for the favourite moment or scene.
I don’t think any movie has so many scenes and dialogues that is super-hit. Amjad Khan was the best of the lot with his role of Gabbar.
We wait for the train sequence, we wait for gabbar’s entry, we wait for thakur’s confrontation with gabbar, we wait for jai & veeru’s confrontation with gabbar after holi, the comic scenes of soorma bhopali, asrani the angrez ke zaamane ke Jailer, then the hariram nai funny part in Jail, the entry of Basanti and her long conversation, mehbooba song……..the list is just endless.
Yes, i have grown with all the hype of Sholay, and infact i saw it only after some 10 years when it again released, on a 70mm screen, and it was great. Just like some of you felt great watch Mughal-E in colour when it re-released.
Hence, for the above i feel the repeat value of Sholay is much higher than anyone, you just can’t ignore it and the many scenes in it, as the reasons are too many to once again catch the moment.
@JC bro I dont think I could have given a better case in favour of Sholay than what you have so for that I respect you entirely and commend you for making an arguement in favour of Sholay. For me I couldnt add anything more to what I have already said but at a push then like you I would maybe but reluctantly walk into a show showing Sholay first with friends before walking into a showing of Mughal-e-Azam with family second. Its a tough call to make but everyone should appreciate your honesty and kudos for sticking to your beliefs.
We thank Mehboob sahb and Ramesh ji for giving us this great conandrum to deal with as to which movie is the greater film.
Thank you and may Bollywood in the next 100 years give us further movies to conduct debates on and have many more fruitful discussions.
God bless the Indian movie going audiences.
but there is one mistake
number 5 should be
Net Collections = [Gross collections – Cost of Film and Entertainment Tax]
not Net Collections = [Gross collections – Entertainment Tax]
@remotecontrol No surprises to see You are making a fool out of yourself once again. :-D
Please Read the article again with lenses if needed and digest it in smaller portions if it helps you understand it.
You are struggling with the concept of Net Collections so how will you understand the complexities involved in Gross and Net Profit figures???
PS time for you to insert a new set of batteries my friend as your current set are sparked out..!
you are making fool of yourself
once again you ve proven that you are cattle- brained driven douchbag
any pupil of elementary school knows that net gross equals total gross minus CAPITAL and capital here budget of the film PA (Promotion & Advertisement) Expenses
+ entertainment tax
for example lets say
a box weighs 125 kg weight gross
when its packaged with goods it weighs 125 kg
the goods by themselves we find them weigh 100 kg
so what is the net gross of the box
isnt125 kg minus 100?
which equals 25 kg for the box
use your brain
this is how usboxoffice work
if you have another reasoning you navin
then i should add you to algaddafi list of most stupid ppl of all time
Thanks everybody for the comments/appreciation. My Answers:-
@ JC – Footfall is the count of tickets sold.
@ Tinku Jain – A film’s Verdict must always be judged by the Distributor’s Earnings rather than Producers’ share. These days Producers are mostly in the safe zone even before the release of the film due to calculated budget and theatrical/sattelite/music rights price. So, a film becomes HIT when the Distributor Earning is substantially more than the Theatrical Rights price.
@ Amit – As mentioned above, Theatrical Verdict is determined by Distributor’s state. If he makes profit then the film is HIT and vice versa.
@ Vivek – Yes, u r rite Single Screens are rented on pre-defined terms between Distributor & Exhibitor. For an instance, a big film like ETT may have Dist Share as high as 90% (of the net collections) while it may just be around 70% for a small film like TableNo.21. Whats notable here is that unlike multiplexes, the distributor share is always constant throughout the lifetime of the film.
Keep Browsing Indicine !
@remotecontrol You are beyond help. READ the article- many agree that it was a great article and well researched/ explained but yet you are struggling with this ‘new phonomenon’ called Net Collections. This is India and we are not USA. We have our own system and finance laws etc etc to comply with.
@navin I didnt deny that its a good article, but be rational and follow logic. You should go back to school and learn abcd of commerce and management and the logic is universal not only on usa or europe .
*We have our own system and finance laws etc etc to comply with.* lol are u kidding me? i didnt know that you are so ridiculous
dont you guys study karl marx capital frederec angels ,adam smith , merchantalism etc study laws of commerce are universal baby
u miss the point
@ remotecotrol yes you right your observation is so sharp. I dont know why the writer made such a terrible mistake?
@ navin go learn gross and net gross then talk
your comments make no sense
We are not calculating the net profit here, but the net BO collections.
Gross collections (total collections from ticket sales) minus entertainment taxes = net box office collections.
For more read this article http://www.indicine.com/movies/bollywood/gross-and-nett-gross-the-difference/
@raj and @remotecontrol Nice to see retards stand United but it still doesnt mean you two jabronis are talking sense. The subject was Net Collections but you two intellects of a superior education want to diversify and talk about Gross or Net Profits or whatever… Jeez what was the article about and where have you two jabronis taken it is beyond reason. Talk about making a mountain out of a mole!!!
Thanks Indicine. Great article. I was thinking people like xzone and star would struggle with this article but remotecontrol and his controller Raj have exasperated everyone with their shortcomings.
Keep up the good work Indicine and remotecontrol and Raj- guys I suggest you keep your noses clean in future as to avert people from thinking that you are really retarded.
intellectual people discuss ideas of people
shallow minded like navin targets persons not ideas
behave yourself navin the biggest retarded in the world